Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Narrow by Date

Comment Archives: Last 7 Days

Re: “Opinion: Getting the Shaft From Schaaf

Services and staff salaries & benefits come out of the same budget. We need to preserve enough money to improve services for Oakland citizens.

Posted by Hugh Morrison 1 on 12/09/2017 at 5:22 PM

Re: “Opinion: Getting the Shaft From Schaaf

It was Mayor Quan who actually paved the way for more money to come into Oakland, not Mayor Schaaf who gets the credit. It was also Quan, who cut her own salary and staff to help make ends meet at the City. That previous mayor set a better example of more fairness across the board so that Oakland City could get past the recession back then.

However, in a better economy, Mayor Schaaf is great at spending on everything else, except for the real employees who do the work that keeps the City going.

Mayor Schaaf benefited from the previous mayor's ability to fix the budget. The money flowed in as soon as Mayor Schaaf stepped in. Schaaf saw a lot of funds coming through, so she raised her own salary and increased her administrative staff with more high salaries very quickly. Regular employees did not get that benefit.

Why do lesser paid City employees and part-time staff have to be the ones to continue making sacrifices? Mayor Schaaf is following the Jerry Brown method. We know how Jerry screwed California in order to create a huge reserve that no one can touch. Mayor Schaaf appears to want to imitate his model of governing.

If Mayor Schaaf is genuinely concerned about her employees she could set a better example if she made major sacrifices too by cutting her own salary and administrative staff. She needs to feel the pain the majority of City employees are going through, but how can she when she and her administration make six figure salaries? That's way more than the average City worker makes.

She can always go home and live more than comfortably while City workers worry how they will make ends meet and continue to live in the City they serve.

Posted by Kit Vaq on 12/09/2017 at 5:20 PM

Re: “Oakland Schools Supe Proposes Reducing Cuts from $15 Million to $9 Million

Why isn't the BOE having Charters share in the costs?

Whether one supports Charters or not (or only supports successful Charters) it seems unfair to have only traditional schools be impacted.

This is going to cause more families to flee traditional OUSD schools, decreasing enrollment next year...and then the problem will become even worse.

Posted by Hugh Morrison 1 on 12/09/2017 at 4:33 PM

Re: “Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf Says: The Remedy is More Women in Power Now

To Kathleen Richards, who apparently requested this piece by Mayor Libby Schaaf:

Whatever the inspiration for this piece of writing, the writer remains, in my view, an exploiter of a current media trend rather than a contributor of insight to a discussion which can certainly benefit from thoughtful and incisive reflection.

As an example, Schaaf says that women need to occupy more powerful positions. I would suggest that a more useful perspective would be to say that women need to occupy more responsible positions and that characteristics of such responsibility be explored.

Thus I wrote that rather than merely appointing a woman as Oakland's Police Chief, our Police Department might work toward having more like 50% female officers. That could indeed introduce a new level of female responsibility, as well as power, which would benefit all Oaklanders by having cops who are less violently macho, more able to listen to community concerns and more compassionate while still being capable of enforcing the law.

In the case of Mayor Schaaf herself I would suggest that she has abundant power of all sorts in her office but she has largely failed to adequately shoulder the responsibilities that her office requires.

Posted by Hobart Johnson on 12/09/2017 at 3:22 PM

Re: “Opinion: Getting the Shaft From Schaaf

I support these courageous Oakland workers for standing up for their families and whats left of the middle class! Public please dont be fooled by Libby Schaff. She is only serving herself and the powerful special interests who fund her campaigns. She wants those who provide the services and can no longer afford to live in the City they serve to continue to sacrifice so she can give City taxpayers money to developers and tax breaks to huge businesses who give nothing back to the City. Stay strong Oakland workers!! Weve got your backs!!

Posted by sstalbaum on 12/09/2017 at 1:34 PM

Re: “Opinion: Getting the Shaft From Schaaf

There is money in implementing prop 64. I know this for a fact since I used to work for a collective with my ex husband who decided he didn't want to make things the right way by paying for government taxes along with getting a seller's permit for a marijuana grow operation we had in the Oakland Hills. Now, I left him because of this and there is still money going through that house.

Posted by Crystle Dean on 12/09/2017 at 11:05 AM

Re: “Opinion: Getting the Shaft From Schaaf

I support these workers and their struggle for a fair wage. As to the mayor, she has slowly turned Oakland into a trash heap.

Posted by Patrick Beadle on 12/09/2017 at 11:03 AM

Re: “Opinion: Getting the Shaft From Schaaf

Union workers are fighting for their families. They don't want to "fit in" and join the race to the bottom. And the Oakland workers are definitely not "under skilled" and "under educated." They have to do well in very competitive civil service exams to be hired. Their performances are evaluated annually. They have to pass a probation period. Unions are the best hope of maintaining a middle class, despite attempts to diminish and break them.

Support these folks. The decent salaries and benefits they have struggled for may one day belong to your kids.

Posted by Margaret Cunningham on 12/09/2017 at 5:35 AM

Re: “Opinion: Getting the Shaft From Schaaf

I agree with Ali that workers were misled by the Mayor when times were hard. As she has shown over and over again, Mayor Schaaf, wearing her phony "I'm so concerned" face, says things in a moment of crisis that she has no way of delivering. That my friends is not leadership. With that being said, the unions and all public employees need to take a look at what is happening in the labor force in the entire economy. To only consider comparable salaries in other local agencies is naive, short sighted and negligent on the part of the union. Here is the reality of where we are in 2017. It has been much celebrated that we are in the "new economy", with the bay area leading the movement. Look at how Uber and AirbnB position themselves in regards to labor. NOT having employees is a part of their business model. Everybody is an independent contractor, responsible for their own insurance and benefits. AirbnB claims to be a short term transient occupancy or hotel option, but they own no hotels. Uber and Lyft are car services that own no cars. Nobody is paying the kinds of wages and benefits that public employees are historically used to receiving. That is already a dying 20th century labor relationship that the private sector and increasingly the public sector are moving away from. Rising health care costs and pension obligations are making that kind of employment increasingly unsustainable for cities. Look at how the City budget is carved up.The majority of the money goes to Police and Fire costs. The two places where frankly, their unions have over time, milked the City for extremely generous lifetime benefit packages. Don't ever forget that to some extent, unions are about their own existence and ability to survive. Part time and contract employees are the only way that many cities can provide services and combat the unsustainable position they are in. Responsible union leadership should be honest with employees about the reality of labor in the current economic context and form a realistic strategy moving forward that serves the workers and allows them to go back to work. Nobody should be out of work at Christmas. That is especially true for many of these strikers who are under skilled and under educated when compared overall to the bay area workforce. This is not 1965, it is almost 2018 and union workers need to look around and be realistic about where they fit in.

Posted by Gary Patton on 12/09/2017 at 4:51 AM

Re: “Opinion: Getting the Shaft From Schaaf

The Mayor is "showing us" how tough she is by insisting employees do more with less. She didn't start discussions about wages until May, when the budget was already set. Since then she has offered 0%, only recently agreeing to 2%. Her charming cheerleader act has fallen by the wayside, and her true character is emerging. She's given us an ultimatum, and hired a strike-breaking attorney to ensure no further negotiations occur. The Council members, with the exception of Desley Brooks, just follow in lockstep. Reminds me of another current administration!
If you want to know who to "believe", just look around at increasing number of homeless people, piles of mattresses and trash on the streets and potholes everywhere. There is not enough of us to keep up with the needs, and then we can't afford to live here either.

Posted by Dragon_FLY_on on 12/08/2017 at 9:30 PM

Re: “Opinion: Getting the Shaft From Schaaf

SEIU Local 1021, my union, didn't accept the City's last, best, and final offer because -- among other issues -- it throws temporary part-time (TPT) workers under the bus. These are people working hard in our city, people who aren't getting a fair deal and are often cobbling together a patchwork of jobs to make ends meet. I care that good TPTs jump ship when they get a full-time offer somewhere else, because they need to pay their bills and support their families. I think they should have retirement and health benefits, and the opportunity to become permanent and/or full-time workers for Oakland.

The City offered to fund the conversion of some TPT library staff to full-time positions, in exchange for the union dropping the class-action lawsuit against the City for the overuse and abuse of TPTs citywide, and with no similar action to promote the rights of TPTs in other departments. Think Oakland Library workers would do that to their counterparts in Public Works or Transportation? I don't think the City leadership understands the helping professions. Or solidarity.

Posted by Oakland Librarian on 12/08/2017 at 8:47 PM

Re: “Watch Oakland Chefs Tanya Holland and Tu David Phu Compete on Top Chef

Im always suspicious of commenters who try to take people down instead of building people up...

Posted by John Rzeznik on 12/08/2017 at 7:55 PM

Re: “Peralta Faculty and Laney Students Vote to Oppose New A's Stadium Plan

I think you are missing some points! Gentrification is and will happen, it is called progress. The A's were willing to listen and work with the community for the benefit of all citizens. Your reasons saying they are going to do this or that is premature. They called for an honest evaluation of all concerns. You bullied up and became nimby's

Posted by Edward Silveira on 12/08/2017 at 5:02 PM

Re: “Opinion: Getting the Shaft From Schaaf

This woman is so brave! I live in downtown Oakland and I fully support these workers. Oakland is doing well $$ and the workers deserve a piece of that. Otherwise they will leave and go work for other cities that pay them 10% more! That doesnt help our community. We need a good city workforce who are talented and hard-working. Give them a fair raise so they can get back to work!

Posted by Emma Jane on 12/08/2017 at 4:56 PM

Re: “Opinion: Getting the Shaft From Schaaf

Libby Schaaf is a Republican in Democratic clothing. She doesnt care about Oakland just getting into higher office.

Posted by on 12/08/2017 at 4:56 PM

Re: “California Attorney General: Oakland's Coal Ban Is Legal

Heck yah, screw you Kentucky! Take your coal elsewhere.

Posted by Jay78 on 12/08/2017 at 4:00 PM

Re: “California Attorney General: Oakland's Coal Ban Is Legal

State Planning law clearly grants local government specific police powers, including the regulation of land use. Additionally, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) doubles down on the responsibility of lead agencies to protect California citizens from significant environmental impacts generated by those land uses. Tagami never had a chance of winning in court and should be spending his time and money trying to find a use for the site that will actually work. In typical Tagami fashion, he used his political favors and friends to get in position to control the site. He then then tried to bully the City into accepting a coal related use that nobody in Oakland wants. I applaud the West Oakland neighborhood for holding the City Council accountable and stopping this project.

Posted by Gary Patton on 12/08/2017 at 3:57 PM

Re: “Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf Says: The Remedy is More Women in Power Now

To the poster, Hobart Johnson, who accuses the mayor of "jump[ing] upon the current media bandwagon regarding sexual exploitation of women": To be clear, I asked the mayor -- just as I asked all the other women whose essays appear in this week's paper -- to write about this issue. It was not her idea.

Posted by Kathleen Richards on 12/08/2017 at 3:36 PM

Re: “Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf Says: The Remedy is More Women in Power Now

What is deeply disgusting and upsetting about Schaafs opinion piece ought to be made perfectly clear.

Schaaf is referring for her own political purposes to a very important socioeconomic problem having to do with power differentials between men and women and between adults and children.

Its not just about women--its about sexual (and economic) exploitation of those in less powerful positions (children as well as women) being exploited by those in more powerful positions.

Schaafs work in elected political office has been at best mediocre and in the main has been less-than-competent. Thus she jumps upon the current media bandwagon regarding sexual exploitation of women. Nothing could be more cynical than this politicized PR effort.

I happen to agree with what Schaaf says about putting more women in positions of power. I am talking about real action, not posturing.

In one particular place, in Oakland, there could be enormous social benefit: greatly increasing the number of female cops. It is well-recognized in contemporary policing that qualified women are likely to make superior police officers. I do know about this from personal experience.

Have we seen a program from Schaaf for working towards 50% of Oakland cops being female? A female Police Chief is not at all the same thing.

Wonder why not? Its the difference between real understanding, real leadership and leadership and managerial incompetence and political exploitation.

Posted by Hobart Johnson on 12/08/2017 at 11:33 AM

Re: “Oakland School Board Members Apologize for Mid-Year Budget Cuts at Packed Board Meeting

Most of the students that this money was earmarked for are truant --if their parents cant afford to go to to a dollar store to get them paper and pencils what more can I say --the tax payers should not be stuck with their negligent parenting -- let alone the preferential treatment which in itself is discrimination--

Posted by Ima Hemp on 12/08/2017 at 10:32 AM

Most Popular Stories

© 2017 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation