A’s Wild Card Loss Leads to Offseason Questions 

Now that another October playoff has ended in heartbreak for Oakland, the A’s front office starts a pivotal offseason that will greatly affect the franchise’s plans to build a new park in The Town.

click to enlarge The Howard Terminal site got a boost last week when Gov. Jerry Brown signed AB 734, a state bill that will speed up the review process for lawsuits that might be filed over construction on the waterfront.
  • The Howard Terminal site got a boost last week when Gov. Jerry Brown signed AB 734, a state bill that will speed up the review process for lawsuits that might be filed over construction on the waterfront.

When strangers stop in the street to offer you their condolences, you know the night has taken a rough turn.

That was my cold reality after I left Yankee Stadium last Wednesday night, and later strolled through Harlem while contemplating New York’s 7-2 dismantling of the A’s.

An hour after the Wild Card Game, a grizzled, middle-age man wearing a Chicago White Sox hat saw your faithful correspondent — unprofessionally but enthusiastically wearing green and gold — and lowered his eyes in sympathy.

“What are ya’ gonna do?” he said softly, shrugging.

He repeated in a slower cadence to no one in particular on Frederick Douglass Boulevard: “What. Are. You. Gonna. Do?”

Ah, human kindness. After navigating a sea of boozy, mouthy Pinstripe fans for hours in the Bronx, I appreciated it. And, unwittingly, my kindly condoler and temporary street philosopher had cut to the core of the A’s’ post-October dilemma. Now that the Yankees had turned yesterday’s miracle season into today’s silly dream, the A’s front office now must focus on tomorrow.



The Wild Card Game drubbing left them with no other choice. That’s the worst part of the crushing finality of a playoff loss — it forces you to face nothing but a long winter of hard questions. Such as:

Hey, John Fisher, are you finally going to open your checkbook like a real owner? Billy Beane and David Forst (the A’s execs in charge of player personnel), where and how will you add the few missing pieces this talented roster needs without blowing up the whole thing? And, Dave Kaval, how will the Oakland ballpark hunt continue?

In short, fellas, when it comes to the thorny issues most affecting the future of the franchise, what are you gonna do?

Kaval, for his part, has wasted no time in continuing public outreach for the A’s’ new home. Four days after the playoff loss, the team hosted a community meeting in West Oakland, where residents shared their thoughts about the Howard Terminal waterfront site. Future meetings reportedly are planned at other Oakland locations. Holding a number of gatherings like this is the smart and right thing to do, showing that the franchise has learned from its failure at the Laney College site.

Also, the Howard Terminal site got a boost last week when Gov. Jerry Brown signed AB 734, a state bill that will speed up the review process for lawsuits that might be filed over construction on the waterfront. Meanwhile, the A’s continue to offer $137 million to buy the 110-acre Coliseum property, either to build a new stadium there or to develop the East Oakland land to help pay for a waterfront ballpark.

As Kaval and his team make progress on the pair of Oakland sites, equal attention will be paid to offseason roster decisions made by Beane and Forst. The 2019 opening day ages of nearly all A’s position players currently under team control will range from 23 to 28. (The exceptions are Khris Davis and Mark Canha.). In other words, a slew of quality players will spend their prime years in Oakland, which is music to A’s fans’ ears. To their credit, Beane and Forst again have built a young team poised to contend for a title over the next half-decade. Oakland baseball’s future looks bright.

But don’t forget, this is the Oakland A’s. Nothing comes easy.

Winter is coming — which means major, franchise-altering roster decisions loom. Second baseman Jed Lowrie, who turns 35 next April, and catcher Jonathan Lucroy, 32, are free agents this offseason. Davis, meanwhile, is eligible for arbitration and has another season before he hits free agency in 2020. But I include him here with Lowrie and Lucroy because each player is on the wrong side of 30 and will be pricey to re-sign.

I’d like to see the A’s keep at least two of the trio. It would hurt to lose Lowrie, but I could understand if they let him walk. He’s at the age where athletes start to decline. And even though he just completed a very good season, he’s a risk because he’s been injury-prone throughout his career. Also, the A’s have young infielder Franklin Barreto — as well as utility man Chad Pinder — ready to take Lowrie’s spot.

Lucroy and Davis, for whom the A’s lack immediate replacements, are another story. In the Beane era, the A’s have often told players like them to pack their bags. But the team cannot and must not do that this offseason — not if they want a skeptical media and weary fan base to take their ballpark efforts seriously.

Lucroy has always been a solid, durable player and he did a great job providing defense and stability for a pitching staff wracked by injuries this season. He’s earned a good contract.

Davis, meanwhile, has emerged as one of MLB’s best sluggers. Among all A’s players, he has been the most vocal about his love for Oakland — not the “Bay Area” or “Northern California” but, specifically, Oakland. For a franchise that smartly made “Rooted in Oakland” its slogan, the front office should reciprocate Davis’ loyalty to The Town with a long-term deal. Oh, and his 133 homers and 335 RBIs over the past three seasons in Oakland make a pretty good case for re-signing him, too.

Sure, the team also could use a No. 1 starting pitcher but, a) almost every other team needs one, too, and b) one crisis at a time, please. Let’s just start with keeping Davis and Lucroy in The Town.

Kaval has put on a clinic on how to market a team to a community. If that’s the “talk the talk” part of rebuilding the A’s fan base, then Fisher and Beane must “walk the walk” by re-signing some star free agents.

As for the fans, we all know the script for gut-wrenching playoff exits. We’re well-practiced in saying things like:

- “Tough ending, but just appreciate what a great season it was!”
- “They’re young, so this is just the beginning of a great era!”
- “We’re just one [pick a position] away — wait until next year!”
- “We were the underdogs, we weren’t even supposed to be here!”

Yes, I see the logic in each of these takes. This time, however, all of those same old platitudes left me feeling cold. And totally unconvinced.

Let’s not so easily accept the false narrative that the A’s are mere guests at MLB’s playoff party, to which we’re supposed to feel grateful for just being invited.

Yeah, no.

Instead, let’s show some self-esteem and aim higher. Oakland is a city steeped in baseball history and the A’s are one of MLB’s most storied franchises. The A’s play in a Top 6 media market whose residents rank among the nation’s wealthiest. So, it’s time for Fisher, one of MLB’s richest owners, to stop pretending otherwise.

There are many, many reasons for A’s fans to feel optimistic about 2019. Yet this offseason finds the franchise at a major crossroads. The future of the Oakland A’s hangs precariously on one question. And, to be specific, we’ll pose it once again to Fisher and Beane, pertaining to their willingness this winter to spend money when necessary on players’ salaries:

What are you gonna do?

Chris De Benedetti, a co-founding member of Baseball Oakland, writes a regular sports column for the Express.

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments will be removed.

Latest in The Oakland Zone

  • A’s-Yankees Wild Card Could Be a Classic

    The win-or-die playoff between Oakland and New York on Wednesday will be a true David vs. Goliath contest, as the unheralded A’s prepare to battle those damn Yankees in Gotham.
    • Oct 1, 2018
  • A’s’ ‘Bullpenning’ Might Be a Bit Much

    It might win some key games in the short-term, but it can also divide a clubhouse.
    • Sep 11, 2018
  • Gruden’s Honeymoon Is Already Over

    The head coach’s second Raiders tenure has already gotten rocky, as trading Kahlil Mack reflects the kind of self-destructive arrogance that has plagued the franchise for years.
    • Sep 5, 2018
  • More »

Author Archives

Most Popular Stories

  • The Express' November 2018 Endorsement Guide

    We endorse Schaaf, Ezzy Ashcraft, and Butt; along with Fortunato Bas, Thao, Middleton, and Whitaker for Oakland council and Knox White and Oddie for Alameda council.
  • A Guide to Oakland's Ballot Measures

    Six measures on the November ballot include new taxes, tax breaks, changes to existing taxes, worker and tenant protections, and education funding.
  • Role Reversals in the Oakland Mayor's Race

    In the Oakland mayor's race, the normally staid Libby Schaaf has come out swinging, while one of her top challengers, the usually brash Cat Brooks, is acting more like a Fortune 500 CEO.
  • Richmond at a Crossroads

    The city is on the verge of an economic boom: Will Mayor Tom Butt, a longtime city official, lead it to prosperity, or will the Richmond Progressive Alliance take full control of City Hall?
  • A New Berkeley Council?

    With two longtime councilmembers retiring and two vulnerable newcomers defending their seats, half of the city council could be gone next year.

Special Reports

Fall Arts 2018

Our Picks for the Best Events of the Fall Arts Season

The Queer & Trans Issue 2018

Stories about creating safe spaces in the Queer and Trans community.

© 2018 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation