William Smith 
Member since Jul 13, 2018


Stats

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “The 'Real Alamedans'

All sides of the rent control debate make valid points. All sides also gloss over valid points that undermine their position. A real debate among the sides rather than vitriolic exchanges could ultimately lead to more housing for every income level. In his comment above Mr. Foreman is correct: ACT's policy of opposing market rate housing to increase the pressure on governments and tech companies to build or finance affordable housing is worth considering.

However, given ACT's long history of opposing housing developments and their silence on the few all affordable housing developments that have been built, such as the recently opened Stargell Commons, ACT's motives for opposing market rate housing remain unclear. If ACT actively supported affordable housing projects for more than seniors, the proposed Health and Wellness Center for the homeless on McKay Avenue, and bonds and other measures to fund housing, more progressives might accept their claimed motive for opposing market rate housing. But at least on the point of market rate housing in Alameda ultimately making the shortage of affordable housing here worse, ACT is right, and many progressives are wrong.

The tech companies that many progressives ally with (e.g. Brian Hanlon of California YIMBY [Yes In My Back Yard]) promote market rate housing, which helps the companies recruit, and so far have shown little concern for where the service workers that support their businesses and employees will live.
If we are to build market rate housing without increasing the number of affordable units we are short in the future, I estimate that we need to build between 1.5 and 2 affordable units for every market rate unit.

For the basis of my estimate, refer to the description of the Affordable Housing and Preservation Alternative I wrote that is in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Alameda Marina Master Plan posted on a City Website.

Let's do more than exchange vitriol - let's debate.

Posted by William Smith on 07/13/2018 at 8:41 AM

Readers' Favorites

Most Popular Stories

  • Towing for Dollars in Alameda

    Since 2013, more than 1,400 vehicles have been towed from one West End apartment complex by one company: PPI Towing.
  • The East Bay's Tow Hustle

    Towing companies are taking cars illegally, and it's costing people. One of the worst offenders is PPI Towing of Oakland.
  • Pro-Tenant and Pro-Housing

    East Bay voters made it clear that they favor candidates who advocate not only for more renter protections and more homeless services, but also, more housing.
  • The Problems With Bioplastics

    People mistakenly try to recycle them, thereby contaminating the waste stream. Plus, they're not really compostable.
  • Maejoo Is Small But Mighty

    The modern yet petite San Leandro Korean restaurant offers limited seating and menu options, but delivers on quality and taste.

© 2018 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation