Pete Stark: Raving, Mad, Unapologetic 

Fremont's congressman made news when he compared the Iraq war to "an act of extreme terrorism." But did he weaken himself politically?

Page 2 of 3

But when it comes to the war in Iraq, some observers suggest that the 72-year-old Stark may be out of step with his constituents on Iraq -- a situation that seems to be the opposite of his district's situation in 1972. "If a recent poll showing that, as of about April 1, most Bay Area residents supported the US and coalition military action in Iraq is correct, then Stark is to the left of his constituency on that issue," Barone says. That field poll showed that 63 percent of Bay Area residents supported a US strike to remove Saddam Hussein.

However, Stark's criticism hasn't wavered in the face of public attention, or now that Bush has officially declared the war over; he remains fiercely critical of the government's actions in the Middle East. "They haven't found Saddam, and the sick part of this is it gives them an excuse to go into Syria -- they say he must've gone there and taken his weapons with him," he says. "Then they'll say let's go to Iran and Saudi Arabia and on and on. All this has me shaking my head in frustration and wonderment that people can be so cruel."

Stark is not the sort of guy to back away from his comments just because they may be unpopular in some quarters. "I was trying as best I could to tell everybody that the emperor has no clothes, to say 'Wake up, America,'" he says in explanation of his original "terrorism" remark. "I know enough about the military to know they don't have three thousand of anything that will hit their target 100 percent of the time. You have to figure that 10 percent of them are going to go astray: That means you're dropping three hundred damn big bombs on a highly populated area. The Bay Area is five, six million people -- about the size of Baghdad with a little water in between. If you dropped three thousand bombs on the Bay Area, would that be an act of terrorism or not? I think it would."

He says he was careful to make sure his quote would not be construed as calling the president a terrorist. "I said we as a nation committed a terrorist act," Stark says. "What was 'shock and awe' if they weren't going in trying to scare everybody into surrendering? And what do terrorists do but scare the population?"

Stark remains equally outspoken about the domestic issues that he worries may be ignored as funds are dedicated toward rebuilding Iraq. "We're going to go over and create two million jobs in Iraq for infrastructure, bureaucracy, and peacekeeping, but we have two million people in this country whose unemployment benefits expire by the end of this year," he says. "We're going to provide health care to every Iraqi, but we have 43 million Americans without health care, 12 million of them children. We're going to rebuild their schools and we have a lot of schools in our community that are not earthquake-proof. ... All these wonderful things we're going to do in Iraq we could be doing here had we not invaded in the first place."

Is there a political price to pay for being such a presidential heckler? Spillane notes that Stark's actual legislative record isn't that shocking -- he tends to vote in line with the rest of the Bay Area delegation -- but that his style has made him more of a sore thumb than East Bay colleague Barbara Lee. "Ironically Stark's style is what has made him even more controversial than her in some ways," Spillane says. "He has embarrassed himself with his comments repeatedly and has become a lightning rod in the House as one of the more obnoxious and least credible members of the party."

But Stark doesn't have to be elected by all of the nation's voters: He just has to impress those at home. Barone believes that even Stark's most biting comments about the war or the president are unlikely to repel most Thirteenth District voters. "There is a large core of Democratic primary voters who believe that Bush is an illegitimate president, a moron, a mindless warmonger," he says. And Gale Kaufman, head of Kaufman Campaign Consultants, which has run prominent Bay Area Democrats such as Lee, San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, and Assemblywoman Liz Figueroa, says liberal voters are unlikely to hold Stark's comments against him. "I think it's naive to believe a view like that would take anybody out in a Democratic district," she says. "People are much more tolerant as long as you're clear on your view and why you take it. There was that moment of discussion people had about running against Barbara Lee on those grounds, and that was over very quickly because they found that whether voters agree with her or not, they were adamant in her right to have her opinion."

Is there any truth to California Political Week's claims that Klehs and Eastin are being recruited to unseat Stark? Spokespersons for Berman and Lockyer, the putative recruiters, dismiss the rumor as "total fiction" and "completely wrong," respectively. Nathan Barankin, spokesman for the attorney general, also refutes the claim that there's any bad blood between Stark and his boss. "Their friendship runs long and deep and it's Lockyer's hope that Stark will, as he has consistently done over the last couple of decades, win re-election," he says.

As for the touted challengers themselves, Johan Klehs says firmly that he has no plans to run; he has already filed to run for the state assembly next November for the 18th district seat soon to be vacated by termed-out Rep. Ellen Corbett. And both Klehs and Stark already have endorsed one another for their respective 2004 races.

Eastin, who is now the executive director of the National Institute for School Leadership, is up front about her future interest in Stark's position. "If Stark retired, I would consider a run for the seat, but I'm not going to challenge him," she says. "I'm not interested in having a family feud."

Stark seems unfazed at the thought of a primary challenge if a candidate does manage to turn up, and good-naturedly points out that it would be folly to ignore the possibility of competition from his own party. "All of us in the House, we're aware that the best group of politicians in California go to work in Sacramento every morning and they're all in some kind of term limit situation," he says. "If they love politics as much as I do, they're going to be looking around for jobs." But he also points out that he got his job in a year in which a dozen candidates ran against the incumbent, splitting the vote, a situation unlikely to repeat itself. The congressman has won the last several election cycles by healthy margins.

Stark says the letters his office has received have been favorable by a ten-to-one margin, although he acknowledges his outspokenness has drawn some fire. "Does that do me any good come November of '04?" he asks. "Probably not. But I guess that I am so happy with the people I represent and feel so much a part of that community where I've lived forever, it seems they'd be disappointed in me if I did anything less." He feels firmly in step with his constituents and with the greater Bay Area, which has played such a large role in protesting the war. "We've got libraries that are refusing to turn over lists to the FBI, God bless 'em, and a couple of cities refusing to gather information on people with funny last names," he says proudly. "Where else would you find those kinds of people?"

Tags: ,

Latest in News

Author Archives

  • The Structure Is the Message

    What if cancer is triggered by changes outside the cell?
    • Dec 12, 2007
  • Thinking Outside the Cell

    For decades, the scientific establishment ignored Mina Bissell. Now her insights could revolutionize how cancer is understood and treated.
    • Dec 12, 2007
  • More»

News Blogs

Most Popular Stories

Special Reports

The Beer Issue 2020

The Decade in Review

The events and trends that shaped the Teens.

Best of the East Bay

2020

© 2021 Telegraph Media    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation