Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: stories: News & Opinion: Legalization Nation

Re: “Ten Cannabis Companies to Rule Them All?

WE DON'T NEED THE GOVERNMENT...........WE DON'T NEED THE FAT CATS.......WE DON'T NEED THE GREED , ... We have had the greed of Big Pharma, fleecing the wool of the sick, and Dying, making money from our suffering in the name of safe regulation. Cannabis is the safest plant in the world , it doesn't need regulation, in fact the chemicals in cannabis are made in our bodies by our ECS, or Endocannabinoid system it is harmless, and non toxic. Take a lesson from Canada where patients can't afford their medicine, and are fighting for the right to grow, The Bill introduced in Texas, where cannabis will be allowed to be grown like tomatoes, this is the true meaning of freedom, Let us create the World Nikola Tessla envisioned while we have the chance.

48 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Granger Null on 03/11/2015 at 9:27 AM

Re: “Ten Cannabis Companies to Rule Them All?

Actually there's 3 GOOD guys, and ResponsibleOhio has been rejected once already for bad ballot language and not sayin where 100% of tax goes only 55%(and unapportioned taxes are FEDERALLY illegal.) NO2RO!!!

12 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Tom Manson on 03/11/2015 at 8:21 AM

Re: “Ten Cannabis Companies to Rule Them All?
We're the good guys!

8 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by Linda Schlichterle Pardee on 03/11/2015 at 7:54 AM

Re: “Ten Cannabis Companies to Rule Them All?

Support Responsible Ohioians for Cannabis PAC!

12 likes, 14 dislikes
Posted by Mike Werling on 03/11/2015 at 7:45 AM

Re: “Ten Cannabis Companies to Rule Them All?


4 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by VeganChef Jeff Ridabock on 03/11/2015 at 6:44 AM

Re: “Why California Weed Is Still the Best

You think Colorado doesn't have it's share of "old hippies?" Have you been to Boulder? Colorado growers have also placed very high in cannabis cups in Amsterdam too. Looks like you should do a little more research.

3 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by Alex Fikany on 03/06/2015 at 4:35 PM

Re: “Umm, Thanks, Republicans?

Good of him to point out that cannabis was illegal for so many years basically because the religious authoritarians in government don't like the people they think are the main users of the plant.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Ory Plotkin on 03/03/2015 at 1:12 PM

Re: “Umm, Thanks, Republicans?

Well ain't that a b***h.

Posted by Ed Jones Jr. on 02/27/2015 at 11:24 PM

Re: “Why California Weed Is Still the Best

This comment was deleted because it violates our website's Terms Of Use. People who repeatedly violate our policies will lose their ability to post comments. You can read our entire Terms Of Use here.

Posted by Editor on 02/25/2015 at 1:35 AM

Re: “Why California Weed Is Still the Best

This comment was removed because it violates our policy against anonymous comments. It will be reposted if the commenter chooses to use his or her real name.

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Editor on 02/23/2015 at 7:01 AM

Re: “The Weed War Undermines Science

Senor "John Thomas" sez:

"It seems you are simply anti-business. So what would be your preferred way of distributing marijuana - through the government?"

Lots of us aren't simply anti-business. We think that the effort to create an industry to produce and distribute a drug from a weed that can grow well virtually anywhere is essentially anti-social and exploitative. This industry rises out of, and is dependent upon, the very destructive Federal War on Drugs. The legacy of the Federal War on Drugs should simply be abolished by legalizing pot. Period. End of story.

Grow your own. Put a seed in a pot on your front porch. Use a vaporizer to save your lungs.

Screw the pot capitalists and screw the governmental drug war lunatics.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Hobart Johnson on 02/17/2015 at 1:20 PM

Re: “The Weed War Undermines Science

@Mike Dar

There sure is a lot of reading-between-the-lines going on in these comments. I don't see that the author has exonerated any businesses who unethical/criminal, or have actually conspired with the fraudster prohibitionists. He's simply addressing the fledgling marijuana industry.

And he's clearly not making an attempt to describe all the malicious forces working to perpetuate the insane war on marijuana consumers. Why you are taking him to task for his focus is perplexing. Sometimes we look at the big picture. Other times we want a close-up look at certain aspects.

How do " illegal campaign contributions to State Official candidates" undermine science? Your insistence the author NOT focus as he does is strange, to say the least.

It seems you are simply anti-business. So what would be your preferred way of distributing marijuana - through the government?

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by John Thomas on 02/12/2015 at 9:02 PM

Re: “The Weed War Undermines Science


>>>"a flawed assumption. That is, that "Science" is a static state of knowledge of what is true, good, and known to be right- by you, the author."

It's clear Downs is giving us a window on the general state of science by focusing on the state of marijuana research and policy at the current time.

I don't think he's operating under your described assumption at all. This all seems more of an assumption on your part - or worse, a contrived attack on the solid marijuana research and propping up of the biased "science."

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by John Thomas on 02/12/2015 at 8:47 PM

Re: “The Weed War Undermines Science

@Hobart Johnson

I'm sorry. I couldn't get past this:

>>>"The good professor is addressing mostly bad people."

Please explain that incredible assumption.

Posted by John Thomas on 02/12/2015 at 8:35 PM

Re: “The Weed War Undermines Science

It's not difficult to construe the cannabis biz essentially as anathema to rational public policy regarding cannabis. The good professor is addressing mostly bad people.

Similarly the medical marijuana biz isn't doing good public policy any favors.

Bottom line is cannabis should be legalized for whatever use. There needs to be some regulation in an effort to protect young people from excessive use. Cannabis is generally not harmful to health and is quite evidently beneficial to many people as a drug or a nutrient. It has many industrial uses.

Let's get rational, please, folks, and get beyond the ongoing nightmare promulgated by the cannabis-phobic and the cannabis-biz. It's long past time to get beyond the impasse.

1 like, 2 dislikes
Posted by Hobart Johnson on 02/12/2015 at 5:55 PM

Re: “The Weed War Undermines Science

I have a problem with your opening comment which lumps the people you don't like all together under a flawed assumption. That is, that "Science" is a static state of knowledge of what is true, good, and known to be right- by you, the author.
You then go on to interview an authority on the issue of academic and scientific freedom from institutional bias. True science, one might say, an evolving body of evidence. Evidence that could in some future time provide fodder for your opponents no matter what the source or motivation. Is this what you seek to protect?
And if it is; is protecting intellectual and health freedom is only pertinent to your pet issues?

0 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by roberttownsenddc346c on 02/12/2015 at 11:58 AM

Re: “The Weed War Undermines Science

"At some point, these [business] folks will come across this information, so I want to make sure they know how to evaluate it critically and make thoughtful decisions about it."

At some point... some Doctors are going to point out that "business" folks of one area, ARE THE PROBLEM. To say, the Doctor isn't rocking the boat by pointing out the AMA involvement with the HHS-NIH-NIDA-ONDCP and Federal taxes going to "businesses" whom propagate the lies.
Nor does the Doctor place any responsibility in the different Government programs where it is entirely legal for those government programs to lie.. and in fact, required to lie, to fulfill their "Mandate".
Nor does the Doctor mention the illegal campaign contributions to State Official candidates for their Election Campaigns from Federal tax dollars.

I understand the Doctors fear of actually rocking the boat... and here... he is simply trying to 'steer the boat'. All the while understanding most of these for-mentioned paradigms in the Mj prohibition, which, if only the Doctors would come forward with, would take over the course of medically applied THC and Cannabinoids... away from the "businesses" that only wish to utilize the benefits, when and where and if... they chose.

1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by Mike Dar on 02/12/2015 at 3:37 AM

Re: “The Weed War Undermines Science

Health concerns regarding marijuana tend to come from a self-fueling group of discredited scientists funded by the pharmaceutical, prison, tobacco, and alcohol industries. They push non-peer-reviewed papers, fraught with conjecture and confounding variables, while relying upon reports issued by others in their own group to further support their own grossly misleading research and clearly biased agendas.

Here's what real science says:

Daily Marijuana Use Is Not Associated with Brain Morphometric Measures in Adolescents or Adults

"No statistically significant differences were found between daily users and nonusers on volume or shape in the regions of interest. Effect sizes suggest that the failure to find differences was not due to a lack of statistical power, but rather was due to the lack of even a modest effect. In sum, the results indicate that, when carefully controlling for alcohol use, gender, age, and other variables, there is no association between marijuana use and standard volumetric or shape measurements of subcortical structures."

The Journal of Neuroscience, 28 January 2015, 35(4): 1505-1512; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2946-14.2015

7 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Malcolm Kyle on 02/11/2015 at 3:52 AM

Re: “The 2016 Election Is Closer Than You Think

I'd like to see some proof that it was "greedy growers and dispensary owners" who defeated Prop. 19. The people who I know who publicly fought Prop. 19, and spent a lot of time and money doing so, were MEDICAL MARIJUANA PATIENTS, people who value cannabis as a plant with many uses, and who KNEW HOW TO READ. Anyone who values cannabis who read Prop. 19 carefully was horrified at what it would do -- like allowing unlimited taxes on marijuana still GROWING in your house or backyard! And cannabis would have been the ONLY crop subject to such a tax, because the California Constitution protects growing crops from taxation! So, the same people who brought us Prop. 19 are back, as the California Reform Coalition, led by Dale Skye Jones, the "Princess of Pot" who, with her husband Jeff Jones and Mike Grey, went down in flames on a debate on Prop. 19 at the LA HempCon against Lanette Davies, Dragonfly de la Luz, and me. The only decent initiative is, and has always been, Jack Herer's California Cannabis Hemp Initiative: CCHI. In a December 2013 Field Poll, 56 percent of voters read the CCHI ballot summary decided to vote yes on legalization. Before hearing what CCHI would do, the poll showed 55 percent yes, 43 percent no, and 2 percent undecided. After hearing the CCHI summary, the figures shifted to 56 percent yes, 39 percent no, and 6 percent undecided.

Posted by letitiapepper on 02/02/2015 at 12:48 PM

Most Popular Stories

© 2017 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation