Memory Lame 

Godard meanders aimlessly In Praise of Love.

The French word for turkey is le dindon. With this in mind, it's fair to say that French New Wave auteur Jean-Luc Godard's latest movie, In Praise of Love (éloge de l'amour), is basically fricassé du dindon -- and none too tasty, either. Snoots will no doubt rally to its cause, trotting out threadbare standbys like "masterpiece" and "triumph," but rarely does an established filmmaker so ardently waste viewers' time with a gobbler like this. Given Godard's four decades of cinematic and sociological experimentation -- from Breathless and Weekend to King Lear and For Ever Mozart -- it's pretty shocking that this thing isn't even artsy. Barring a few brief moments of instantaneously fizzling inspiration, it's merely fartsy.

Well, fine. Under the reasonable assumption that Godard has set out to make a fartsy movie, let's assess his successes theretoward. He includes random shots of cows, horses, and French people (the last often shown smoking, but because Godard is old-school, none of the above are shown in the currently hip act of urinating). There are stretches of absurdly pretentious dialogue edited over awkward angles or black interstitials so that one has no idea who is talking or why. Probably filched from a bum poet's scribble pad, said dialogue involves references to history being replaced by technology, to landscapes seeming new only in comparison to previously known landscapes, to -- no joke, deep-thinkers -- the collapse of the gaze. Somehow, it's all to do with nostalgia and reckoning, and indeed, the, um, director seems quite confident in his jumbled mess, but the very element of fruity incomprehensibility that makes dadaism (or life itself) so appealing makes this project aggressively tedious.

If Godard is trying to say something here -- actually, he seems much more interested in obliterating his statements in mid-delivery -- it's mostly to do with memory, presumably his own spluttering sense thereof. As uppity, thirtyish know-it-all Edgar (Bruno Putzulu) struggles to create the titular éloge de l'amour, a cinematic magnum opus about the four stages of a love affair -- those'd be hooking up, doing it, dashing off, and hooking up again -- Godard grants himself license to explore at length the unrelated notion that memory may be of little use in reclaiming one's life. Nifty in theory, but all that's really going on is rusty cultural and philosophical regurgitation, via Edgar's pretty actors Eglantine (Audrey Klebaner) and Perceval (Jeremy Lippman), via his ever-failing conquest, Elle (Cécile Camp), via anyone who manages to avoid falling out of the remarkably amateurish frames of cinematographers Christophe Pollock and Julien Hirsch.

Since the thematic content of In Praise of Love is so irritatingly obtuse -- from Bayard to Bresson, Sartre to Spielberg, it's less a meditation than a name-check fiesta -- it would have been downright decent of Godard to sedate us with some suitably high-minded visuals during our 98 minutes of punishment. No such luck. The first sixty percent or so is shot clumsily on black-and-white film that makes Paris look mostly like a sad little toilet, while the remainder -- taking place two years earlier in the countryside -- is shot on digital video that literally looks like puke. If nothing else, Godard has effectively ended any debate about the value of one cinematic medium over another; slop knows no technical boundaries.

Fans of Godard -- especially classic-'60s refractory Godard -- will probably appreciate this thing despite its many faults, and possibly because of them. It's noteworthy that this is the first feature film (and video) he has shot in Paris since 1966's Masculine-Feminine, and it shares with that film a similar devil-may-care sense of style and cutting. If you enjoy random montage and a direct affront to the Hollywood machine, perhaps you'll find a reason to stay in your seat.

If only there weren't so much sneering. Honestly, it's refreshing to hear America questioned, redefined, and even mocked as a peculiar, overly proud nation wedged between Canada and Mexico (both of which are also, technically, America). It's more provocative to hear characters ranting about Hollywood boy Spielberg stealing people's stories for profit while Oskar Schindler's widow lives in poverty in Argentina. (They fail to mention author Barbara Chase-Riboud's $10 million suit against Spielberg and Co. for ripping off her book Echo of Lions to make Amistad, still a dubious matter despite an amicable settlement.) Sadly, however, it doesn't take long for Godard's attempt at a trance to turn into a tantrum, and his rants against nasty, soulless America actually make the place seem more attractive. Instead of complaining, maybe the rebel should just succumb and shoot an old-fashioned picture for DreamWorks (if they don't shoot him first).


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments will be removed.

Latest in Movie Review

Author Archives

  • Dorkula

    Blade confronts the ultimate vampire, and geeks everywhere rejoice.
    • Dec 8, 2004
  • Call Him Al

    An epic story turns human -- and fallible -- in Oliver Stone's Alexander.
    • Dec 1, 2004
  • More»

Most Popular Stories

Special Reports

Taste, Fall 2016

Everything you need to know about dining in and out in the East Bay.

The Queer & Trans Issue 2016

Queer and trans coverage contributed by individuals who identify as queer or trans.

© 2016 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation