The Marriage-Industrial Complex 

While California's State Government is on the brink of going the way of Bear Stearns, the so-called leaders of the Golden State's gay and lesbian community spent Tuesday in Sacramento lobbying legislators. Their goal? Passage of two non-binding resolutions asking the state to overturn Proposition 8, the constitutional amendment approved last fall eliminating the right for same-sex couples to marry.

There was apparently no other legislative priority for this group, a fine demonstration of the recently minted marriage-industrial complex - which sustains these organizations' fundraising and supports the livelihoods of their employees.

Equality California, the group that brought you the passage of Proposition 8 despite its best deliberate efforts to the contrary, needs marriage rights for same-sex couples to remain in doubt, otherwise there would be little reason for the organization to exist. The same goes for opponents of marriage equality as well.

A lobby day like the one hosted by Equality California can always be subject to the risks of outside events but the group's agenda this week showed a tin ear, not just for the dire financial situation that California currently faces, but to the needs of the community they claim to represent.

There is never a good reason to delay equal rights for any Americans but the California Legislature has a lot on its hands these days--a $40 billion budget deficit, sinking credit ratings, furloughs and layoffs and a partisan stalemate, to name a few.

Meaning that unless something generates revenue or reduces costs, the state's legislators don't want to hear about it. And although Proposition 8 will cost California governments tens of millions of dollars in revenue if not overturned by the courts, nothing the legislature can do about that will help reduce an immediate budget gap nearing the tens of billions of dollars.

And regardless of what the legislature does, the gay marriage issue is in the courts. The California Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on the validity of Proposition 8 on March 5 and render a decision within 90 days. Whatever happens next, Sacramento won't have much to say about it.

If the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of Proposition 8, supporters of marriage equality will have to marshal their forces to qualify, and pass a new initiative to overturn it. Should the justices decide that Proposition 8 is invalid, there are threats of recall from the proponents of the measure.

Rather than lobbying legislators, who seem beholden to their own parties' special interests to begin with, it would seem that the resources of both sides of the marriage-industrial complex would be best spent talking to regular Californians, the voters who - depending on how the court rules - will decide to either overturn the courts' decision or throw the justices out.

Either way, groups like Equality California have declared with their agenda that marriage equality is the Armageddon of gay rights battles in California. But after that battle is won, will the state really need a multi-million dollar organization to lobby Sacramento to create a Harvey Milk Day?

With More than $80 million spent to persuade California voters on how to vote on Proposition 8, the question of marriage equality is very lucrative, which is why no decision by the Supreme Court will be definitive. The need to sustain a marriage-industrial complex of political consultants, their vendors and non-profit activist groups will keep the "leaders" on both sides of this issue employed for years to come, if only to find a justification for their six-figure paychecks.

Copyright (c) 2007, SteelWill, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Spot On is a trademark of SteelWill, Inc.

Tags: ,


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments will be removed.

Latest in Opinion

Author Archives

  • Healthcare Politics Trumps Good Policy

    Time will tell if President Obama managed to hit the "reset" button with his Wednesday evening speech to Congress on healthcare. ...
    • Sep 11, 2009
  • The GOP's Decline-to-Win Strategy

    The California Republican Party has finally found a way to make its September convention in Rancho Mirage relevant. It's going to ...
    • Aug 26, 2009
  • More»

Most Popular Stories

  • The Express' November 2018 Endorsement Guide

    We endorse Schaaf, Ezzy Ashcraft, and Butt; along with Fortunato Bas, Thao, Middleton, and Whitaker for Oakland council and Knox White and Oddie for Alameda council.
  • Role Reversals in the Oakland Mayor's Race

    In the Oakland mayor's race, the normally staid Libby Schaaf has come out swinging, while one of her top challengers, the usually brash Cat Brooks, is acting more like a Fortune 500 CEO.
  • Richmond at a Crossroads

    The city is on the verge of an economic boom: Will Mayor Tom Butt, a longtime city official, lead it to prosperity, or will the Richmond Progressive Alliance take full control of City Hall?
  • Island Gone Wild

    This has been a crazy year in Alameda politics, and it's about to get crazier.
  • Oakland Council District 4 Is a Wide-Open Contest

    With the incumbent quitting, the race features seven candidates, including three who are running as a slate.

Special Reports

Fall Arts 2018

Our Picks for the Best Events of the Fall Arts Season

The Queer & Trans Issue 2018

Stories about creating safe spaces in the Queer and Trans community.

© 2018 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation