Fun With Misleading Mailers: The Big Oil Tax 

Deconstructing the political recyclables in your mailbox.

Mailer's stance: No on Prop. 87
Opposes new tax on oil extraction to fund alternative energy.

Key Funders
Chevron Corporation, Aera Energy LLC

"Prop 87 hurts our schools. ... The independent State Legislative Analyst says Prop. 87 will reduce state and local revenues that pay for schools, public safety, and other vital services."

A shameful attempt to divert the subject from taxing energy. First off, the legislative analyst never mentions schools, education, or public safety. Now let's do the math. Although producers will be allowed to deduct the oil tax from their state income taxes, the analyst estimates lost local tax revenues at no more than a few million dollars statewide. Estimated state income tax losses are no more than $10 million, and lost tax revenues from oil produced on state land would be $7 million to $15 million. Just for fun, let's use the nonsensical assumption that all of this money - let's be generous and call it $30 million - would come straight from the state's K-12 education budget. Well, that would mean a loss to the schools of four one-hundredths of a percent. That's right, baby: The fiscal 2006-07 schools budget is a plump $67.1 billion, and this proposition wouldn't so much as nick its surface.


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments will be removed.

Latest in Feature

Author Archives

  • Meet Mr. Wrong

    In the news biz, a small production error can create a big problem.
    • Aug 29, 2007
  • The Press-Shy Mayor

    Getting Ron Dellums on board with the media is an ongoing process, says his outgoing flack.
    • Aug 22, 2007
  • More»

Most Popular Stories

Special Reports

The Beer Issue 2020

The Decade in Review

The events and trends that shaped the Teens.

Best of the East Bay


© 2020 Telegraph Media    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation