A Shift in Solar Power 

A new law could spur the development of small solar power stations in urban areas.

For solar power to become a truly dominant energy source, it may require a paradigm shift. Currently, when people think of expanding solar energy, they may envision giant solar arrays spread across the Mojave Desert. But massive solar farms often present serious environmental challenges. They can threaten wildlife habitat and require new transmission lines in ecologically sensitive areas.

However, a new law sponsored by California's solar power industry and signed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger earlier this month could change the way we think about solar power. If the law works as intended, it could spur solar power generation in urban centers, and not in some remote desert where it could harm the environment.

The law, which was carried by state Democratic state Senator Gloria Negrete McLeod, is designed to provide financial incentives for urban developers to construct small solar power plants on their buildings, warehouses, and vacant property. Utilities such as Pacific Gas & Electric would then be required to buy the solar power at above-market rates. "It opens a whole new market that hasn't been available in California," explained Sue Kateley of the California Solar Energy Industries Association, which wrote the law. Kateley said similar programs have proven successful in seventeen countries.

Under old California law, many financial barriers blocked the expansion of solar power construction in urban areas. For example, if a business wanted to construct a solar array in Oakland, then it would be forced to compete for contracts with large companies that have access to much more land, and thus can produce power more cheaply. Moreover, if the solar panels on a building generate more energy than the building used, then the old law allowed PG&E to take the excess for free. Not surprisingly, the number of California buildings with solar panels has remained relatively low even though solar has boomed during the past decade.

But under the new law, businesses will be able to build solar stations on rooftops or vacant land with a guarantee that the power will be purchased by utilities. The law allows urban solar stations that can generate up to three megawatts of electricity — potentially enough energy to power about 1,800 households. Kateley said a recent report estimated that 5,000 megawatts of energy could be produced by such installations. The new law caps the total megawatts produced under the program at 750, but Kateley expressed confidence that the cap will be raised if the new law is successful.

The key to whether the law will work as envisioned will be the price utilities must pay for the power. Under the law, the California Public Utilities Commission will set the rate with the stipulation that it must be above market price. How high above market price will be up to the PUC to decide, and finding the right price will be pivotal. It has to be high enough to spur growth without being too high that it prompts a significant spike in consumer energy bills. "If the PUC sets the price right, it has huge potential," Kateley said.

According to Kateley and the Legislative Analyst's Office, the bill did not face much opposition from utilities. PG&E, for instance, neither supported nor opposed it. She said utility representatives told her that their existing transmission capability could handle urban solar power stations of up to three megawatts in size. Anything bigger than that would pose problems. Nonetheless, a three-megawatt solar power plant could cover twelve to 24 acres of land.

Kateley also said that a few solar power companies expressed opposition to the bill at the last minute because they were worried that the PUC won't set a high enough price. But Kateley said that supporters of the bill ultimately decided that the PUC would be the best arbiter because it monitors the rates that utilities pay existing solar energy producers.

A similar law signed by the governor that could also help spur solar power growth was known as Assembly Bill 920. Sponsored by Democratic Assemblyman Jared Huffman of San Rafael, the new law requires utilities such as PG&E to pay homeowners for the extra power that their solar rooftop panels produce.

According to Bernadette Del Chiaro, of Environment California, which sponsored the new law, state public utilities may receive at least 5,000 megawatt-hours of electricity free each year from homeowners. Under the new law, utilities must pay a rate set by the PUC or offer homeowners the option to roll over the surplus energy they produce into the next year.

Some utilities, including PG&E, opposed the law because they argued that home-generated solar power is unreliable. That is, a solar house may produce extra energy one day but not the next, depending on whether the sun was shining or whether people at home were using appliances. As a result, the utilities said they would be forced to buy energy they might not need.

However, under the new law, utilities will be able to count the solar power they buy from homeowners as "renewable energy credits" when trying to reach their state-mandated greenhouse-gas-reduction requirements. Moreover, for supporters of the bill, requiring utilities to pay for the energy they receive is a fairness issue for homeowners. "They have to invest a lot of money and it takes years to pay off the solar systems — and they have to give away energy to utilities for free," explained Lawrence Cooper, Assemblyman Huffman's legislative director.

Under the new law, the amount of energy that PG&E and others will have to buy is capped at 2.5 percent of their total peak demand. A separate bill by Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner of Berkeley would have raised the cap to 5 percent, but it stalled in the Legislature. She plans to reintroduce it next year.


Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments will be removed.

Latest in Eco Watch

  • Benicia Oil-by-Rail Battle Hinges on Legal Controversy

    Opponents of oil-by-rail shipments want the city to block a proposed Valero facility, but Valero says the city lacks this power.
    • Apr 13, 2016
  • Fish Fight

    Commercial herring fishermen want to limit what recreational anglers can catch, even though recreational fishing is more ecologically sustainable.
    • Feb 24, 2016
  • Coastal Peril

    The future of the California Coastal Commission, the agency that protects the state's scenic coast, is in jeopardy because of pro-development forces allied with Governor Jerry Brown.
    • Feb 10, 2016
  • More »

Author Archives

  • Goodbye, Express Readers

    This is my final column for the paper. It's been a great ride.
    • Mar 23, 2016
  • Oakland Can't Afford to Wait

    The city council and city administration need to immediately implement Mayor Libby Schaaf's housing plan. Plus, there's plenty more to do to deal with the city's affordability crisis.
    • Mar 16, 2016
  • More»

Most Popular Stories

Special Reports

Taste, Fall 2016

Everything you need to know about dining in and out in the East Bay.

The Queer & Trans Issue 2016

Queer and trans coverage contributed by individuals who identify as queer or trans.

© 2016 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation