Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: Stories: Blogs

Re: “City of Alameda Allows Pot Businesses on Island

It was historic, very meaningful for patient advocates and wellness here on our sanctuary island.

Posted by Juliet Lockwood on 07/11/2017 at 9:36 AM

Re: “City of Alameda Allows Pot Businesses on Island

I was there, this is history in the making for Alameda more than you know!

Kevin Storm
Cannabis Achievers of the World!

Posted by Kevin Storm on 07/10/2017 at 11:50 PM

Re: “Oakland Has a New Two-Year Budget, but Only After a Night of Divisive Infighting

And people wonder why Oakland is so dysfunctional.

Yes, let's cut first responder services and give into the mob rule mentality.

Dan's proposal is ridiculous.

Posted by Robert Hope on 07/10/2017 at 8:07 PM

Re: “Arson in Oakland: Is Someone Torching New Developments?

Suddenly concerned about the new condo construction across the street. Will it be torched and will my buildings and neighboring buildings be evacuated or even catch fire? This is not the way to stop gentrification, higher rents, and displacement.

Posted by Margaret Cunningham on 07/10/2017 at 6:59 PM

Re: “City of Alameda Allows Pot Businesses on Island

Thank you for this article and the subsequent coverage.

I was one of the first speakers
To address the council that night and spoke about employment, traffic, and commuting issues as related to Cannabis positively affecting Alameda.

I believe we met that night my name is Rich Moskowitz.

There are currently two groups established inAlameda . AICC ( alameda island cannabis community) a joint business and citizen group, and ASCA ( Alameda Safe Cannabis Access), and soon to be a third dedicated just to neighbors educating neighbors about the benefits of cannabis for our community.

Feel free to reach out to me if you'd like background on the groups, issues, players, etc.

Regards
Rich Moskowitz
Thelanaiclub@gmail.com

Posted by ThelanaiClub on 07/10/2017 at 5:22 PM

Re: “Arson in Oakland: Is Someone Torching New Developments?

This is what real class warfare looks like. People are not just gonna sit around and do nothing as all options are taken from them. Whats real is this isn't a crime committed by some homeless drug addicted street person. The people behind these acts are willing to take the stand against the contiuning exploition of the Bay area by Realtors and Developers who's main concern is always profit over people,to the next level. James Baldwin said it best."THE FIRE NEXT TIME" is now.

Posted by Fulani carter on 07/10/2017 at 12:12 PM

Re: “Arson in Oakland: Is Someone Torching New Developments?

This shocking news of another building fire at a large housing development in the east bay should be a wake up call for everyone to the need for more not less new construction.

It is irrational to think that if we stop building new housing it will somehow keep people from moving to Oakland and gentrifying the city. Yes Oakland is a desirable place to live and is close to Silicon Valley and San Francisco where many of the jobs in the new economy are being created. If new housing is unavailable then older housing stock will be sold or rented to those who can pay the market price and even more will be displaced from the city.
It now appears that the housing crisis will spiral even more out of control as developers decide it is not worth the risk of building here. People should support new development for all income levels and not scare it away!
Developers also need to consider more security at their building sites and fire sprinkler systems should be installed as soon as practical at an earlier stage of construction to deter or prevent those who would consider arson as a city planning tool

Posted by Nick Yale on 07/09/2017 at 3:15 AM

Re: “Arson in Oakland: Is Someone Torching New Developments?

What is almost worse then this huge fire at a new housing development in downtown Oakland is the reaction many people seem to have. "People feel like they are being priced out of living in Oakland" is somehow given as justification to burn down a building you think you couldn't afford to live in.
Doesn't anyone think about 20-30 years in the future when the same building might have become a senior or other affordable housing when presumably newer buildings come on line for higher income people to live in? And what kind of a city would we have now if people had burned down anything they couldn't have afforded? People please get a grip!

Posted by Nick Yale on 07/09/2017 at 3:11 AM

Re: “Arson in Oakland: Is Someone Torching New Developments?

the Emeryville fire was 105 housing units.

I think the standard figure is 3 people per unit. Using that, it seems this latest fire took out about 230 units in one way or another (700 displaced is the reported figure)... So we're looking at over 300 hundred units NOT housing people... Putting MORE pressure on housing at all levels, especially the low end.

Add to that the 400 units, last I heard, blocked by activists in the MacArthur BART vicinity... That would likely have reduced vehicle emissions as well as providing housing.

Just gotta love this town.

Posted by Bruce Ferrell on 07/08/2017 at 3:04 PM

Re: “Arson in Oakland: Is Someone Torching New Developments?

Thank you for reporting on this article. It doesn't take a meteorologist to tell you that it sunny and hot outside when it's sunny and hot. The amount of fires on under construction multifamily, mixed use buildings in Oakland (including the one in Emeryville literally across the street from Oakland) is much higher than everywhere else. Local officials can't just come out and say it was arson for political reasons, but it's obvious to everyone that it is arson, because the odds are so small there would be so many fires in Oakland on the same type of projects, in the same type of areas in such a short amount of time. There are some serious issues going on in Oakland that are preventing the city from further urbanization.

Pains me to see this happen. Looked like a nice, well conceived and designed mixed use complex that would have likely stood for over 100 years and provided housing for literally thousands of people over that time-span. No one was getting displaced by this project because it was built over what had been a surface parking lot. I wonder what the broader intentions of the arsonist were. If it was to stop gentrification, this will only make it worse, but perhaps he intends to accelerate it. Either way he/she has been able to cause great carnage with impunity, which is depressing. No one should be able to get away with that.

One other angle no one has brought up is the environmental impact of such fires. Tons of timber and construction materials destroyed, tons of carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere as well as particulate matter and chemicals. We all have to breath this stuff, especially those in close proximity. These kind of fires are environmental disasters.

Posted by Julian Urmson on 07/08/2017 at 11:10 AM

Re: “Arson in Oakland: Is Someone Torching New Developments?

Kellersan, here is a link regarding the two Emeryville fires, both arson: http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2017/06/08/atf-investigators-say-destructive-emeryville-fire-was-arson/

Posted by mizjanedough on 07/08/2017 at 9:22 AM

Re: “Nextdoor Lead Silences Police Complaints

Cinco de mayo is an American created holiday celebrated by Americans. It's not celebrated in Mexico. Every holiday has drunk driving and dui checkpoints. Only idiots take offense to that.

Posted by other on 07/08/2017 at 3:08 AM

Re: “Report: Profound Racial Disparities in Mortgage Lending Seen in Oakland

Hi people , I am Larissa April,Last year, i had health issue and due to this reason i was advised by my doctor to always move on a vehicle in order to avoid the total loose of strength since my place of work was far from where i and my husband reside , i told my husband about my plans to get a loan since there was no other means so that i can get a good car of my choice but my husband instructed and advise that i shouldn't apply for a loan online because almost all loan lenders online are fake and fraudulent in there actions so i had to suffer the stress of not moving on a car for some months and i later made up my mind to apply for an online loan because i wasn't having any other choice at that point but still i was advised by my siblings to apply for a bank loan instead of an online loan especially due to the current ongoing news about online scammers but all effort to get a loan from my bank didn't work through because i was having a bad credit report so with all this issues i had to get my mind crossed by applying for a loan online although i wont say that i was so perfect or very careful for not been scammed but i strongly believe that it was the lords mercy of God that directed me to the AMEIR MILLER CLASSIC FINANCIAL INSTITUTE . the great news is that i got my loan funds very fast and easily and this came to the surprise of my husband and my siblings who had earlier on discouraged me on this online loan issue and the most surprising of all was that i was granted this loan funds at a very cheap interest rate if %2.5 percent ... i am grateful for this car loan and i am also grateful to the AMEIR MILLER LOAN FOUNDATION FOR THERE transparency and total support , you can reach them on email : ameirmillerclassicloaninstitute@yahoo.com or theameirmillerloanorganisation@gmail.com , text +1 252-585-5014 ameirmillerapprovedloans@usa.com ,ameirmillerfinancialinstitute@gmail.com

Posted by Larissa Singh on 07/08/2017 at 2:10 AM

Re: “Arson in Oakland: Is Someone Torching New Developments?

The ATF only makes statements for ongoing investigations. They don't have a web site where they make announcements any more than the FBI makes statements. It's also been reported on sfgate.

IS an announcement of a declaration of arson in dispute? Calling it "fake news"?

Just my opinion, but I think it's fairly obvious the "by any means necessary" element is at work.

Posted by Bruce Ferrell on 07/07/2017 at 5:32 PM

Re: “Arson in Oakland: Is Someone Torching New Developments?

Still need a source on that. I mean, a link to the source, or name of the document...something that can be verified. I'm unable to find this information online.

Posted by KellerSan on 07/07/2017 at 5:01 PM

Re: “Trial Begins for East Bay Landlord Accused of Rigging Foreclosure Auctions

I'm looking for follow up on Marr's conviction. Only news I read was LA Times. Would like to see locally.

Posted by Christine Miller on 07/07/2017 at 2:02 PM

Re: “Arson in Oakland: Is Someone Torching New Developments?

Victoria, source is federal ATF. They detemined at least 3 of these fires were arson.

Posted by Darwin BondGraham on 07/07/2017 at 11:38 AM

Re: “Arson in Oakland: Is Someone Torching New Developments?

"There have been a string of fires since 2012 set purposefully to destroy new development in downtown and West Oakland."

Source?

Posted by Victoria Fierce on 07/07/2017 at 11:13 AM

Re: “California Took a Big Step Closer to Regulating the Cannabis Industry

Also CDFA recently organized the inaugural meeting of the new CA Industrial Hemp Advisory Board, which is a big step in the right direction

Posted by Alex Brant-Zawadzki on 07/06/2017 at 8:47 PM

Re: “Dating Got You Down? Oakland Punk Band Spray Tan's "Soloslut" Is Your New Self-Love Anthem

Some acquire a encompassing membership mean of diverse users looking for galore diametric types of relationships chatrooms

Posted by Jason Statham on 07/03/2017 at 3:52 PM

Most Popular Stories


© 2017 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation