Letters for the week of August 3-9, 2005 

Supporters of evolution think Phillip Johnson is Cro-Magnon, plus the Wayans brothers army sets us straight about them.

Page 2 of 3

Earthquake insurance is a rip-off
Seismic upgrading may be your cheap alternative compared to the long-term cost of earthquake insurance and your potential loss risk, even with insurance. If you and your neighbors earthquake-retrofit your homes, you have a far, far better chance of surviving the earthquake shaken, but safe and intact.

Earthquake insurance is a personal decision. I am not trying to talk you out of earthquake insurance. However, the former director of the California Seismic Safety Commission, Dr. Lloyd S. Cluff, has publicly stated "Earthquake insurance is a rip-off." People who purchase earthquake insurance may not be getting the financial protection they believe they are. The California Earthquake Authority insures about 90 percent of the homes in California, and has a 15 percent deductible. For a $300,000 home, you would have to suffer $45,000 in losses before you could collect a cent. A loss this size would be devastating to most families. This is about four times the anticipated $12,000 cost (4 percent of the value of your home) of retrofitting. This is relatively cheap compared to your potential losses. An adequately reinforced home is far less likely to suffer significant damage from an earthquake.

Most people will have damage less than the deductible, which means that only a very small percentage of policy holders will ever collect anything. Furthermore, earthquake insurance is currently grossly underfunded. Even if you have a total collapse, you may only collect 25 or fifty cents on the dollar (after the $45,000 deductible). Adequately retrofitting your home is probabilitywise the most cost-effective way to save money, personal possessions, and personal misery when the next big earthquake comes. Most earthquake experts put their money into earthquake-retrofitting their homes and do not carry earthquake insurance because they know a well-secured home will survive a major earthquake with only minor damage.

Many of our homes are older, built before 1940, with comparatively weak foundations with shallow footings of bricks or poorer quality concrete, no foundation bolting, no shear walls, and often extensive foundation dry rot. Pre-1940 homes have a considerable risk of damage in an earthquake. ABAG estimates that 20 percent of the homes in the East Bay could collapse in a major Hayward earthquake.
Osman Vincent, Berkeley


"Popes, Perps, and Pills," Press Here, 7/27

Beneficial to mankind and no more fattening than sugar
We read with interest the July 27 article "Popes, Perps, and Pills," by Anneli Rufus, particularly the writer's use of the term "fattening" to define high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), a natural, homegrown sweetener from US cornfields. Please share the following information concerning HFCS with your readers:

HFCS contains approximately equal ratios of fructose and glucose similar to table sugar (sucrose). Sucrose and HFCS have the same caloric density as most carbohydrates; both contribute four calories per gram. The human body cannot discern a difference between HFCS, table sugar, and honey, because they are all nearly compositionally equivalent.

Recent mischaracterizations of HFCS as a unique cause of obesity do not represent the consensus opinion of scientific experts. The Center for Food and Nutrition Policy at Virginia Tech issued a report last year compiled by scientists who reviewed a number of critical commentaries about HFCS. Their analysis found that HFCS is not a unique contributor to obesity.

Your readers should know that HFCS has proven beneficial to consumers through its use in many foods and beverages, including several products that are specifically made for people trying to control their weight.

As a natural, nutritive sweetener, HFCS can be enjoyed as part of a balanced diet. According to the American Dietetic Association, "Consumers can safely enjoy a range of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners when consumed in a diet that is guided by current federal nutrition recommendations ... as well as individual health goals."
Audrae Erickson, president, Corn Refiners Association, Washington, DC


"Crapped in the Closet," Music, 7/20

While you're discussing slights to commercial products
Just wanted to correct you on your trashing of R. Kelly using Schick Quattro. First, Gillette was not the first razorblade manufacturer to have a three-bladed razor; I believe Kai was. Second, three-bladed razors have been out for over ten years, while Schick Quattro only came out in the past few years, not "immediately after." Not a big deal to you, I assume, but just like the most recent Geico commercial, "You should do some research first."
Stacy Masi, Wallingford, Connecticut


"Go Ahead, Tear Us Apart," Music, 7/27

What they need
Despite the original INXS' problems, or lack of hits, or whatever, the publicity they are getting is enormous. I've never cared for INXS, but after watching the show for three weeks, I've started listening.

In addition, what better way to rekindle the fire they had than to have America choose their lead singer? I've never watched American Idol, so I can't understand the Clarkson/Aiken success, but would those two have any kind of career if not for the millions who tuned in each week to see what would happen next? INXS is obviously trying for the same thing. Is that bad? Is it good? Haven't an idea, but why should they be castigated for wanting publicity for their reemergence?

Plus, what better way for a new singer to start out than with a multicity/country tour in big stadiums, plus a recording contract with an already-established band? The contestants have all apparently paid some of their dues, and are hoping the exposure on the show will lead to bigger and better things.

Not everyone cares for the same type of music. The band and the singers should be applauded for trying something different. There are a couple of singers on the show who are absolutely wonderful, and I am putting in my vote weekly to make sure they continue.
Donna Bass, Pacheco

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments will be removed.

Latest in Letters

Most Popular Stories

Special Reports

The Beer Issue 2020

The Decade in Review

The events and trends that shaped the Teens.

Best of the East Bay

2020

© 2020 Telegraph Media    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation