Narrow Search

Comment Archives: Stories: News & Opinion

Re: “Why the Oakland A’s Should Rethink the Laney College Site

I highly disagree. This would create so many new jobs for the neighborhood, business for existing businesses, generate tax dollars for the city, plus jobs jobs jobs. There are building the park with zero tax dollars and now the concern is people will get displaced? The reason people are getting displaced in this city is because of people who keep protesting against building more housing. You can't have it both ways.

Posted by Jay78 on 09/07/2017 at 10:09 AM

Re: “A Cautionary Tale

The boxing gym has moved to another location! Davis St provides medical care, dental care, a food bank, and has weekly marketplace for people to get goods and household items. These are all things that benefit the entire community and especially low income families. They prevent the poor people of our community from sliding toward homelessness and are doing excellent work.

Posted by Sally Anderson on 09/07/2017 at 9:29 AM

Re: “Why the Oakland A’s Should Rethink the Laney College Site

What is wrong with the current site? Next to the BART station. Convenient. Moving it next to Laney College will increase traffic and the surrounding SMALL streets can't accommodate it. Not to mention the displacement of hundreds, if not a couple thousand, current residents. STUPID STUPID STUPID.

Posted by Vincent Blafard on 09/07/2017 at 9:14 AM

Re: “Why the Oakland A’s Should Rethink the Laney College Site

It's far more important to build a Laney stadium, get rid of all those pesky low income people, and ensure and endless supply of free tickets to the games for the City Council and Mayor. Where are your priorities, people? Too bad about the wetlands, but that's life.

Posted by Ernest Montague on 09/07/2017 at 9:02 AM

Re: “Warriors Have Yet to Repay Oakland for Parades

A few days after the 2015 rally, the measure DD committee began enquiring about the massive damage to new plantings that were paid for with DD bond monies. As far as I can tell the Warriors managers must be a bunch of cynical cheapskates. I mean, not replacing daylilies? That's just silly!

Posted by Naomi_Schiff on 09/06/2017 at 10:32 PM

Re: “Why the Oakland A’s Should Rethink the Laney College Site

It's clear the decision will have a negative impact on Laney College, and its already marginalized, and increasingly displaced students' and the cultural life of the city. I can imagine a city with both, but not at the same spot. #LeaveLaneyAlone
#OaklandAsLeaveLaneyAlone

Posted by CStroffolino on 09/06/2017 at 10:10 PM

Re: “Why the Oakland A’s Should Rethink the Laney College Site

Yes I do and totally disagree. That attitude is condemning entrepreneurs to being bottom of the barrel. Why not try something that will really help these people achieve higher like lobbying for investment by the As and the city in existing local businesses for improvements to rise the tide for everyone. Pushing to keep low income people as low income people is a losing strategy. Be a fighter to raise the tide for everyone.

Posted by Nutella PR on 09/06/2017 at 6:41 PM

Re: “Why the Oakland A’s Should Rethink the Laney College Site

Nutella PR, do you have any idea what businesses currently exist in that area? Most of the existing businesses are low-margin and serve minority (Southeast Asian) communities. They are not in a position to capitalize on the changes a ballpark would bring to the neighborhood, but landlords can and will capitalize on those changes. The result will be displacement of the people who live here now and the businesses that serve them. Yes, there will be winners to offset the losers. Here's how it will go down, by and large: The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. You see no problem with this?

And Paula Martin, NO to eminent domain anywhere in Oakland. Period. "Most of what's there can easily be relocated" is a horribly entitled attitude. If the people whose property and businesses are in that area really feel they can "easily be relocated," then whoever can make better use of their land should easily be able to buy it from them. If they don't feel that way, no one has a legitimate right to displace them.

Posted by Esteban Camilo on 09/06/2017 at 6:25 PM

Re: “Loopholes in ADA Law Make "No Pets" Clauses Nearly Impossible to Enforce

I am Judy Parker single Mother from Houston here in Texas when I was in need of a loan I apply through my bank but was deny cos of my credit score then someone refer me on this site to Ramsy Dave Loan Company and I apply for a loan with them and was approved without credit check and low interest rate of 3% and there was no cosigner, You can reach them with this email if you need a loan I am sure they can still help you ramsedave121@gmail.com

Judy Parker

Posted by Judy Parker on 09/06/2017 at 4:46 PM

Re: “A Cautionary Tale

This article intentionally misses key facts such as the fact that Davis St received an $800K grant very shortly after making payment on the loan to the City of SL; does Rose Johnson not understand what the consequences are for not paying a loan? Why such drama? She is clearly over extended and not doing our community any services but attracting and keeping the wrong kind of people in town.

Posted by Ricardo Trigueros on 09/06/2017 at 4:32 PM

Re: “A Cautionary Tale

So it's okay for kids to sustain permanent brain damage boxing, but the "risk" of a medical cannabis dispensary less than 1000 feet away is unacceptable?!

Posted by Miles Monroe on 09/06/2017 at 4:11 PM

Re: “Why the Oakland A’s Should Rethink the Laney College Site

WHY DON'T THEY PUT IT DOWNTOWN. Jesus. Or in Jack London Square?

Posted by Jono Schneider on 09/06/2017 at 3:36 PM

Re: “Why the Oakland A’s Should Rethink the Laney College Site

This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. What kind of business owner would not want a 10x-100x increase in foot traffic and money to spend on their business. Instead of always seeing change as negative, for once I'd like to see entrepreneurs and communities ask "How can we benefit and win from this?" instead of taking a damn defeatist approach from the beginning.

Posted by Nutella PR on 09/06/2017 at 11:19 AM

Re: “Why the Oakland A’s Should Rethink the Laney College Site

Impacts on the nearby channel from Lake Merritt to the estuary must be considered. The Peralta area is part of the lifeline for Lake Merritt, sits in the former marshlands, and should not be buried under ever more concrete infrastructure. Instead, it should be handled sensitively and developed as a water, parks, and habitat resource. The Peralta site is the least good choice.

Posted by Naomi_Schiff on 09/06/2017 at 11:08 AM

Re: “Why the Oakland A’s Should Rethink the Laney College Site

I think real problem for the A's and the city is the negative implications of rebuilding on the Coliseum site. IT would work for a year or two, and then we'd be right back to low attendance and boring product, and the inevitable move of the A's out of Oakland.

Howard Terminal sounds good on paper but will not work for many reasons, with cost of developing there being the highest. If the city wanted a stadium there, then they should have started the process of getting the many agencies involved signed off, and had the environmental impact report in hand, but that didn't happen, so it's out.

As an Oakland resident and a fan of the team, I'm pulling for the Peralta site, although I know the A's are probably stuck with where they are. It will only work there if the city eminent domain from 66th ave to high street along Coliseum way . Most of what's there can easily be relocated elsewhere. They need to create an area where people will be there whether there's a game there or not. You'd also want the fans to spend their $$ in the area, not hop in whatever mode of transportation they used and spend it outside of our city.

City leaders in SF allowed the warriors to build a stadium next to a hospital. Oakland doesn't have city officials with the smarts or creativity to get something like this done at any location.

Posted by Paula Martin2 on 09/06/2017 at 10:39 AM

Re: “Why the Oakland A’s Should Rethink the Laney College Site

I've rented in Eastlake for 5 years now, it was difficult to afford a place here then and continues to be difficult for new residents wanting to live or stay here. I can't imagine what it would turn into if there's a stadium literally down the street from me. I'm incredibly worried about what landlords and landowners would do. What would happen to the small businesses and families here that have invested their livelihoods in their communities - only to be outbid by billionaires and millionaires. I want to be able to buy a house here soon and we are close!!! I want to raise my kids in a place they remember from their childhood. It just doesn't make any sense to have a stadium here in a neighborhood next to schools and a freeway like that. I wasn't able to go to your one town hall at la estrellita. My daughter had her birthday there two years ago, loves the food. Can I promise her it'll still be there when the stadium opens? ***PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE DONT COME TO EASTLAKE/SAN ANTONIO***

Posted by Mike Boucher on 09/06/2017 at 8:32 AM

Re: “Why the Oakland A’s Should Rethink the Laney College Site

The question before the Oakland A's and the City of Oakland is very simple. What is the priority criteria for selection of a site. Is it to find a spot that gives MLB the sexy waterfront or downtown skyline money shots for TV telecasts of their product? Is it to select a site that is most fiscally responsible, has good public transit access and can stimulate economic development into the future. Part of that fiscal responsibility is reducing the need for public money on the front end and reducing disruption and impacts on the existing community.The best option that clearly met all of the criteria was the Uptown ball park behind the Fox theater that Jerry Brown scuttled in favor of apartments ten years ago. We can only imagine the vibrancy of Uptown with a new park as the anchor. What a shame. The next best option is the existing Coliseum site. Obviously, it does not have the ambiance and photographic setting that MLB wants for new parks. However, the city has made many decisions and major investments of public funds over the last 20 years in order to gain site control. All of those were in anticipation of building a sports venue of some kind. The Coliseum is on both BART and a train station stop and has direct access to I-880. It can't get any better from a transportation or infrastructure investment perspective. In addition, there are only a couple of existing business and no residents to be relocated. The only obstacle is whether a new park can stimulate economic development in a challenging surrounding neighborhood? So what is your answer Mayor? You let the Raiders walk because of fiscal responsibility. Do you apply the same criteria to the A's or do you succumb to the wishes of MLB and like Jerry Brown, make the wrong call again?

Posted by Gary Patton on 09/06/2017 at 6:54 AM

Re: “Why the Oakland A’s Should Rethink the Laney College Site

Jack London Square is only a few blocks from the 12th Street BART station, and is within walking distance of the Lake Merritt BART station. Numerous buses are also available for the few blocks involved. The railroad tracks are a VERY minor obstacle, and some fans might even choose to arrive by train. If people want a downtown ballpark experience, the Howard Terminal site is the one to pick. The Peralta site really isn't downtown, and putting a ballpark there would ruin a vibrant community with affordable, unique restaurants and other businesses. The result would be bland, boring and expensive.

Posted by Jan Van Dusen on 09/06/2017 at 3:08 AM

Re: “When Landlords Lie

I empathise with both sides, its so challenging and deeply stressful.
But the fact is many people are with fixed income..they are part of the community also..
Some with monthly checks as low as 850.00.--850. for the month.
Where do they live? Where do they go? My God. They are among the growing homeless down the streets of us all blessed to have a roof overhead,


that's where they are forced to go because of such HIGH rentals. Not everyone has such blessed incomes but we are all apart of this life.

Posted by hawnee on 09/04/2017 at 8:58 PM

Re: “East Bay Oil Terminal Expansion Stokes Fears of Air and Water Pollution

Good piece, so since Oakland did not permit oil or coal unload, move up river:) Contra Costa , by Martinez offers other locations for Philips 66, watch those locations for other covert activities/ Also spill and diesel emissions will occur at night, because no one can see them or the source and no one will report until after the fact, when people are sick. Pittsburg, Antioch, even Stockton may be next, follow the docking ports for oil and coal ships. Cheers,
Gordon Hopkins

Posted by Gordon Hopkins on 08/27/2017 at 8:02 AM

Most Popular Stories


© 2017 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation