Obama's Hypocrisy 

He promised transparency, but recent revelations about phone-data collecting prove once again that he prefers secrecy.

When Barack Obama first ran for president in 2008, he vowed to restore transparency and openness to government. The former constitutional law professor had been especially critical of the administration of President George W. Bush and its abuses of civil liberties, from secretly torturing prisoners at unnamed "black sites" to conducting wiretaps without warrants in apparent violation of federal law. But while Obama has been a much better president than Bush, he has repeatedly failed to live up to his campaign promises during his four-plus years in the White House.

The Obama Justice Department, for example, has led more criminal probes of government whistleblowers than all other administrations combined. And new revelations disclosed last week by the Guardian that Obama's National Security Agency has been collecting data of all phone calls made by Americans likely will result in yet another attempt to imprison someone who has let us know what our government is doing. Indeed, some Obama administration officials have already called for the prosecution of the Guardian's source, Edward Snowden, a 29-year-old employee of a defense contractor. US Senator Dianne Feinstein of California contended earlier this week that Snowden's actions amounted to "treason."

But a criminal prosecution of Snowden promises to be steeped in even more hypocrisy. During a visit to the Bay Area last week, Obama attempted to greatly downplay the constitutional questions raised by the massive data-collection operation. He called the flurry of news stories about the secret warrant Snowden leaked to the Guardian, showing that the NSA has been collecting the records of all of Verizon phone company's customers, regardless of whether they are suspected of wrongdoing — including the phone numbers they call; the phone numbers of people who call them; the location of their calls; and the dates, times, and duration of calls — "hype." "Nobody's listening to the content of people's phone calls," the president declared.

That may be true, but Obama can't have it both ways. He can't tell us that collecting our phone data is no big deal, while other members of his administration tell us that this program was vital, should have been kept secret, and was such a big deal that the person who leaked the information must be prosecuted. Some Senate leaders also disclosed that the NSA has been collecting this type of information from all phone carriers nationwide for seven years.

The Guardian and Washington Post also revealed — thanks to Snowden — that the NSA has the ability to gather a wide range of Internet-usage information from major tech companies, including Facebook, Google, and Apple. However, this secret program appears to be not as sweeping as the phone-data-collection program.

Regardless, the problem with all of this is the lack of transparency. It's one thing to keep secret an investigation of a possible terrorist cell; most Americans likely would agree that keeping such probes covert is smart. But it's quite another thing to hide the fact that our government is collecting what we thought was our private information.

Such secrecy only breeds suspicion and distrust of government — the very same problems that candidate Obama decried years ago. Moreover, at this point, there appears to have been no good reason for keeping the phone-data collecting a secret in the first place. Does our government really think that actual terrorists don't suspect that their calls are being monitored? In fact, many Americans may have also assumed — correctly, it turns out — that Uncle Sam has been collecting their phone metadata as well.

So why all this secrecy? If this program is no big deal, as Obama says, and is perfectly legal, as his administration and members of Congress contend, then why not have an open, lengthy public debate about it? In fact, in yet another moment of jaw-dropping hypocrisy, Obama claimed late last week that he "welcomed" a debate about the program — after years of keeping it secret, and after his administration had already started contemplating a criminal prosecution of the person who exposed it.

Hypocrisy aside, Obama should live up to his word. He should declassify the program and we should have an open conversation about it. Feinstein claims that it has helped thwart terrorism. If true, let's hear the details. Let's talk about whether we think that, in the name of safety, it's okay for our government to keep track of all our phone calls.

The truth is that Obama and Feinstein already know the answer.

Three-Dot Roundup

The Oakland-East Bay area is the hottest housing market in the country, the San Francisco Business Times reported, citing a new survey. Home prices skyrocketed by 31.2 percent here in the past year — by far the largest increase nationwide. Real estate experts attributed the huge price jump to the lack of homes for sale. ... A judge ruled that the embattled American Indian charter schools in Oakland can remain open while they appeal a decision by the Oakland school board that revoked their licenses to operate because of a financial scandal, the San Francisco Chronicle reported. The charter schools have appealed to the Alameda County Board of Education, and can ultimately appeal to the state Board of Education. ... A conservative Republican working for the IRS said it was his idea, along with that of a colleague, to scrutinize Tea Party groups who requested nonprofit status, Reuters reported. The disclosure blew a hole in a Republican conspiracy theory that the White House had ordered the targeting of Tea Party groups. ... And Southern California Edison has decided to shutter its troubled San Onofre nuclear power plant and will focus on creating more renewable energy, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments will be removed.

Latest in Seven Days

  • Libby Schaaf's Moment

    The Oakland mayor's decision to publicly take on President Trump and his anti-immigration policies was not only politically smart, it was the right thing to do.
    • Mar 7, 2018
  • You're Not a Progressive If You're Also a NIMBY

    Why housing is a liberal imperative.
    • Feb 28, 2018
  • The Warriors' Empty Gesture

    The team's new Town jerseys and logo finally recognize Oakland after all these years. But they mean nothing if the Warriors refuse to pay their $40 million debt.
    • Feb 21, 2018
  • More »

Author Archives

  • 40 in 40

    For our 40th anniversary, we compiled a list of 40 of the Express' memorable in-depth reports and the topics we've loved writing about the most.
    • Oct 10, 2018
  • Turning the Page

    My commitment to regaining your trust.
    • Jul 18, 2018
  • More»

Most Popular Stories

  • The Express' November 2018 Endorsement Guide

    We endorse Schaaf, Ezzy Ashcraft, and Butt; along with Fortunato Bas, Thao, Middleton, and Whitaker for Oakland council and Knox White and Oddie for Alameda council.
  • Role Reversals in the Oakland Mayor's Race

    In the Oakland mayor's race, the normally staid Libby Schaaf has come out swinging, while one of her top challengers, the usually brash Cat Brooks, is acting more like a Fortune 500 CEO.
  • Richmond at a Crossroads

    The city is on the verge of an economic boom: Will Mayor Tom Butt, a longtime city official, lead it to prosperity, or will the Richmond Progressive Alliance take full control of City Hall?
  • Island Gone Wild

    This has been a crazy year in Alameda politics, and it's about to get crazier.
  • Oakland Council District 4 Is a Wide-Open Contest

    With the incumbent quitting, the race features seven candidates, including three who are running as a slate.

Special Reports

Fall Arts 2018

Our Picks for the Best Events of the Fall Arts Season

The Queer & Trans Issue 2018

Stories about creating safe spaces in the Queer and Trans community.

© 2018 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation