Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: stories: Blogs

Re: “Grand Jury: Oakland’s ‘Backroom Dealing’ to Sell City-Owned Land Is Systemic Problem ‘Vulnerable to Undue Influence’

Can EBX please comment on why they have no "award winning investigative reporters" looking into the council members who seem to have been party to this?

Could it be that EBX and it's award winning reporters are nothing but sock puppets for these very council members; subverted by their political agenda(s) and beholden to them?

And why does this article read so very closely to the one on this topic by a certain media outlet from across the bay, while avoiding the specifics (from the grand jury report) in that article?

Citizens of Oakland want to know.

Posted by Bruce Ferrell on 06/20/2017 at 10:11 AM

Re: “Photos: Warriors Celebrate Second Title in Three Years with Parade and Rally in Oakland

Someone also need to check the budget. Very fishy and misuse of funds

Posted by concern _123 on 06/20/2017 at 8:31 AM

Re: “Photos: Warriors Celebrate Second Title in Three Years with Parade and Rally in Oakland

Someone need to check to see if city gets paid. You will be surprised. Then they will blame it on the person who is no longer with the cuty

Posted by concern _123 on 06/20/2017 at 8:03 AM

Re: “Grand Jury: Oakland’s ‘Backroom Dealing’ to Sell City-Owned Land Is Systemic Problem ‘Vulnerable to Undue Influence’

There should be a ballot to limit term of council members

Posted by concern _123 on 06/20/2017 at 8:01 AM

Re: “Grand Jury: Oakland’s ‘Backroom Dealing’ to Sell City-Owned Land Is Systemic Problem ‘Vulnerable to Undue Influence’

The problem is that the Public Ethics Commission has no hammer, other than public disclosure of misdeeds by public officials. There are no fines, no censures or any other punitive actions resulting from a continuous trend of back room deals. The politicians who do this know the law, they just don't care. They feel much like the orange idiot in Washington, "the rules don't apply to me". This pattern is not new and seems to only be getting worse despite recent battles with neighborhoods over disclosure and process. As shown in the E12th st debacle, even after the City Attorney advises the City Council of the law, they routinely ignore it and break the law anyway. There has to be consequences to these actions. Either personal, by way of fines or suspension. More importantly, the community should hold their feet to the fire by way of the ballot box.

Posted by Gary Patton on 06/20/2017 at 6:45 AM

Re: “The 'Green Rush' Went Next Level at Last Week's Cannabis Business Summit and Expo in Oakland

I want one of those machines for my bud!

Posted by Dave Mickinnon on 06/20/2017 at 6:24 AM

Re: “Grand Jury: Oakland’s ‘Backroom Dealing’ to Sell City-Owned Land Is Systemic Problem ‘Vulnerable to Undue Influence’

Residents always lose when the City gives away our public lands which would be far more valuable if used for low income housing, recreation facilities or green areas. These deals are usually short-sighted cash grabs which are extremely profitable for developers, often only providing housing for affluent people who want to move here, regularly displacing existing residents who council members are supposed to represent. And once the land is gone, it's gone for good.

Posted by Andy Gillis on 06/19/2017 at 4:28 PM

Re: “Grand Jury: Oakland’s ‘Backroom Dealing’ to Sell City-Owned Land Is Systemic Problem ‘Vulnerable to Undue Influence’

"The city has 90 days to respond to the Grand Jurys findings and recommendations."

Or what? 10 lashes with a wet noodle?

Posted by JP Massar on 06/19/2017 at 3:47 PM

Re: “Grand Jury: Oakland’s ‘Backroom Dealing’ to Sell City-Owned Land Is Systemic Problem ‘Vulnerable to Undue Influence’

In the past two years the city of Oakland has spent a great deal of time and money installing something called a Public Ethics Commission.

Designed according to its chief salesman, CM Dan Kalb, to improve confidence in city hall.

'Nuff said.

Posted by Hobart Johnson on 06/19/2017 at 2:49 PM

Re: “Crucial Legislation for New Oakland Police Commission Stalls in Committee as Activists and Councilmembers Fight Over Rules

If Council members believe that background checks are important, they should require checks of all candidates for elected office in Oakland.

The way it is now, the only "check" is the City Clerk checking that a candidate is registered to vote at their stated address. Candidates for City Attorney and Auditor must provide proof of current state license.

No official verification of resumes or candidate's statements.

Len Raphael, CPA
Temescal

Posted by Len Raphael on 06/17/2017 at 9:38 AM

Re: “Reports: Warriors Unanimously Reject Trump White House Visit After Winning Championship

Yeah Warriors!!! Good for you! Dump Trump!!!

Posted by Sage Feldemeyer on 06/15/2017 at 10:31 PM

Re: “Reports: Warriors Unanimously Reject Trump White House Visit After Winning Championship

Good for them. They are too good and too classy for the likes of incompetent, moron, Demagogue Don.

Posted by Sage Feldemeyer on 06/15/2017 at 10:30 PM

Re: “Crucial Legislation for New Oakland Police Commission Stalls in Committee as Activists and Councilmembers Fight Over Rules

Thanks Darwin for doing this article, as Measure LL/Police Commission issues haven't been covered much lately and how LL is implemented can change a lot, for better or worse. Better to have the Ordinance a little late than rushed thru with defects----and we are not that far apart....Was very disappointing to me that Council President Reid , for whatever reason, seemed to in an 'on strike/shut process down' mode, rather than being willing to hear from authors and public about the 5 to 6 areas of disagreement. The first Commissioner appointment process was launched in early June...with notice 2 applicants that general (not criminal) background checks will be done on all nominees.....time will tell if current or future SC is overruled on that.....

Posted by Mary Vail on 06/15/2017 at 9:10 PM

Re: “Crucial Legislation for New Oakland Police Commission Stalls in Committee as Activists and Councilmembers Fight Over Rules

One of the overwhelming problems of governance in Oakland is the failure to implement projects in a timely way. In addition there is all-too-often a failure to follow up to see whether projects are achieving their goals and then to modify them so that they do perform or perform better.

To put this all in perspective, the nitpicking on the methods for constituting the Police Commission is a class case in point.

Just possibly it would make sense to arrive quickly at a reasonable compromise so that at long last the Commission might (just might) go to work. If changes are needed, then changes can be made.

Another aspect of perspective: Oakland's police department is still in bad shape regarding critical aspects of performance and regarding morale; we haven't yet completed reforms mandated almost 15 years ago; crime remains far too high; the turnover rate for cops is far too high.

Posted by Hobart Johnson on 06/15/2017 at 4:04 PM

Re: “Reports: Warriors Unanimously Reject Trump White House Visit After Winning Championship

Petty and disrespectful to our duly elected President.

Posted by Brian Kennedy on 06/15/2017 at 3:34 PM

Re: “Photos from the ANSWER and Indivisible Counter-Protests Against ACT for America's 'March Against Sharia'

The Southern Poverty Law Center has been labeled a "hate group" by the National Rifle Association. Why is this publication citing a hate group like the SPLC?

Posted by Brian Kennedy on 06/15/2017 at 3:29 PM

Re: “Crucial Legislation for New Oakland Police Commission Stalls in Committee as Activists and Councilmembers Fight Over Rules

One of the provisions of the charter amendment and implementing ordinance requires that commissioners receive training in procedural justice, unconscious bias recognition and participation in the Civilian Police Academy. As someone who just completed the latter, I can say that all commissioners will undergo a full background check. This is the same check that is used in evaluating police academy candidates. The point is, that if an appointed commissioner has an undisclosed disqualifying criminal background, they can be removed for cause. My suggestion for a compromise is that the CPA training be initiated as soon as possible after appointment. This will allow the mayor and selection panel to evaluate the candidate on the face of their application, rather than the unconscious bias toward felons, regardless of the nature of the felony charge or conviction.

Posted by Michael Tigges on 06/15/2017 at 11:49 AM

Re: “Town Business: Oakland Discovers Extra $7.13 Million Hidden in Police Department's Proposed Budget

A public bank in Oakland? No thank you. The thieves in the city council will manage to find more money to spend on buying votes.

Posted by Ernest Montague on 06/15/2017 at 8:16 AM

Re: “Crucial Legislation for New Oakland Police Commission Stalls in Committee as Activists and Councilmembers Fight Over Rules

Having had the experience of working with ex cons, they run the gamut from John Spain ( intelligent, insightful, articulate) to absolute horrors of human beings who never should have been released. I do believe that there is a place for ex cons in the system, and also believe that discrimination is needed in their placement.

Posted by Ernest Montague on 06/15/2017 at 8:08 AM

Most Popular Stories

Best of the East Bay


© 2017 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation