Narrow Search

Comment Archives: stories: News & Opinion

Re: “City of Oakland ‘Bulldozer’ Hit A Homeless Man While He Was Sleeping In A Tent

Where are the inhabitants supposed to put the trash from the encampment if there is no regular trash collection? And it's not clear that some of it isn't illegal dumping by people taking advantage of the unsupervised nature of the areas where the encampments are. If you look at the stuff, lots of the bulky items are things the people in the encampments could not have carried there.

Posted by Valerie Winemiller on 06/01/2017 at 9:04 PM

Re: “Oakland Officials Question Police Partnerships with Federal Immigration Agents and FBI

Libby and the Oakland City Council need to take immediate action to keep ICE out of Oakland. They would not allow a federal agency to come terrorize Mountclarions, so they should leave the backdoor open for these bullies to come in and harass and arrest immigrants and POC. LIbby and and Annie say, they are all about justice and fairness, time to put your policies where you say your values are.

Posted by Ann Nomura on 06/01/2017 at 7:40 PM

Re: “City of Oakland ‘Bulldozer’ Hit A Homeless Man While He Was Sleeping In A Tent

Lets see... 160 cubic yards (to use the smallest figure quoted). What can that mean? It could mean a debris field about 3 feet deep, 3 feet wide and 18 feet long. That's a hell of a lot of trash accumulated in one location! I doubt it was really that compact, but we can set that aside for now.

What are the implications of this? Hmmm... Home for vermin? (rats, mice, roaches and any other disease ridden creepy crawlies we can think of in an urban environment). Sound like anything you want anyone living around? Not me.

How about just simple paper and other burnable junk... Had some fires that wiped out a tent city recently, didn't we? People hurt? Wonder how that happened, huh?

As to the use of industrial equipment to clear it... How many back breaking human (expensive) man hours would it take to clean it otherwise? Yeah, the equipment operators need to be a LOT more careful but it's disingenuous to paint this as anything but what needs to be done.

Since all the "stuff" didn't accumulate itself, it's equally clear the inhabitants aren't doing much to clear it themselves.

I don't have a good solution, but more care needs to be taken on the part of all parties.

Posted by Bruce Ferrell on 06/01/2017 at 5:47 PM

Re: “A New Oakland A's Ballpark: Our Writer Looks At The Good, The Bad, And The Unknown Of Three Rumored Sites

@Bruce Ferrell

Your comment is short sighted at best. The A's have committed to a privately financed stadium now for a while. Yes, they will get some support re land and infrastructure that will benefit the ENTIRE CITY.

The stadium has the chance to reinvigorate the city and CREATE jobs and tax revenue and be a source of civic pride. The city needs to expand it's tax base, and a new A's stadium in a location that can draw in the casual sports fan creates a ripple effect in the source of tax collars that help all of the issues that you listed above. While I've yet to see an official report, my guess is a ballpark in HT would generate far more jobs (restaurants, stadium employees, construction to improve transport from BART to the park) than would be lost at the port. It's not like new port companies are lining up to use HT...

Posted by Damon M on 06/01/2017 at 10:51 AM

Re: “Berkeley To Consider Banning Plastic Straws

Hey Carl, crawl back in your Trump Hole

Posted by Vincent Blafard on 06/01/2017 at 10:39 AM

Re: “A New Oakland A's Ballpark: Our Writer Looks At The Good, The Bad, And The Unknown Of Three Rumored Sites

I'd go for the Laney College site. Real inner City location. Great pedestrian and transit access. Great views of Lake Merritt. Shared use by Laney College students.

Posted by bayarched98 on 06/01/2017 at 10:06 AM

Re: “A New Oakland A's Ballpark: Our Writer Looks At The Good, The Bad, And The Unknown Of Three Rumored Sites

Go A's! You can have some of my tax money if you need it.

Posted by John Seal on 06/01/2017 at 9:06 AM

Re: “A New Oakland A's Ballpark: Our Writer Looks At The Good, The Bad, And The Unknown Of Three Rumored Sites

I'm happy if the A's build a stadium with private money. Not one penny of public money, property, or tax rebates is to be involved.

Posted by Ernest Montague on 06/01/2017 at 8:22 AM

Re: “Oakland Expends Considerable Money and Person-Power Displacing Homeless Residents, According to City Records

Hey Mitchell Halberstadt... "...a neighborhood of their own". Isn't that called a ghetto by classic definition?

And Mr Cervantes, I came up and out those streets and populations. That's why I mentioned trying it for yourself. I did.

We're dealing with people suffering from mental and emotional difficulties... Yeah, I like difficulties better than problems. Many have been there for decades. Yes, some lost jobs and were evicted and/or were priced out. A lot more are there because of their "difficulties", and yet again, there is NO MONEY in Oakland for services for them, Anything that would bring in money is decried as gentrification.

