Letters for October 28 

Readers sound off on the BART connector, the Altamont wind farm, and privatizing Mosswood Park.

"There's No One in Charge," Full Disclosure, 9/23

There Are Smarter Transit Technologies

What needs to be explained about the Oakland Airport Connector is why the economic stimulus bill excluded more efficient and practical technology alternatives. Besides BRT, there are several competing Automated Rapid Transit technologies that are much more economical than outdated monorail and light rail. The challenge is getting government approval to demonstrate untested technology that can solve our future transportation needs virtually carbon-free. Companies like Oakland's own Cybertran International could build a much faster automated tram system for a price comparable to BRT, but the federal government is still committed to the past instead of the future. The US needs a public discussion of the urgent need to finally demonstrate the robotic ultra-light tram technologies that our economy will need.

Sennet Williams, Berkeley

"Altamont Bird Slaughter Worsens," Eco Watch, 9/30

Climate Change Threatens Birds

While well-intended, Robert Gammon's article suffers from the author's preconceptions about the controversy in the Altamont Pass and a lack of research. For one, Mr. Gammon's article relies on data from 2007 and prematurely concludes that wind turbines in the Altamont Pass are "shredding raptors at an increasing rate." Yet, as Dr. Smallwood of Alameda County's Scientific Review Committee explained later in the second to last paragraph of the article, everyone involved is waiting for the most recent mortality estimates to be released. Until the most recent mortality estimates are released, it is premature to conclude whether the wind companies' mortality reduction measures have worked.

Mr. Gammon's article fails to provide any context for wind energy or avian mortality in the Altamont or the complexity of the controversy. According to the National Audubon Society, climate change is expected to result in the loss of 25-33 percent of all species on earth, including many species of birds. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change anticipates that climate change will be the most significant driver in the loss of global biodiversity by the end of this century. In 2008, Governor Schwarzenegger issued a widely-lauded executive order to mandate that California get 33 percent of its power from renewable energy resources by 2020. Wind power is necessary to reach this goal and to minimizing impacts of climate change. Unfortunately, some degree of avian mortality appears inevitable wherever wind farms are developed.

Notably, Mr. Gammon's article fails to include interviews with representatives of the California Energy Commission, the California Department of Fish & Game, or the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service — the agencies tasked with regulating energy development and wildlife resources in California. For decades, none of these agencies acted to reduce avian mortality in the Altamont. 

Mike Boyd and Shawn Smallwood are right about many things. Too many birds continue to be killed in the Altamont unnecessarily. The settlement — to which CARE is a signatory — is a consensus document; and, we believe that the wind companies have not always met their obligations. We demanded that companies remove additional high-risk turbines after they missed some early deadlines. While we are concerned that the wind companies have not been adequately held accountable for the continued killing of birds in the Altamont, we all must wait for the most recent monitoring team report so that the Scientific Review Committee can determine whether measures implemented have been effective in reducing avian mortality in the Altamont.

We find it unfortunate that Mr. Boyd, or any observer, would consider Golden Gate Audubon (or any Audubon chapter) to be more "pro-wind" than "pro-bird." Our staff and volunteers dedicate every day to making the Bay Area a safer place for birds and other wildlife. Rather than offer cheap shots at those trying to solve these problems, we encourage everyone who cares about birds and other wildlife to get involved and help us solve this apparently intractable question: how do we develop new, renewable energy resources quickly and on a large scale in ways that protect current wildlife populations?

There are no easy answers, but we urge the East Bay Express' readers to help solve these problems by joining the stakeholder groups and public information meetings about wind power in the Altamont (and elsewhere) and by contacting their state legislators, the California Energy Commission, the Department of Fish & Game, and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to enforce environmental laws and implement policies that protect birds and other wildlife as California develops renewable energy projects. Only with input from the public and the full involvement of state and federal agencies will we even begin to develop new energy resources wisely.

Mark Welther, Executive Director, Golden Gate Audubon

Bob Power, Executive Director, Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society

"Deeper South," Restaurant Review, 10/7

Off the Wagon?

Has Anneli Rufus recently gone off her vegetarian diet? If so, fine. If not, why is she opining about dishes containing meat and seafood? Readers deserve full disclosure.

Robert Lauriston, Berkeley

Anneli Rufus Responds

In recent months, I have become a "flexitarian," following my doctor's advice, and now eat flesh about twice a month. That being said, in my reviews I never opine about a flesh dish if I haven't eaten it myself. If an opinion appears in one of my reviews about a flesh dish that I haven't eaten, it is the opinion of a carnivorous companion and is always cited as such.

"Seeking "Human" Rights for Corporations, Raising the Bar, 10/7

Consumers Arise

I was moved by Jay Youngdahl's story on Intel seeking human rights as a corporation. At the risk of sounding like a wacky conspiracy theorist, what if we see other multi-national corporations doing the same thing? The article made me wonder if — to paraphrase — "belittling humanity, and elevating corporations to god-like status" is not the object of the exercise. It seems the corporate world already sees the entire population of the world divided into Producers and Consumers with no other identity at all. They just want to make it the law.

Simon Rubenstein, Oakland

"A Homegrown Music Festival to Treasure," Music, 10/14

Our Fair Came Later

Camden, this ain't Chicago — which is to say, we didn't have a World's Fair in 1933. In 1939-40, New York had the World's Fair, while SF had the Golden Gate International Exposition (GGIE), for which TI was built.

Kevin Walsh, Emeryville

"Privatizing the Parks," News, 10/14

Privatization Is Beautiful

Thank you for your recent coverage of Kijiji's beautiful garden in Mosswood Park. I bike by Mosswood several days a week and have been delighted to see the garden area's revival since Keba and Eric started working there. Their long hours and talent have brought new life to the park and the neighborhood is better for it.Having witnessed Kijiji Grows in action, teaching youth and adult community residents about aquaponics and gardening with enthusiasm, I am thankful for their presence in Oakland and our community.  

Navina Khanna, Oakland


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments will be removed.

Latest in Letters

Most Popular Stories

Special Reports

The Beer Issue 2020

The Decade in Review

The events and trends that shaped the Teens.

Best of the East Bay


© 2020 Telegraph Media    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation