Letters for the week of May 18-24, 2005 

Our account of the row between Patrick McCullough and the attorney for the young man he shot provokes much discussion about race.

"Most Successful Supplicant," Best of the East Bay, 4/6

Best actor
Thank you so much for listing Will Work for Food or $ in your recent Best of the East Bay. I wake up to find myself the Most Successful Supplicant. What a treat! Was there widespread competition? Did I beat out a field of hundreds? No matter; best not to know. What is important is that the people of the East Bay saved my life with work, money, and kindness when I had to beg. What an exquisite time. They will never be forgotten.

Will Work for Food or $ records that time and what it was like to be there. But it is also a record of someone finding his calling. So, while you say I became a gardener, which is true, it is equally true that I became an actor. And if I may append a plug to the medal you have so generously given, I have acted from that day to this, and am presently rehearsing Of Mice and Men to be done at the Belrose Theatre in San Rafael, June 10 to July 30. So you see -- even better!

Thank you again, and, as I learned to say on the roadside -- God bless you.
Bruce Moody, Crockett

"Take Back the Night, Part II," City of Warts, 4/27

Take back the right
I take strong issue with Chris Thompson's gross distortion of what I said to him as well as his statement about antipornography feminists in general. He claimed that "Now, antiporn feminists increasingly turn to born-again Christians in their search for allies, as Russell did at a visit to Southern California's Vanguard University last year." Firstly, I did not go to Vanguard University (a Christian institution) to search for allies. I went to earn money and to share my views on pornography. I will do this for any group who will pay me my requested fee.

Secondly, I told Thompson that the students who initiated a two-hour discussion session after my formal speech and presentation of pornography appeared to be very receptive to my radical feminist analysis of this misogynist propaganda. Following this discussion, a large group of them went to picket pornography stores and movie houses in the nearby shopping area. I would have happily joined them had I not been exhausted.

More importantly, on what basis does Thompson assume that the Christians I spoke to were "born-again" types? Indeed, he appears to assume that ALL Christians are such. If "born-again" is a code word for Christian fundamentalist, MY assumption is that millions of Christians cannot be so identified. Furthermore, Christian fundamentalists would almost certainly not be receptive to feminist reasons for opposing pornography, i.e., the misogyny inherent in it, and the fact that exposure and masturbation to such material reinforces misogynistic attitudes and cognitive distortions as well as promoting misogynistic behavior, including rape in some cases.

As one of the founding members of Women Against Violence in Pornography and Media in San Francisco in 1976, the first feminist antipornography organization in the United States, the women attending our meetings were divided regarding opposition to prostitution and the practice of sadomasochism. Although I personally found this difficult to understand and was myself strongly opposed to both prostitution and sadomasochism, we agreed to disagree on these issues, and to focus exclusively on our shared opposition to pornography. Many people believe in having coalitions between groups with different beliefs for certain purposes, for example, opposing the election of George Bush. Similarly, right, liberal, and left-wing gay men may agree to work together on shared issues such as legalizing gay marriage. It seems to be only the very few radical antipornography feminists who believe in sometimes working with Christians or Republicans -- however temporarily -- who are attacked for so doing.

Finally, I don't believe that Thompson is correct in saying that antipornography feminists are increasingly working with Christians now. It seems that his distorted story about me is cited as the only "evidence" for this.
Diana E.H. Russell, Ph.D, Berkeley

"Baiting the 59th Street Vigilante," East Side Story, 4/27

Race in Oakland, part 1
I have read Justin Berton's article in your previous publication about the case involving Patrick McCullough and my client Melvin McHenry. For the record, Justin Berton's article was at best 30 to 40 percent accurate and that is being generous. I find it so very impressive that Justin Berton seemed to hear everything I said everywhere at the scene and everything everyone else said and then of course be everywhere at all times. I don't recall him being anywhere around me most of the time, but who wants to ruin a good story with accurate facts? In addition, Justin Berton's "handwritten notes" that "paraphrased" my interaction with Patrick McCullough were also woefully off the mark.

This case is a real-life dispute in our city of Oakland. It is not a joke or vehicle of entertainment, as Justin Berton attempts to portray. I was born and raised in Oakland. I went to the Oakland public schools all the way through. I played baseball virtually every day (and at night during the summer) for many years, either at Bushrod Park or at Fruitvale Field. Bushrod Park is my neighborhood, and always will be. I take great offense at Justin Berton characterizing me as an outsider and then stating I intentionally put on some kind of show for the press, using nothing more than hearsay statements to back up his ridiculous, slanderous quotes. If anyone is an outsider, it is Justin Berton. Where is he from?

I have nothing against Patrick McCullough. I am saddened by this entire situation and what it has become. I hope we can -- and we all should -- make peace, move forward, and even perhaps find what we have in common. It could be more than you think. We are all in this together, trying to make the city of Oakland a better place. As Martin Luther King Jr. so eloquently stated, "Let us all sit down together at the table of brotherhood." So do not let some writer from your publication who is trying to write a story use our city for his own reasons, that of writing a story. We are better than that.
Ivan W. Golde, attorney for Melvin McHenry, Oakland

Race in Oakland, part 2
Justin Berton characterizes the press conference in support of Melvin McHenry and his family as "surreal." His article supports the views of Patrick McCullough, whom he calls a "righteous homeowner" and portrays as the victim.

Berton is the one living in a dream world if he thinks that it is okay for a 49-year-old man to shoot a sixteen-year-old kid under the guise of fighting drugs. McCullough is an armed thug who has, over the years, proven that he is hostile to his own community by pinning the billion-dollar drug trade on poor African kids on his street and serving as the point person for white property owners who want to "clean up the neighborhood." Most recently, McCullough showed his love for "his street" by shooting sixteen-year-old Melvin McHenry while McHenry was running away.


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments will be removed.

Latest in Letters

Most Popular Stories

Special Reports

The Beer Issue 2020

The Decade in Review

The events and trends that shaped the Teens.

Best of the East Bay


© 2020 Telegraph Media    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation