Peralta College District's Mind-Boggling Mismanagement Revealed 

Plus Kaiser Thwarts Strike Vote and Supervisors Approve Housing

click to enlarge The college system was graded as having an extremely high risk of insolvency.
  • The college system was graded as having an extremely high risk of insolvency.

An impartial assessment of the struggling Peralta Community College District rated its risk of insolvency as high and urged that new leadership is needed to effectively rid the district of years of neglect. According to the scathing report, poor communication among its four colleges is the norm and the district's internal procedures are "simply broken."

The systemic mismanagement at the Peralta Community College District has been documented in recent years, but rarely to this extent. Based on a risk assessment scale created by the state's Fiscal Crisis and Management Assessment Team, which prepared the study, a school district with a score of 40 percent or more is rating as having a high risk of insolvency. Peralta's score is a shocking 69.9 percent.

The report also raised concerns over increases in the number of full-time employees at two of its four colleges at time when enrollment district-wide has been dwindling for a number of years. The report repeatedly references a general lack of communication at all levels of the district, and between colleges — Berkeley City College, College of Alameda, Laney College, and Merritt College. A symptom of which is that the chancellor's office is too large, according to the report. Including the currently vacant position of chancellor, Peralta employs six high-level managers where many districts of similar size employ two or three, the report said. "The current structure is cost-prohibitive, inefficient, and adds to the ineffective and poor communication throughout the district."

Long-standing criticisms that the Peralta Community College District's finances are chronically mismanaged may stem from a large number of vacancies in its finance and accounting departments. "The staff available to answer questions often were not knowledgeable and could discuss their specific function, but not how their responsibilities assist in the overall organization."

The report also faulted Peralta for contracting with the same independent auditing firm for 17 years and urged it to hire a new firm. The district also has allowed an internal auditor position to lay vacant for months. In addition, poor internal controls exist that put the district at a "severe risk of undetected fraud," the report continued.

Furthermore, employment in the chancellor's office is typically "based on that position's relationships with specific people he may have hired or placed in specific roles. As a result of those relationships, some staff are perceived as 'untouchable' while others are perceived as ostracized," the report said.

The Fiscal Crisis and Management Assessment Team issued its report on June 28 and will officially present its findings to the Peralta Community College District Board of Trustees in Sept. 10.

Kaiser Stymied Strike Vote in the East Bay

Kaiser Permanente management closed hospital cafeterias across the state Monday before a vote by some of its workers to authorize a strike this fall. According to the Service Employees International Union, its labor contract with Kaiser allows for the use of cafeterias as a public space for union business with its members. One SEIU member said management's move was akin to a "corporate hissy fit."

The meeting spaces were closed at Kaiser hospitals in Oakland, Berkeley, San Leandro, Fremont, Livermore, and Pleasanton, a representative for Service Employee Union International said. SEIU represents more than 4,800 employees at Kaiser facilities in the East Bay.

Nurses arrived at cafeterias to vote on giving the thumbs-up for a strike that would begin in October, only to find the spaces had been closed. SEIU said nurses have been without a contract since last September.

Supes Approve San Lorenzo Housing, But Not Before Angering Chan

The Alameda County Board of Supervisors set aside union objections to the 163-unit San Lorenzo Village Green market-rate housing development, moving forward with a project that has received wide support in the unincorporated area.

While the unsuccessful appeal by various trade unions was made on the pretense of environmental concerns, most of discourse Tuesday afternoon revolved around a push by the unions to extract labor agreements from the developer and a desire by some supervisors to again postpone a vote on the project, a move that angered Alameda County Supervisor Wilma Chan, who represents the area.

"Even though it's been stated that no further negotiations can take place, I don't necessarily believe that," Miley said. "I do think we can squeeze a few more community benefits out of this before we have to take the vote."

A vote on San Lorenzo Village Green had been twice postponed since the spring. Alameda County Supervisors Richard Valle and Nate Miley attempted to nudge developer Terry Demmon toward one last meeting with the unions to reach a labor agreement before voting on the project. Demmon obliged, but when asked later by Chan about the prospects of a deal being made, he replied there is "zero chance I change my mind. I just can't bend anymore." In fact, Demmon had agreed to labor agreements with two of the four unions prior to Tuesday's meeting. He stated willingness to reach an agreement with the other two unions if their offer is within 10 percent of the lowest bid.

Miley's persistence in postponing the vote angered Chan. She tore into him for violating an unwritten rule that says boardmembers should shy away from opposing projects that are supported by the supervisor in their own district. "I always take into account that the supervisor who represents that district has done their groundwork and knows their community well," Chan said.

She appeared to become even more upset at any suggestion that her vote for the project represented a slight to union labor. "You all know that I'm a strong supporter of labor on this board," she said. "There is no question about that. I ask you to give me the same type of respect that I have given every supervisor on this board for the nine years that have served here. I feel very disrespected. ... There is absolutely no reason and no plus in postponing this for two weeks."



Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments will be removed.

Latest in Seven Days

Author Archives

Most Popular Stories

Special Reports

The Beer Issue 2020

The Decade in Review

The events and trends that shaped the Teens.

Best of the East Bay


© 2020 Telegraph Media    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation