music in the park san jose

.Heartaches by the Number

Bringing on the heartaches: David Cantwell has country's number.

music in the park san jose

Music-related lists often exist only to create controversy. Compilations of the twenty greatest guitar solos, fifty most moshworthy metal albums, or thirty most otherworldly prog-rock epics serve primarily to pad the letters to the editor section and to validate critics’ personal preferences. Though they might claim to be encouraging debate, these authors often write with an artificially authoritative tone that suggests they’re trying to end the discussion instead of prolonging it.

At first glance, Heartaches by the Number: Country Music’s 500 Greatest Singles might seem as if it’s luring readers into a similar trap. But like its inspiration, Dave Marsh’s The Heart of Rock & Soul: The 1001 Greatest Singles Ever Made, Heartaches doesn’t try to squeeze subjective assessments until they become facts. Written by Nashville-based Bill Friskics-Warren, known for his work in the Nashville Scene and The New York Times, and Kansas City’s David Cantwell, whose work has appeared in No Depression and Salon, the book tells the story of country music through brief yet detailed essays on its selections. Favoring historical importance over aesthetic value judgments, Friskics-Warren and Cantwell choose crucial touchstones rather than simply measuring the comparative quality of compelling melodies.

Readers only need to consult the first entry, Sammi Smith’s 1970 country-chart-topper “Help Me Make It through the Night,” to realize that Heartaches functions more as an entertaining textbook than as a consumer guide that measures relative excellence. In the page and a half they devote to the tune, the writers move from analysis of its opening seconds (a held violin note “suggests some greater longing”) to contextual placement (“Help Me” was a “watershed event in the history of Nashville and country music” because it integrated rock and soul influences) to lyrical insights (Kris Kristofferson’s “plea for deliverance reveals an existential weight”). Friskics-Warren and Cantwell go on to debunk the myth of country as a change-repellent art form, to explore the sexual ramifications of a single altered pronoun, and to use subtle vocal variations to chart a complex character study.

Some might quibble with assigning such portent to riffs and lines that listeners have long taken for granted, especially given that many of the artists claim their lyrics reflect personal problems rather than universal issues. The authors note such protests in their pages, but Cantwell maintains that they never stretch for meaning.

“That stuff is there to hear, but that doesn’t mean Kristofferson meant to put it there,” he explains. “Those are separate things. Kristofferson could tell you what he meant when he wrote the song, but a record by definition isn’t limited to what he meant. It’s not just the words and the melody that he came up with — it’s how they’re performed by these musicians, the way Bill Walker arranged them, the way Sammi sings them, the way those ideas intersect with the time the record was released. Really, if at some level you can’t hear something beyond the personal in a record, then why does anyone else need to hear it?”

It’s not by accident that Cantwell always uses “record” rather than “song” when discussing these singles. “Record” includes all the aforementioned elements; “song,” at its most basic, boils down to merely sheet music. A maudlin, mediocre song (Heartaches cites George Jones’ “The Battle” as an example) can become a standout record on the strength of a powerful performance and precise production; a flawlessly composed song can languish in obscurity without proper adornment. Too often, guidebooks use the terms interchangeably, mistakenly valuing the original resource more than the finished product.

Having agreed on these terms, Cantwell and Friskics-Warren began the lengthy process of narrowing country’s thousands of singles, including many that predate the album era, down to five hundred that best represent the genre’s essence and evolution. A few artists argued irrefutably for inclusion; once the givens earned their spots, the authors looked for gaps to fill, identified needs (records about back-door affairs, prison, or work, for example), and recruited the best representatives. The results are ordered rather than truly ranked, meaning the authors aren’t necessarily endorsing “Help Me” as a superior single to the number two tune (Hank Williams’ “Lost Highway”) or even, say, number 447 (Willie Nelson’s “Always on My Mind”). The order is more conceptually chronological, allowing the authors to establish themes using the most appropriate examples for evidence, then to return to these key points in later entries.

Though the format is somewhat misleading in this case, any list will provoke arguments about unworthy inclusions and snubs and, given the staunchly traditional views of country preservationists, Heartaches will definitely be no exception. Some of the choices might strike purists as crazier than Patsy Cline. Why, for example, did Elvis Presley make the top five — with the twang-free “Don’t Be Cruel”? How did Los Lobos survive the cut? On what planet is Chuck Berry a country artist? And don’t these guys get tired of hurting Ronnie Milsap, who bears the brunt of their criticism for country’s regrettable sugar-shocking early-’80s output?

“We want to make people confront the possibility of a world in which Bing Crosby, Elvis Presley, and Chuck Berry are part of the country story,” Cantwell responds, noting that artists such as Ray Price, who rates nine mentions, are also lightning rods for country cranks. “As long as we can talk about why those things are upsetting to people, that’s where the real discussion happens.” As for the much-maligned Milsap, Cantwell stands by the man’s early output, though it didn’t prove listworthy.

On paper, even Heartaches‘ most unorthodox selections make sense in the context their write-ups provide. More surprisingly, these segues work on disc as well: The Monroe Brothers’ Depression-era “What Would You Give in Exchange” bleeds into Bruce Springsteen’s desperate “Atlantic City,” their shared emotional anguish more than compensated for their varied instrumental arsenals. Unfortunately, a Heartaches box set will be, at best, a long time in coming. “I’m all for it, but it would be a licensing nightmare,” Cantwell says.

Putting together a sequel to the book a decade down the road could be an even more daunting task. Not that country is moving away from its emphasis on singles — more than any other genre, it still relies on individual tracks. Hip-hop and progressive rock singles studies would suffer because the best album cuts can be too profane or lengthy for airplay, while a metal singles primer would contain mostly power ballads that bear no resemblance to the groups’ signature sound. By contrast, mainstream country artists have never embraced the punk-spiked aesthetic that encourages willfully inaccessible material.

Still, just because a record is radio-friendly doesn’t mean the airwaves will return the affection. From young alternative voices such as Neko Case and Rex Hobart to elder statesmen such as George Jones and Willie Nelson, quality country artists find themselves barred from programming consideration and thus ineligible for singles-only studies. By contemplating how repugnant performers such as Toby Keith currently hog the market, country fans can experience the deep dread of so many of the genre’s classic songs firsthand.

But just as its bleakest tunes always offer some sliver of hope, country’s soft-shell periods always give way to a hardcore resurgence. Heartaches documents such cycles, proving that long before the ’70s outlaw movement, there were other rebels, and other weak trends against which to rebel. The book delivers a detailed diagram of country’s proud, complicated past — its oft-overlooked racial interactions, its blend of unflinching misogyny and uniquely expressed feminism, its underrated ability to incorporate assorted influences and to co-opt the methods of artists on its margins while remaining tethered to its roots — and inspires optimism for its future in the process. As such, it should rank high on any country connoisseur’s reading list.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

East Bay Express E-edition East Bay Express E-edition
music in the park san jose
19,045FansLike
14,681FollowersFollow
61,790FollowersFollow
spot_img