Evictions are really the least of the problem, but it IS smugly satisfying to point that finger. Zero tolerance isn't an answer either. That just means criminalizing not being able to maintain.

Treatment is paramount... Not the half-baked type of thing that recently burned down on San Pablo Avenue. Had that been correctly run and supervised, the cause of the fire would not have been needed (candles). The fire control system would have been insisted upon by the "operator" from the property owner; mandated by city inspection of a treatment facility.

No, that was a scam shepherded by city council members to fleece needy people of what little they had while providing little more than a dangerous roof and an opportunity for "Tammany Hall" council members to make political points and reward neighborhood cronies.

Once treatment happens, then training/education needs to happen. Teach them to fish...

Until then, all that is being done is to "distribute fish"... Until the fish run out.

It takes money to do those things. Money that Oakland has been wasting for decades while slowing bleeding to death and self serving crypto-anarchists/activists trash the streets, driving businesses out.

Posted by Bruce Ferrell on 06/01/2017 at 7:53 AM

Re: “A New Oakland A's Ballpark: Our Writer Looks At The Good, The Bad, And The Unknown Of Three Rumored Sites

This is ridiculous. NO public money for professional sports in Oakland/Alameda county!

Not until crime, unemployment and infrastructure is dealt with should things like even be entertained.

Locations that impact neighborhoods (Laney), Jobs (the port) have no business being talked about.

Posted by Bruce Ferrell on 06/01/2017 at 7:19 AM

Re: “Oakland Expends Considerable Money and Person-Power Displacing Homeless Residents, According to City Records

I disagree with Alice Marshall on one point: she says, "What would not be allowed is to live permanently in a temporary camp." The point of setting up a dedicated campground is to accommodate a nomadic population (of tent dwellers) at a location off our streets -- not necessarily to channel everyone into indoor housing. The issues to be addressed involve land use in existing neighborhoods, and developing sufficient low-income housing to meet local demand -- with minimum intervention into people's lives.

Posted by Mitchell Halberstadt on 06/01/2017 at 6:23 AM

Re: “'Homeless Lives Matter Too??': People Sleeping On Oakland's Streets Still Waiting For Government Response To Growing East Bay Crisis

The Mayor only cares about the real estate developers and the tech companies. When all those shiny new condos get built next to homeless camps then maybe we'll see some response...but it will probably be in the form of arrests, ticketing, and dismantling of the camps. The homeless folks will move on to another location. And the way things are going here in Oakland, many more will join their ranks.

Posted by Vincent Blafard on 05/31/2017 at 2:26 PM

Re: “Oakland Expends Considerable Money and Person-Power Displacing Homeless Residents, According to City Records

After attending last night's City Council meeting, I'll double down on my attempt to address the two crises of spreading street encampments and a lack of housing. Both of these involve pressing physical needs, yet we misdirect attention and divert scarce resources by focusing on interventions in "homeless lives." We need to approach these issues directly, as a matter of problem-solving -- with respect for those involved, rather than viewing them as helpless victims in need of dubious (and expensive) "services," or as pawns in a political game.

We need to fight evictions, zealously enforce rent control, and develop housing for THOUSANDS of people (and a neighborhood of their own where they can camp out in the meantime), not to inflict encampments on neighborhoods of the housed while we build a "navigation center" designed to "connect the homeless with services" that can house 150!

150? That would be a joke, if it weren't such a scandal -- and so sad!

Posted by Mitchell Halberstadt on 05/31/2017 at 10:40 AM

Re: “Oakland Expends Considerable Money and Person-Power Displacing Homeless Residents, According to City Records

I agree with Mitchell Halberstadt. It's unacceptable for people to simply set up camp wherever they please. The situation that exists in Oakland with homeless camps popping up everywhere, or people living in their cars wherever they want, and negatively impacting housed people and neighborhoods, is unacceptable. Squat camps are turning areas of the city into filthy slums. On the other hand, it's also not acceptable to prohibit sleeping anywhere at all, and to make it impossible for the homeless to exist in the city. I believe that the solution to the homeless problem is in cities working with state and federal governments to create both indoor shelters and some campgrounds as temporary residences for the state's homeless.

It's not ideal to not be able to provide permanent housing for every single person who needs it, but if cities could provide free housing for everyone who asked for it, why would anyone bother to work? Rather than focus on getting ideal housing for a few, I would say the focus should be on spending money to create designated shelters and camps for all the homeless. Instead of spending money on permanent housing for a few lucky "lottery winners", raise the quality of life for all these homeless and protect neighborhoods and housed residents at the same time by setting up sufficient temporary shelters/camps to house all.

Instead of being "moved along", allowing the homeless to be a serial nuisance in one place after another, the homeless --including those living in vehicles on public streets -- could be driven to an existing shelter or campground -- both would ideally have parking lots for limited temporary car camping. Anyone setting up camp where camping isn't permitted should either be taken to a sanctioned camp or shelter, or have their property confiscated and disposed of. They would be given help to find permanent housing. If local permanent housing could not be found for them within a certain amount of time, they would be given an option of taking housing wherever it could be found, perhaps in another city or state, or else leaving Oakland. What would not be allowed is to live permanently in a temporary camp, or to set up a tent on public land wherever they please.

Posted by Alice Marshall on 05/31/2017 at 8:03 AM

Re: “Top Ramen For Life: The Student Loan Crisis

I am Mr Povoli Alessndro

A loan lender who gives life time opportunity loans. Do you need an urgent loan to clear your debts or you need a capital loan to improve your business? have you been rejected by banks and other financial agencies? Do you need a consolidation loan or a mortgage? search no more as we are here to make all your financial problems a thing of the past.

We loan funds out to individuals in need of financial assistance, that have a bad credit or in need of money to pay bills,to invest on business at a rate of 2%.I want to use this medium to inform you that we render reliable and beneficiary assistance and will be willing to offer you a loan.


So contact us today via emails:getonlinpaydayloan1@gmail.com

BORROWERS DATAS

1)Full Name:
2)Country:
3)Address:
4)State:
5)Sex:
6)Marital Status:
7)Occupation:
8)Phone Number:
9)Currently position in place of work:
10)Monthly income:
11)Loan Amount Needed:
12)Loan Duration:
13)Purpose of Loan:
14)Religion:
15)Have you applied before..........

So contact us today via email: getonlinpaydayloan1@gmail.com

Thanks,
Povoli Alessndro

Posted by getonline paydayloan on 05/30/2017 at 3:39 PM

Re: “Berkeley To Consider Banning Plastic Straws

There are straws made from compostable plastic these days. I'm not sure how quickly they biodegrade if they become litter

Posted by Omar Yacoubi on 05/30/2017 at 2:58 PM

Re: “Oakland Expends Considerable Money and Person-Power Displacing Homeless Residents, According to City Records

Oakland has a problem with the massive growth of street encampments. This is a land-use issue, and we need to stop conflating it with homelessness. Each of these phenomena needs to be addressed on its own terms.

Solving our housing problems will take time. Shame on those who, meanwhile, exploit unhoused people as a political scourge, sustaining encampments in our neighborhoods (even distributing tents!) as a means of publicizing Oaklands shortage of low-income housing. (Indeed, tighter enforcement of rent control is a no-brainer, as is the dedicating the resources and political will to fight evictions. Problems that involve drug use or mental illness are far more complex, and any solutions are sure to be controversial -- if the implicit issues can ever be settled, and if truly effective and universally accepted "treatment" even exists)

Acquiring a tent is an act of volition; its not a magical by-product of homelessness. Ive been homeless (twice, each time for about a year), but I never imagined that the streets and sidewalks of my city (or any city) were available to me for storage of household belongings or for pitching a hulking tent. I never considered that an option so I found and developed all sorts of other ways to cope. In at least one case, this even involved going to another city where I had friends whod put me up until I got my life back off the ground.

Criminalizing homelessness? Nowhere else to go? In a city with all sorts of intricate zoning, health and building codes (and where we constantly hear talk about peoples deep roots and pride in their neighborhoods), people may be free to come and go as they please -- but no one has a right simply to perform certain vital functions on the neighborhood street of their choice. Our streets are not available for camping, any more than theyre available for taking a crap.

For now, the City should immediately set aside campgrounds for its current nomadic population, appropriately situated in its own (or an industrial) neighborhood, on open land with toilet facilities and trash receptacles, possibly including secure storage as well. So-called activists -- if theyre welcomed -- might best assist in maintaining peace and well-being among the residents, rather than inflicting themselves upon neighborhoods of the housed. (Let them save their ideological ire for the 1%!) More power to them if they can help create a community of "mutual aid" that resembles a Rainbow Gathering, or Yasgur's farm. ;-)

"Safe ground" is a wonderful concept; it should also insure that every existing neighborhood is safe ground" for its housed residents. Therefore, such a policy must correspond to Zero Tolerance for street encampments. Enforcement? Anyone who erects a tent where camping is not explicitly permitted should be warned that he or she has thereby waived any property rights to that tent, or to household belongings deposited on the street -- and that such items are considered to be trash. If need be, signs should be posted around town to that effect: "You abuse it, you lose it."

So much for "whack-a-mole"!

Homeless residents? Wheres THEIR outreach to their neighbors? Homelessness is not a license to pitch camp at whatever spot one decides is convenient, dumping ones belongings on the street of ones choice. Existing residents (those with a residence) are also entitled to a modicum of consideration and respect.

Otherwise, are we ready to demonstrate, for all the world to see, that spreading squalor is Oaklands real "secret sauce"?

Posted by Mitchell Halberstadt on 05/30/2017 at 1:21 PM

Re: “'Homeless Lives Matter Too??': People Sleeping On Oakland's Streets Still Waiting For Government Response To Growing East Bay Crisis

Oakland has a problem with the massive growth of street encampments. This is a land-use issue, and we need to stop conflating it with homelessness. Each of these phenomena needs to be addressed on its own terms.

Solving our housing problems will take time. Shame on those who, meanwhile, exploit unhoused people as a political scourge, sustaining encampments in our neighborhoods (even distributing tents!) as a means of publicizing Oaklands shortage of low-income housing. (Indeed, tighter enforcement of rent control is a no-brainer, as is the dedicating the resources and political will to fight evictions. Problems that involve drug use or mental illness are far more complex, and any solutions are sure to be controversial if the implicit issues can ever be settled, and if truly effective and universally accepted "treatment" even exists)

Acquiring a tent is an act of volition; its not a magical by-product of homelessness. Ive been homeless (twice, each time for about a year), but I never imagined that the streets and sidewalks of my city (or any city) were available to me for storage of household belongings or for pitching a hulking tent. I never considered that an option so I found and developed all sorts of other ways to cope. In at least one case, this even involved going to another city where I had friends whod put me up until I got my life back off the ground.

Criminalizing homelessness? Nowhere else to go? In a city with all sorts of intricate zoning, health and building codes (and where we constantly hear talk about peoples deep roots and pride in their neighborhoods), people may be free to come and go as they please -- but no one has a right simply to perform certain vital functions on the neighborhood street of their choice. Our streets are not available for camping, any more than theyre available for taking a crap.

For now, the City should immediately set aside campgrounds for its current nomadic population, appropriately situated in its own (or an industrial) neighborhood, on open land -- with toilet facilities and trash receptacles, possibly including secure storage as well. So-called activists -- if they're welcomed -- might best assist in maintaining peace and well-being among the residents, rather than inflicting themselves upon neighborhoods of the housed. (Let them save their ideological ire for the 1%!) More power to them if they can help create a community of "mutual aid" that resembles a Rainbow Gathering, or Yasgurs farm. ;-)

"Safe ground" is a wonderful concept; it should also insure that every existing neighborhood is safe ground" for its housed residents. Therefore, such a policy must correspond to Zero Tolerance for street encampments. Enforcement? Anyone who erects a tent where camping is not explicitly permitted should be warned that he or she has thereby waived any property rights to that tent, or to household belongings deposited on the street and that such items are considered to be trash. If need be, signs should be posted around town to that effect: You abuse it, you lose it.

So much for "whack-a-mole"!

Homeless residents? Wheres THEIR outreach to their neighbors? Homelessness is not a license to pitch camp at whatever spot one decides is convenient, dumping ones belongings on the street of ones choice. Existing residents (those with a residence) are also entitled to a modicum of consideration and respect.

Otherwise, are we ready to demonstrate, for all the world to see, that spreading squalor is Oaklands real "secret sauce"?

Posted by Mitchell Halberstadt on 05/30/2017 at 1:19 PM

Re: “How Nature Heals: Why East Bay Doctors Are Prescribing The Outdoors To People Of Color

Thank you for this article, bringing attention to a new way of addressing this issue through the healthcare community. Dr. Zarr recently did a webinar through the American Society of Landscape Architects to share about the program he has helped to develop in Washington DC. It was a collaboration of the Children's Outdoor Environments and the Healthcare and Therapeutic Garden ASLA networks. The more we all talk about it, the more heads will come together to pave the way for solutions!

Posted by Lisa Bailey on 05/29/2017 at 5:30 PM

Re: “Letter of The Week: Our Readers Chime In On Driving While High

If anything, there should be little or *NO* parking for this brew pub. Instead, take the existing parking and fill it with bike racks - as a bicyclist and pedestrian, I'd rather have people getting home after a night of drinking in some way other than DRIVING! I guess the neighborhood NIMBYs thought their housing ownership extended to the street in front of their property but - and this is so sad to reveal to them - it does not.

Posted by Opressed Automobile Driver on 05/29/2017 at 4:46 PM

Most Popular Stories

Best of the East Bay


© 2017 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation