Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: stories: News & Opinion: Opinion

Re: “Making Oakland a Real Sanctuary City

so nieve

Posted by Mike Mitchell on 07/03/2017 at 9:46 AM

Re: “Making Oakland a Real Sanctuary City

Will this sanctuary protect Native Oaklanders from the horrific violation of our human rights by the city government of Oakland? We really need some help to escape these Jim Crow policies and abuse of our Constitutional rights. How dare they try to capitalize on this failure of a National Policy to portray themselves as saviors. They cannot be the savior when they are the same people removing human rights from innocent residents under their care and the entire collection of these same politicians are currently under federal scrutiny http://www.karmawon.wordpress.com I am offended by this publicity stunt and hypocrisy they are pulling in this vote. Free Oaklanders from Oakland City Government Fascism!

Posted by Heather Smith on 06/30/2017 at 7:25 PM

Re: “Making Oakland a Real Sanctuary City

Right on, Rebecca Kaplan and Brian Hofer! Thank you.

Posted by Margaret Cunningham on 06/30/2017 at 6:33 PM

Re: “A New Plan For Oakland’s Planning Commission

The Planning Commission is definitely weighted toward developer interests, a reflection of Mayor Schaaf's open door policy for developers. But to think of Ms. Myres as being a community defender. I witnessed her on occasions to side strongly with developers despite strong neighborhood oppositions. Her support toward developers was even contrary to City policy as laid out in zoning policy. I also found that her "design" comments were shallow and showed a basic lacking in understanding of the principals of Urban Design. Its depressing to think that Ms. Myres is the best Oakland's got.

Posted by Charlie Chan on 05/15/2017 at 9:26 AM

Re: “A New Plan For Oakland’s Planning Commission

"We want an Oakland for all. Currently, planning commissioners are appointed by the mayor and confirmed by City Council, our elected representatives.

"Too often, these nomination decisions are made behind closed doors and benefit both their personal friends and political donors."

Well put. Oakland needs to elect a Mayor and Council Members who serve the ordinary people of Oakland, all of them, not just the wealthy and priviledged, out-of-towners and transplants. Those folks can take care of
themselves, and do.

Posted by Hobart Johnson on 05/11/2017 at 9:51 AM

Re: “Contra Costa County Should Unite Behind Marin Clean Energy

As a Berkeley resident, I look forward to when East Bay Community Energy starts offering Alameda County dwellers affordable renewable energy. Serving Alameda County is a big project: it seems that EBCE would do best to focus on getting up and running, rather than competing for customers in other counties.

Posted by Miriam Walter on 05/01/2017 at 1:47 PM

Re: “Contra Costa County Should Unite Behind Marin Clean Energy

I would hope that the Contra Costa County Supervisors make the fiscally prudent and logical local governmental choice by joining with fellow Contra Costa County cities who already selected MCE as the clean energy agency to represent them. Why not go with an agency with a demonstrated track record of success?

Posted by Marcy Kates on 05/01/2017 at 1:25 PM

Re: “Contra Costa County Should Unite Behind Marin Clean Energy

I lived in Marin where MCE started. The organization proved us with clean energy then and now that I live in Walnut Creek, I'm extremely happy that MCE's the great services are continuing here

Please consider MCE,it will be one of the best decisions the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors could make

Marcia McLean

Posted by Marcia McLean on 05/01/2017 at 12:28 PM

Re: “Contra Costa County Should Unite Behind Marin Clean Energy

I'm a resident of unincorporated Contra Costa County - I live 100ft. away from the City of Richmond, but solar is unaffordable on my roof because of the miserable incentives from PG&E. I want my community to have access to locally produced clean energy - it doesn't make sense to wait and wait and wait when we have a proven system working now. Let's join Richmond and get to work.

Posted by Matt 1 on 05/01/2017 at 10:05 AM

Re: “Pardoned 'Crack King' Darryl Reed Says He Wants To Unite Oakland Neighborhoods

It's always amazing how these characters pop up, ex criminals ( we hope) now hoping for government and private grants to do the "good work".

Posted by Ernest Montague on 04/14/2017 at 1:33 PM
Posted by Vai Smile on 04/07/2017 at 12:11 PM

Re: “Pardoned 'Crack King' Darryl Reed Says He Wants To Unite Oakland Neighborhoods

Why not 26 year's ? Time served or he could a year in the Fed's and got a show with snoop dogg ? Can't blame the youth of we don't see the truth

Posted by Vai Smile on 04/07/2017 at 12:10 PM

Re: “Pardoned 'Crack King' Darryl Reed Says He Wants To Unite Oakland Neighborhoods

I can complain, because, while I was selling records on consignment and out of the trunk of my car, I'm told that Short was getting $200k from dubious sources to buy Black radio and Hammer got $170k from the A's and also dubious sources. I am not "hatin'". I am glad my brothas were successful. But, Quan is a $144 million-dollar criminal, who will never even be investigated...I don't know...If $3 million-dollar criminal, Reed, who did 26 years of prison time, was White or Asian, everyone would be saying how he had paid his debt to society and that everyone deserves a second chance...Quan was elected Mayor!! And, what crime did Too Short commit? Why besmear his name? Guilt by association? Yes...Everyone says that about Blacks in America...Wanna convict him for his lyrics? You got my vote! But, otherwise, he is NOT a criminal...The crime is at Youth Uprising, which has accepted millions in federal funds for a phony after school program and can rarely get more than 3 people in through the doors in a week...Is Pastor Stanley Burell (MC Hammer) a criminal, too? And, what about Martha Stewart? How many lives did she ruin, while enriching herself? How many people are rushing up to her to get autographs and to do shows with her? You criticizing them, too? What about Delorean? $24 million in cocaine in ONE DEAL and never saw ONE day of jail-time. They never even searched his house. He still briefly sold his nasty-looking cars. All of these crimes took place within a few years of each other. Reed is the only one who did serious time...What product is Reed selling, now? Peace and Acceptance? I guess we had better lock him up again for that? Further, tons of cocaine are still being allowed into this country by the government. You gonna stop hanging out with them? Bet you run and vote every time they run for something...Due to counter-intelligence and social service from Brothas like me, after the Million Man March, we were able to get the majority of our people off of crack cocaine...while Delorean was still throwing million-dollar cocktail parties... So, get off of us, Charlie Pine. You've got some work to do in Asian and White America, and the crimes appear to be a lot worse.

Posted by Terence Candell on 04/05/2017 at 8:15 AM

Re: “Pardoned 'Crack King' Darryl Reed Says He Wants To Unite Oakland Neighborhoods

As a formerly incarcerated Woman from the Bay Area I am obligated to give back. I would like to organize a Bay Area Regional Talent Showcase and have competition in Academics, Sports, the Arts. From fashion to culinary. Pull this off and we might stand a chance in rebuilding our Youth!

Posted by Shelly Hughes on 04/03/2017 at 11:55 AM

Re: “Pardoned 'Crack King' Darryl Reed Says He Wants To Unite Oakland Neighborhoods

As a "Returning Citizen" aka Formerly Incarcerated man from Oakland, & personal friend of Darryl Reed, Too Short, & sever others in attendance at what I considereda monumental event, because I know that Darryl feels that his actions of the 80's led to what's happening with the younger generations, & the violence not just in the Bay Area, but throughout the country is a result of all of our actions when we were their age. Darryl & several other Returning Citizens choose to find what are the best practices & models that will reduce this youth violence. I have chosen to find additional resources for those that are Formerly Incarcerated & who still are that want to continue on with their education. Or from incarceration to institutions of higher education. In essence, those of us who have made mistakes, & have paid our debts to society want to contribute back to society in a positive way.

Respectively Yours,
LaMont "Monty" Jackson

Posted by MacMonty on 04/01/2017 at 7:12 PM

Re: “Pardoned 'Crack King' Darryl Reed Says He Wants To Unite Oakland Neighborhoods

"Too Short" welcomes this man who ruined countless lives. TS, you recall, was appointed a career counselor by the Youth UpRising agency (where Jean Quan kicked off her mayoral campaign).

Posted by Charlie Pine on 03/31/2017 at 8:48 PM

Re: “AB InBev’s Corporate Craft Brand Isn’t Coming to Oakland To Make Beer Buddies. It’s Coming To Dominate.

Most beer drinkers in the Bay Area will support a locally owned shop rather than some nasty corporate conglomerate. Of course the ex-frat and sorority newcomer/carperbaggers will flock to it like they flock to Chipotle over real Mexican food. They can have it. This just means less obnoxious behavior in beer pubs for the rest of us. Feel sorry for the neighbors. As we know the City of Oakland doesn't give a sh*t about people who live here, only about $$$ for their political campaigns and their real estate cronies like slumlord scumbag Keith Kim.

Posted by Vincent Blafard on 03/30/2017 at 3:52 PM

Re: “AB InBev’s Corporate Craft Brand Isn’t Coming to Oakland To Make Beer Buddies. It’s Coming To Dominate.

Good work Nick. ABInBev's history of despicable business practices is remarkable. There Southern CA distributors were fined just last month for pay-to-play draft beer placements.

Posted by Sayre Piotrkowski on 03/30/2017 at 11:06 AM

Re: “AB InBev’s Corporate Craft Brand Isn’t Coming to Oakland To Make Beer Buddies. It’s Coming To Dominate.

The design of this proposal does not fit into the feel and the look of this neighborhood.
Shipping containers should not be allowed to house a business of this size,
especially a brewery and a restaurant.
The proposal looks cheap and industrial, not a good fit in our area.
There will be a big impact in our neighborhood because of the noise
that a brewery of this size will bring. There will be noise from operating the
brewery and the restaurant, from constant day & night deliveries, noise from the need to
clean the facility, inside and out. Customers will no doubt cause late
night noise to the surrounding residences, as the present restaurants/bars
in the area already do. Parking for residents will be severely impacted, we have
been terribly impacted with the restaurants already here.We recently had an armed car high jacking,
we believe caused because the driver could not find parking!
There will be noise from the added trash and recycling pick-up that this business. will cause. This establishment will cause there to be an awful smell in the area from the beer brewing process. Outdoor alcohol will be available and Tech HS
is just 2 blocks away, as are 2 other schools, and
Thunder Road, the drug re-hab
residence is DOWN THE BLOCK from this proposed business.
Does this make sense? Does it?
NO!
We do not need more alcohol served
in our small area here on/near 40th Street/Manila Ave. There are several businesses
in the area already serving alcohol and food. The noise, litter problems,
& parking problems from these business is bad enough! Our quality of life
in this area is being further degraded due to these concerns.
Planners should not permit this type of business in this spot in the Temescal.
Enough is enough. Friends, write to Rebecca Lind at rlind@oaklandnet.com. before 4:00 pm on Monday, April 3.
referring case #PLN17004 and tell her YOUR concerns for such an awful business made of shipping containers in our neighborhood.
Ellen Gierson, Oakland
a close neighbor of this disastrous project

Posted by Ellen Gierson on 03/29/2017 at 11:02 PM

Re: “AB InBev’s Corporate Craft Brand Isn’t Coming to Oakland To Make Beer Buddies. It’s Coming To Dominate.

For those interesting in commenting on this application, write to Zoning Case Planner Rebecca Lind at rlind@oaklandnet.com before 4:00 pm on Monday, April 3.

Please note that the intrusion of national corporate interests into competition with truly locally owned microbreweries, while a legitimate concern, is an issue that the zoning codes do *not* address and staff cannot take into consideration in their decision making. Other cities (i.e., San Francisco) have some controls on chain businesses, but while several neighborhoods have been raising this issue since the 1980s, there has to date not been action from Oakland's city council on this issue.

Concerned neighbors need to talk about the design (Ick! Cheezy use of shipping containers, and the most garish colors of the '80s in the proposed paint job!), and neighborhood impacts: noise from customers; noise from operations, including end of the day cleanup of outside areas (blowers or other mechanical means?); hours of operations; traffic; parking (peak staff is projected to be 32! They are not saying how many customers can fit in!); time and frequency of garbage pickup (what kind of garbage is generated by 1) the restaurant function and 2) the brewing? I have no familiarity with the brewing process. Are there spent hops like grape skins from winemaking? What volume? Do they smell?); frequency and hours for recycling pick up; alcohol control where there is such a short fence, outdoor alcohol, and a major bus transfer point in front for Oakland Tech High School students; litter control for the block; where deliveries will be made and what hours; how they will keep people from dropping off/picking up customers in the bus stop; and any other impacts you can think of.

These concerns can all be addressed in Conditions of Approval for the project. As to the chain business issue? Tell your councilmember you want controls in the zoning codes.

Posted by Valerie Winemiller on 03/29/2017 at 1:09 PM

Most Popular Stories


© 2017 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation