Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Narrow by Date

Comment Archives: Last 30 Days

Re: “Calavera

A great Uptown venue! The bar offerings, especially mezcal & tequila, are intruiging. And the food, based on their Oaxacan theme, is tasty and creative. Well worth a visit! Beautiful decor and superb food presentation. Wait staff is friendly and attentive.

Posted by Rick Rickard on 11/30/2016 at 7:13 PM

Re: “A16

The atmosphere and service were spot on and the food was so good!

Posted by Curt Peterson on 11/24/2016 at 7:37 AM

Re: “Art/Act Award and Exhibition: The Canary Project

Overview here:

Posted by Will Ross on 11/20/2016 at 12:45 PM

Re: “Till We Meet Again

Great travel adventure!

Posted by Tom McNelly on 11/17/2016 at 10:55 AM

Re: “Till We Meet Again

An amazing slow pay off indie drama, which build more and more for every minute!

Posted by Patrick Johnsson on 11/17/2016 at 10:54 AM

Re: “DJ Night

Dj O Aces is in the house on Thursday's. If you want to experience transitions like never before. This night is for you. Hip Hop, Top 40, R&B.

Posted by Orlando Williams (DJ OAces) on 11/30/2016 at 8:51 PM

Re: “1300 on Fillmore

we took a group of 12 to 1300 on Fillmore and were very disappointed. We had a set menu planned for the group but were served a completely different menu. Service was slow and quite sloppy, food was just ok. Lastly the atmosphere was poor, music was much too loud.

Posted by Curt Peterson on 11/24/2016 at 7:35 AM

Re: “Arabic Fusion Comes to Berkeley with Saha

Correction Marmee Manak a seasoned sommelier who has worked alongside This incredible chef for many years. She has travelled internationally to organic: biodynamic wine festivals and visit domestically many of our vineyards to experience the land. I'm enticed to dine there for both the food and exquisite wines.

Posted by Dana-Lee Smirin on 12/11/2016 at 1:17 AM

Re: “Arabic Fusion Comes to Berkeley with Saha

And you didn't even try the biodynamic wines paired so beautifully to each dish it seems. Somalier Marmee Marnak has scoured the world seeking wines that enliven our being.

Posted by Dana-Lee Smirin on 12/11/2016 at 1:08 AM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

Neither of the financing structures would expose the general fund. The district is set up so that it can issue the bonds to finance infrastructure (i disagree with your take that the stadium isn't considered a public works project here, but that is immaterial). If the project fails, the district declares the bankruptcy not the city. The city and county would fund the district staff and admin costs and then the district would become a self-financing entity. Private issue bonds are also issued by other than the city and county so that party would be responsible for them if the project financials don't support repayment of the principal and interest. The interest rates for these debt issues will be higher than for the city and county, but this project must be a money-maker for the private investment group to want any part of it. The city and county would be stupid not to take it for the development alone. The costs to secure the site should the Raiders and A's move would be as much as the investment they're being asked to make here. The difference is they get some political points and a stadium which produces additional city revenue and creates additional jobs in the area. The math on stadia is traditionally based on a much more hefty investment by the city and county.

As for why folks still discuss Mt. Davis, I can only assume a lack of formal economics training and education as those are considered sunk costs. The city and county will be on he hook for them whether the Raiders are using the stadium/land or not. So is it disingenuous to add those costs to this project. Those costs are due either way. The difference here is that they can be due and the city receiving revenue from use of the stadium or they can be due with absolutely zero offsetting revenue.

The only real question is whether or not the group is trying to get Mark Davis to sell them part of the team as a condition.

Posted by coachglove on 12/10/2016 at 9:29 PM

Re: “Oakland Firefighters Say Their Department Is So Badly Managed, Ghost Ship Warehouse Wasn't Even In Its Inspection Database

Useful information to pass on to readers, no matter how contradictory, conflicting, self-serving, and chaotic it may be. This isn't yet another straightforward Oakland budget fight, pitting department against department, neighborhood against neighborhood for gaining more city funding and resources, politician jockeying for position against other politicians. This also involves defending reputation that one or one's fellow staffers bore any responsibility for those deaths.

This kind of infighting is often seen in both the public and private sector organizations when leaders are ineffectual, ignorant, inexperienced, or just not capable of gaining the respect of the people under their responsibility.

I think both MS Kaplan and Mr. Patton are correct that mismanagement starts in the Mayors office, extends thru the City Administrator, and is reflected in incompetent, ineffectual department heads and upper management.

An Oakland mayor does not need to personally have the management skills of ex NYC Mayor Bloomberg, but they have to know how to find a City Administrator who does.. And we don't have to go back to the City Manager form of government that we had before Measure X. Few cities of our size or bigger kept the City Manager structure as they grew.

Regardless of why Mayor Schaaf chose Sabrina Landreth as City Administrator, it is time for Landreth to move on and for Schaaf to break the pattern set by Dellums and Quan of selecting unexperienced or inexperienced City Administrators. Find someone with solid line management experience in a much bigger city, either at the top or just below the chain of command. Not a manager or administrator from a tiny city who you hope will grow into the job. We might well have to offer a much longer, sweeter contract than normal to get that City Administrator. We might have to recruit form the non-profit or the for-profit sectors.

We can't afford to keep stumbling on from one departmental disaster to another.

Posted by Len Raphael on 12/10/2016 at 8:39 PM

Re: “Coal Terminal Developer Suing City of Oakland, Seeking to Overturn Ban on Fossil Fuel Exports

mmarteeen, where are you seeing uncovered coal cars next to the 880 near Jack London? Those are covered oil tanker cars, my friend. They are bad bad bad and may contain Bakken crude, which is explosive and dirty, but it ain't coal.

Posted by Jessea Greenman on 12/10/2016 at 8:37 PM
Posted by Rick Gower on 12/10/2016 at 8:27 PM

Re: “Oakland Firefighters Say Their Department Is So Badly Managed, Ghost Ship Warehouse Wasn't Even In Its Inspection Database

There is a vast group of retired firefrighters who have eperience and training, that could be pqassed on to the now acive members, This cadre of firefighters, engineers, and officers, is wide and deep in experience, and manyu would be happy an proud to come to service for the city to train, educate, and have the history necessary to mainyain an excellent department We have at least three or four members who retired as chiefs of other departments, such as Richmond, South San Francisco, and other major departments in the bay area, who shouold have been considered for the chiefs job in Oakland.
Just contact the retirement office and you will find all the names and places of these dedeicated, highy trained individuals.

Posted by Rick Gower on 12/10/2016 at 8:26 PM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

I have one thing to say: Raiders, go to Las Vegas. Please.
Take your team, your rep, and your game somewhere else.
Why should Oakland go begging for this when we have residents who are hardcore fans getting turned out by greed and gentrification? Raiders were a part of Oakland culture but apparently we need to burn dollars at the feet of their owners to make them love us as much as we love them. Screw that.

Posted by whitney smith on 12/10/2016 at 8:25 PM

Re: “Oakland Firefighters Say Their Department Is So Badly Managed, Ghost Ship Warehouse Wasn't Even In Its Inspection Database

The fire chief is a retired fire Capt. from San Jose FD. When she interviewed for the position, the panel said she was the worst candidate they had. Were surprised she got the position. The Oakland city manager, was a friend of hers from city of San Jose. She was given the position. She is collecting a retirement and a salary from the City of Oakland. There others in the department, that were more qualified than her. That knew the city and needs of department. I am making a assumption, that they needed someone from the outside to cut costs.

Posted by Bea Burg on 12/10/2016 at 5:06 PM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

The citizens of Oakland should be very wary of Mayor Schaaf and her assertion on one hand that there will be no public money and on the other hand, the deal includes throwing in $150 million, the value of the (public) land, plus $350 million (plus $95 million to pay off Mt. Al) in infrastructure to be financed by private bonds and repaid from stadium revenues. The people of Oakland and the City Council need to ask a lot of questions on the record about this bond approach prior to approval. Who is left holding the bag if the revenues are not there? When and where has this private bond financing approach for public projects been used and what was the outcome? I am skeptical of any new, never tried wall street financing instruments. Many cities over the last 20 years have been holding the bag on projects that they wanted so bad, they were willing to experiment with non traditional financing. At the end of the day, the Mayor needs to be honest with the public. Don't play word games. I don't personally have a problem with the city giving away the land. The Redevelopment Agency acquired those parcels along Hegenberger Rd for the sole purpose of a new stadium construction project. I am worried that she will get out in front of this before knowing the details and once again for the citizens of Oakland, it will be ready, shoot, aim.

Posted by Gary Patton on 12/10/2016 at 5:02 PM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

Schaaf came into office insisting no public money for a stadium. Now she offers the spoiled owner of the Raiders public money. She wants the City to pour one or two hundred million dollars into bonds that would be repaid by anticipated tax revenues from development. These tax revenues should support and normally would support City services -- but here they would be diverted into paying off bonds that built stuff of benefit to the Raiders owner. Schaaf lies.

Posted by Charlie Pine on 12/10/2016 at 11:27 AM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

Wait... The city doesn't have enough money to staff basic things like fire and building inspectors, but thinks there is money for this? WTF?!?! Screw that! Raiders go away!

Posted by Bruce Ferrell on 12/10/2016 at 10:34 AM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

No, no, no! Football is not a sport. It's a glorified method by which society promotes the ongoing creation of traumatic brain injuries. There are so many better ways to spend that money.

Posted by Cyrus 1 on 12/10/2016 at 9:41 AM

Most Popular Stories

© 2016 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation