John Regan 
Member since Mar 21, 2013


Stats

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Cops' Violent Past to Be Kept from Jury

The reasons judges make rulings like this are: a) it's in their best interests to protect the powers that be; and of course b) because they can, pretty much with impunity. There's no point arguing with them. They don't care about the law or about giving people fair trials.

There is one thing, short of civil unrest, that might make a difference: if lawyers in the area went on strike until the judge either reversed herself or disqualified herself.

http://strikelawyer.wordpress.com/2013/03/…

Judges need lawyers on both sides of disputes to maintain the image of a fair contest. When they consistently screw over one kind of lawyer - criminal defense lawyers and lawyers for individual plaintiffs suing large institutional litigants - they are vulnerable to a strike by those kinds of lawyers, who at that point have little or nothing to lose.

They have lawyer strikes in other countries. I've never heard of any here, but this would be a good occasion to try one.

7 likes, 9 dislikes
Posted by John Regan on 03/21/2013 at 7:27 AM

Readers' Favorites

Most Popular Stories


© 2016 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation