john.q.piedmont 
Member since Jun 22, 2011


Stats

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “The Blair Park Project

If Jessica Berg's statement is correct, "We have looked at impacts in . . . Oakland in every way that we could," then why did Oakland write Piedmont on 3/21/2011: "The City remains concerned about Piedmont's failure to conduct any meaningful analysis of the project's environmental impacts." PRFO's plan can only succeed if the Piedmont City Council ignores the critically flawed analysis. Further, to have children cross Moraga avenue without a properly engineered and analyzed traffic plan is beyond irresponsible.

Posted by john.q.piedmont on 06/22/2011 at 2:44 PM

Re: “The Blair Park Project

One clarification: The PRFO proposal has consistently shown two fields, not three or one. Both fields were to use artificial turf, the smaller field will now use natural grass. This field is renamed "glade." The function remains the same as a practice sports field.

Posted by john.q.piedmont on 06/22/2011 at 9:56 AM

Readers' Favorites

Most Popular Stories


© 2018 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation