Just Say No 

Everything, and everyone, is less than zero in Roger Avary's cautionary tale.

Roger Avary's screenplay for The Rules of Attraction is a remarkable work of literature: The disassembly and reconstruction of an impenetrable book by Bret Easton Ellis; a simplification and amplification of the 1987 novel's attack on the bored, beautiful, and wealthy; a streamlined and mainlined version of a story originally told by some two dozen characters all narrating in the whiny-bitchy me-me-me first person. Where the novel ran on like a coke-binge bloody nose, the script has structure, makes sense, and gives the audience room to breathe, think, and maybe even feel something for these vapid characters as they run amok on a northeastern college campus. The script is less dizzying than the novel, but no less a thrill ride when characters speak and move in reverse, as actions rewind to offer different perspectives on events already witnessed.

The Ellis novel felt like little more than a lazy, hazy sequel to Less than Zero, itself the source material for one of the most patronizing just-say-no films made in the 1980s. Avary's script feels more like a sequel to Ellis' 1991 novel American Psycho (even though the chronology of the novels is the other way around), starring not the psycho killer, Patrick Bateman, but his spoiled little brother Sean, who displays his cruelty without use of blowtorch and hacksaw. Sean is as despicable as his older bro -- a different breed of killer. "I pretend to be a vampire," Sean says in voice-over, "and I don't really need to pretend, because it's who I am -- an emotional vampire."

Sean will, in fact, cause the death of someone who loves him deeply, but he's too self-absorbed to notice the effect he has on other people. He's dead in the eyes and in the heart -- a cipher, truly less than zero. And it's amazing how much depth James Van Der Beek, television's Dawson, brings to Sean's shallowness. His is a razor-sharp smirk, which he uses to get into girls' (and, when need be, boys') underwear when he's stoned enough to get it up. Van Der Beek, liberated from the shackles of prime-time TV, has a blast playing bad. It's astonishing that so emotionally moribund a character is the most energizing one in the entire film. Everyone else is just a pawn shuffled around on Avary's chessboard, someone to screw or do the screwing between Sean's scenes.

Of course, all these characters are incredibly screwed up: Paul Denton (Ian Somerhalder), the bisexual pretty boy with a thing for Sean; Lauren Hyde (Shannyn Sossamon), Paul's ex and a virgin who holds out for her dream lover, Victor, by staring at medical textbooks filled with close-ups of VD-riddled genitalia; Lara Holleran (7th Heaven's Jessica Biel), Lauren's horny roomie, who refuses to believe abstinence is 100 percent safe, because "I don't major in math"; Victor Johnson (Kip Pardue), who did Europe, quite literally; and a handful of minor players who spend the entire movie getting drunk, throwing up, shooting up, and falling down.

Avary's having fun here. That the Pulp Fiction cowriter works himself into a noble froth over so vacuous and unlikable an assemblage is almost admirable. He, like Mary Harron and Guinevere Turner before him in American Psycho, wants to elevate and redeem Ellis' books -- to make them resonate today, to keep them from becoming mere echoes of the moment in which they were written (Ellis' books were little more than reflections seen from whatever mirror his characters were cutting coke on). And Avary almost succeeds, because his passion almost pushes the mundane into the meaningful. You can feel how much he cares about them, and he nearly gets you to do the same.

By stripping away Ellis' blah-blah-blah, Avary cuts to the quick of the material: Sean, Lauren, and Paul just want to connect with someone, feel something, believe in anything; they're hollowed out, but not for lack of looking for that thing that will fill the void and give them depth and meaning and purpose. Somerhalder, especially, has the face of a kid yearning for connection and collapsing when he realizes it ain't ever gonna happen; he's a pretty boy who realizes his looks will get him nowhere and land him nothing, and his Paul has a sadness the book barely hints at. Sossamon, too, gives Lauren a warmth the book never seemed to acknowledge; by making her a victim at the film's beginning -- she's shown in a rather explicit rape scene played, in part, for grim and grimy laughs -- Avary puts us on her side. We want her to end up with Victor, and we're saddened and sickened in knowing she never can.

But for all its kinetic energy, for all its camera tricks, for all its dark humor, there's still something a bit off about these Rules, and it's not really Avary's fault. It's Ellis' and always has been, because deep down Ellis is a moralist -- a guy who likes writing about decadence, but at the end of the day he probably shuffles off to bed with a mug of warm milk. It's a dispiriting trick, getting us to revel in the muck only to offer the same old stale platitudes and warnings. This isn't a movie, but one more cautionary tale that would earn your mom's approval. Its message: Stay in school, don't do drugs, treat your parents with respect. Ugh.

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments will be removed.

Readers also liked…

Latest in Movie Review

Author Archives

Most Popular Stories

Special Reports

Holiday Guide 2016

A guide to this holiday season's gifts, outings, eats, and more.

Taste, Fall 2016

Everything you need to know about dining in and out in the East Bay.

© 2017 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation