Narrow Search

Comment Archives: stories: News & Opinion

Re: “Can Legal Weed Save the Music Industry?

JOIN THE ILLUMINATI FOR RICHES, FAME AND ALL-ROUND SUCCESS. JOIN TODAY AND HAVE ALL YOUR DESIRES IN LIFE. NO HUMAN SACRIFICE: THE OCCULT FESTIVAL IS HERE AGAIN!+2348108356068 Join the ILLUMINATI online today for Riches, Fame, Power and all round Success. Every new member(s) undeniable rewards of $450000 U.S dollars in addition toreceiveother material benefits after initiation. The purpose of the above financial reward is to help the new member fit the class and status of the club members. New member(s) also receive $75000 U.S dollars as monthly salary. Note that the higher you go in the society, the better your life becomes. Join us today and become rich, famous and successful. For more information, Contact us with the details displayed below. Contact us today as we prepare you for your initiation. Make good use of this great opportunity and have all your desires in life. Email: joinilluminatitemple626@gmail.comWhatsApp: +2348108356068 JOIN US TODAY & BECOME RICH POWERFUL,FAMOUS AND LIVE A GOOD LIFE.

Posted by Ben Maven on 10/15/2019 at 9:55 PM

Re: “Homeless Crackdown by Caltrans Sparks Dialogue in Berkeley

RE: " White Supremacists
Charge ever more Racist Rents
And are here blaming their victims. "

Um, no.

I am not white.

I do not own property in Oakland.

The property I do own, I live on, I do not rent.

I have never been a landlord.

Sorry "commonterry", your stereotyping missed the mark. (As stereotyping so often does.)

Posted by LT2012 on 10/13/2019 at 10:23 AM

Re: “Homeless Crackdown by Caltrans Sparks Dialogue in Berkeley

White Supremacists
Charge ever more Racist Rents
And are here blaming their victims.

Posted by commonterry on 10/12/2019 at 8:51 PM

Re: “Unmasking The Art of Living

Dear Lance hunter,
Reading blindfolded is a trick and has been debunked. Search YouTube for third eye debunked or "mid brain activation scam " by Dr Narendra Nayak

Posted by Sagar98641191 on 10/12/2019 at 11:21 AM

Re: “Hayward is Eyeing Unincorporated Cherryland for Annexation

Why does Hayward want to annex Cherryland? So they can get their hands on our property taxes without giving us any improvement in services.

Posted by Mongo on 10/11/2019 at 6:57 PM

Re: “Homeless Crackdown by Caltrans Sparks Dialogue in Berkeley

What ever happened to the concept of flying under the radar when you are living in tension with the law or public opinion? Squatting discretely. ;)

Homelessness is a huge problem-on that we all agree. Solutions, if ever, won't come this week.

But here is what can, because this can be done on an individual level at any time:


If the encampment occupants would dispose of trash with their spare time (it absolutely can be done), minimized the presence of their own waste (ditto-poop on newspaper over plastic....pee into containers/chamber pots etc---and dispose reasonably), didn't block public access to roads and sidewalks, and didn't use their domiciles to harass pedestrians or launch raiding operations from (how many stolen amazon boxes fit into a tent?).....the entire character of the problem would change, and I dare say there might be a lot more compassion shown by the general population.

As it is, I see little effort made at flying under the radar....rather, I see a lot of push back attitude and sense of entitlement that sponsors "I will do whatever I want!" as the M.O. of each day. The latter is anarchy, and that doesn't fly well at all with the average citizen.

From on high-how about laying down some ground rules and getting some R-E-S-P-E-C-T into the mix, (in both directions of course). Something like an extension of the old "will work for food!".

EX: "you" keep the place picked up, and off the sidewalks and streets---and "we" (the other side-community, city, state, ngo-s, whoever), hand out shots.....whatever the encampments can readily benefit from. A give and take win/win. Hire a couple locals to liaison with. Keep it simple, and keep it real.

Not a solution to the underlying problem, (those take decades and are needed in parallel). This just takes the edge off, to buy homeless campers some camping time and public patience while solutions are sought, (as they have to be). And it does so while engaging far more constructive dialog.


Everyone on both sides of this problem can do a lot more than they are to mitigate the negative effects of homelessness.

That said, though I am sympathetic and want to help the homeless (I volunteer my time to do so consistently), if they are going to act like combative irritants-I support them being treated as same. Incentivise decent behavior-do the reverse to the reverse. And do both consistently.

I am guessing 1/3-1/2 the affected population will respond reasonably....and that right there is significant progress in a problem going nowhere positive at present. Take that fraction-and build upon it incrementally.

The thousand mile journey begins with the first step. :)

Posted by LT2012 on 10/11/2019 at 2:00 PM

Re: “Unease at Eaze

RE: "Altogether, this saga could serve as an object lesson: when companies (or media outlets) operate in good faith and with as much transparency as possible, things tend to go much more smoothly, even during rough times."

It could so serve-but it does not. This is a media outlet-and this story does not read like "good faith" and/or "transparency" to me.

Rather, it reads like the author needed to make his column inch quota-and picked this non newsworthy item to do it with. (B-o-r-i-n-g)


Companies upsize and downsize all the time-it is the pulse of business on display. Cannabis is a new industry seeking to establish itself in the consumer marketplace. That it will go thru all sorts of dull fits and starts as that transpires, is hardly "newsworthy".....or interesting.

Honestly, I care that this author wanted to buy a vape pen and use a credit card to do it? Really? Well, I do not. Retail Cannabis is a cash business for a reason-and the industry itself is not the sponsor of that. (And no, I am in no way affiliated with any of it, just reading the local news here.)

How about cutting emerging businesses some slack as they work to become established.

How about leaving us readers with the sum of your consumer experience as successfully produced by Eaze? But nope-negative press is du jour and the article is a ding to Eaze's rep instead.

This piece makes Eaze ultimately sound nefarious, evasive, and well---broken!

No wonder people avoid the news and have developed such short attention spans....pieces like this are a solid waste of their time. And there are far too many of them.

Thank you Eaze for finally getting a vape pen into this article author's hand where it sounds as though it may be needed! :)

Posted by LT2012 on 10/11/2019 at 12:51 PM

Re: “Homeless Crackdown by Caltrans Sparks Dialogue in Berkeley

Ms. Stewart - Please come to Webster and 6th in Oakland and take a look at the encampment under the 880. Take note of how, over the course of two years, City of Oakland officials, and CalTrans, have allowed the encampment to slowly encroach over the entire sidewalk, in violation of state law. Now the encampment is encroaching into the public street. The first tent is so large that the residents built a platform out of pallets and it extends about two or three feet onto Webster. People in wheelchairs cannot get through, parking spaces are blocked, pedestrians put themselves at risk by having to walk in the street. Oakland Police responded to an incident here Sunday evening. One of many over the years. But officials won't enforce existing laws and won't find solutions.
The Salvation Army business across the street is complicit with affording the encampment residents with anything from furniture to clothing to exercise equipment, which ends up in the street. At one point over the summer there was a full size refrigerator in the street and an exercise bicycle in the encampment. A Homeless Gym.
On the other side of Webster as you enter the Posey Tube, is the encampment's landfill. No one but the encampment residents toss trash here.
Further down under the 880, between Webster and Franklin is an area under the Broadway exit ramp. Years ago CalTrans installed wrought iron fencing to keep people out. There is a gate that had a lock. The homeless cut off every lock Caltrans puts on it and then they set up their little community. Many of these people smoke methamphetamine and steal bicycles. One woman in particular has shown violent tendencies by swinging a 2x4 at passers by. She is also a hoarder so frequents the piles people illegally dump at the Salvation Army after hours. It's another trash pit, with rats, in this location. Mattresses included.
The 159 condo owners in my building next door get little to no response from Oakland officials anymore. Joe DeVries was very helpful and as responsive as he could be but this year even he has apparently given up or his hands are tied by the mayor's edicts.
Oakland, Berkeley, and Caltrans could do more to SOLVE these issues but they let red tape and rhetoric get in the way.
There is plenty of money and business partners to take action and make positive change. It's just a matter of elected officials knowing how to solve a problem and not just turn a blind eye, not kick the can down the road, or throw money at it.
Once you visit 6th Street, take a drive down 12th towards Fruitvale. Around 16th Ave you will see a long median with not just any encampment, but a tree house and RV encampment. There is a midsize motorhome on the median. Two years ago the City cleared it out and cut the lower tree branches, but there are treehouses once again. Very creative.

Posted by moriarty65 on 10/11/2019 at 6:44 AM

Re: “Homeless Crackdown by Caltrans Sparks Dialogue in Berkeley

The State through Caltrans has a responsibility to keep our freeways safe. The homeless issue may belong to the state but it seems to fall to the Cities to do the right thing. I just wonder if the Cities have tried to build a database of the homeless - where did they come from and do they have an ID belonging to another state. I suspect other states are still dumping on California. if so, send them back. I don't buy the number of homeless doubling - it is far worse than written here. On a final note doesn't Caltrans house all of the belongs they pick up in some repository? Maybe it is time to offer up Tilden Park to the homeless?

Posted by Art Zamora on 10/10/2019 at 6:02 PM

Re: “Homeless Crackdown by Caltrans Sparks Dialogue in Berkeley

We can never build enough below-market-rate housing, and I mean that literally. If I offered to sell you dollars for 50 cents, how many would you buy? All of them. As soon as we find free-ish housing for all of the people living on the streets, they will be replaced by just as many from elsewhere.

The solution to this is a must-shelter, no camping law. The state/county/city would be required to have a enough shelter beds for the population (as it is done on the east coast). Once that is achieved, no more camping on public land. Simple, humane and achievable.

Posted by Dave Potes on 10/10/2019 at 4:54 PM

Re: “Homeless Crackdown by Caltrans Sparks Dialogue in Berkeley

We indeed have a critical lack (and catastrophic loss) of low-income housing. That crisis needs to be addressed immediately, with utmost urgency.

We're faced with another crisis, however -- involving the abuse of public space -- and an entire "encampment" subculture rooted in that abuse (and an entire cottage industry hell-bent on legitimizing that subculture and using it as a scourge, to promote its own political fortunes).

We need to stop to conflating these two phenomena under the rubric of "homelessnesss."

I've been homeless myself. There's always another place to go (and -- housed or not -- another way to approach life).

We're told to have respect and compassion for our "unhoused neighbors," but where's their respect or consideration for the neighbors on whom they foist themselves? Even an addict can can avoid getting in peoples' faces, or tossing used syringes into playgrounds or onto the street.

If these people have such deep roots in the community, why won't any of their supposed neighbors put them up? The answers obvious. Respect and consideration are a two-way street.

No more "whack-a-mole." Time to move on, for the better and for good.

PS to Sam Spade: My father arrived in this country destitute in 1934, in the depths of the Depression. He would never even have considered living in an encampment. Neither would my mother, grandmother, sister aunt, or cousin.

Take a tip from one who's seen (and lived with) this predicament from both sides. Now, THAT's empathy!

Posted by Mitchell Halberstadt on 10/10/2019 at 4:48 PM

Re: “Homeless Crackdown by Caltrans Sparks Dialogue in Berkeley

Letter writing campaign to the City of Berkeley to get some actions done?

Posted by Lina Campopiano on 10/10/2019 at 9:23 AM

Re: “Hayward is Eyeing Unincorporated Cherryland for Annexation

I hope the people of Cherryland think long and hard about this. As a resident I definitely don't like the idea nor would I approve that plan. I think our neighborhood is just fine and we don't need to be part of a city that is not fiscally conservative about doing what's best for their residents.

Posted by Linda Salcido on 10/10/2019 at 8:03 AM

Re: “Hayward is Eyeing Unincorporated Cherryland for Annexation

What is in it for Cherryland? The only room for development would be to tear down the nearly 100 year old homes that fill the area. They did this before to Cherryland to build Sunset High School, 187 homes and businesses plowed under for a school that was needed for only 25 years. Is Cherryland targeted again?

Posted by Rick Kelly on 10/10/2019 at 12:20 AM

Re: “Homeless Crackdown by Caltrans Sparks Dialogue in Berkeley

Why do those in positions of "power" continue doing the same things over and over, while expecting different results?

The answer is a lack of tax dollars to do it... The area has LOT's of people "doing their own thing"... But they pay nothing to support the infrastructure they use.

When I was a kid, I had a MUCH younger sibling who looked at my parents when there was something they wanted and told them to just "write" some (write a check). The very young tend to do things this way.

As to the presented example? Well, THERE are programs for seniors that would house her. I bet there are rules she doesn't want to comply with. I come out of the streets. It's what I've seen with my own two eyes.

Posted by Bruce Ferrell on 10/09/2019 at 9:59 PM

Re: “Point Reyes Ranchers Create Lobbying Group to Weaken Protections for Public Lands

Michael Cosley, you're right---there never was any such promise.

The individual ranchers who sold the land were given 25-year leases so they could continue ranching for their own individual lifetimes. Those leases expired in 1987. There was NO explicit or implicit promise that ranching could continue indefinitely.

The excess manure from the over 5000 cows is too much to be composted, and it contaminates the ground water and the seashore. Shameful for this pollution to exist within a national park.

Posted by Jon Spear 1 on 10/09/2019 at 9:33 PM

Re: “Homeless Crackdown by Caltrans Sparks Dialogue in Berkeley

"They're not going to build a bunch of low income housing tomorrow," advocate Henson said. "They need to deal with this today."
This has been stated over the last FIVE YEARS and yet the problems and abuse continues. Why do those in positions of "power" continue doing the same things over and over, while expecting different results?
Is this not the definition of INSANITY?

Posted by Barbara Brust 1 on 10/09/2019 at 7:32 PM

Re: “The New Face of Homelessness: Elderly and Disabled

To force them to vacate and not do a thing with the property, while winter comes and the pair fester in an RV, it isn't right.

Posted by Wendy Huntington Parker Fages on 10/09/2019 at 2:25 AM

Re: “Homeless Crackdown by Caltrans Sparks Dialogue in Berkeley

Look at the photo. Imagine if this were your mother, grandmother, sister aunt, cousin, etc.
Would you think its ok for them yo be treated this way. To be totally ignored except to punish them for being poor

Posted by Sam Spade on 10/08/2019 at 6:17 PM

Re: “The New Face of Homelessness: Elderly and Disabled

How is it possible that the brother-in-law has not been formally charged with financial exploitation and neglect of vulnerable disabled adults?

Posted by Dr. Teri on 10/08/2019 at 2:02 PM

Most Popular Stories

© 2019 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation