Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range
    • From:

      To:


Comment Archives: stories: Blogs: Culture Spy

Re: “Oakland Animal Shelter at 200% Capacity

Pitbulls aren't dangerous breeds, only dangerous people that breed them. And what a negative and hateful thing to say when these lives are at risk. Smh....

76 likes, 7 dislikes
Posted by Renata Olczakova on 07/26/2015 at 9:46 AM

Re: “Oakland Animal Shelter at 200% Capacity

You cannot adopt your way out of this over breeding problem. These dangerous breeds will be placed in homes and someone will be attacked. I hope when that happens this shelter will be sued as they should be.

15 likes, 117 dislikes
Posted by Dennis Baker on 07/26/2015 at 8:52 AM

Re: “Oakland Animal Shelter at 200% Capacity

This comment was removed because it violates our policy against anonymous comments. It will be reposted if the commenter chooses to use his or her real name.

26 likes, 9 dislikes
Posted by Editor on 07/25/2015 at 9:14 PM

Re: “Oakland's Humanist Hall Declared a Nuisance

Ridiculous charge. What the city should be concerned with is whether it is structurally and fire safe.

5 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Len Raphael on 07/25/2015 at 8:29 PM

Re: “Oakland Animal Shelter at 200% Capacity

This comment was removed because it violates our policy against anonymous comments. It will be reposted if the commenter chooses to use his or her real name.

14 likes, 64 dislikes
Posted by Editor on 07/24/2015 at 3:38 PM

Re: “Oakland Animal Shelter at 200% Capacity

Call Nathan Winograd, he lives there and he knows of 17 million homes just begging for pets.

19 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Harve Morgan on 07/24/2015 at 3:31 PM

Re: “Oakland Animal Shelter at 200% Capacity

Please do consider adopting 100% of your household's canine capacity.

28 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Bradley Vaccaro on 07/24/2015 at 1:58 PM

Re: “Oakland's Humanist Hall Declared a Nuisance

Marty, we here at Humanist Hall circulated the petition in opposition to the "declaration of public nuisance" and it quickly got 1,500 signatures (now 1,700). The handful of condo homeowners did not create a petition but only work anonymously through city authorities. We only want to carry on in the great tradition of public service of your dad and all of the other great people who were here all the way back to Reverend A. D. Faupel in 1935. Hopefully, the tradition of public service will continue long after us at Humanist Hall.

9 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Florence Windfall on 07/23/2015 at 10:20 PM

Re: “Oakland's Humanist Hall Declared a Nuisance

Here is a petition to save Humanist Hall:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/706/033/573/please-remove-the-nuisance-property-status-of-humanist-hall-now/

10 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Justine Sarfan on 07/23/2015 at 1:19 PM

Re: “Oakland's Humanist Hall Declared a Nuisance

I had my queer wedding at humanist hall and never would have been able to afford to celebrate anywhere else in the Bay. I've been to dozens of amazing community events here. Even the idea that the city would fine HH for the "nuisance" of holding an event for SF women against rape indicates how screwed up their priorities are. Stop hiding behind bureaucratic indifference, Oakland. Rescind the fine and affirm the importance of community gathering spaces. Pass legislation if you have to.

15 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Adele Carpenter on 07/23/2015 at 9:12 AM

Re: “Oakland's Humanist Hall Declared a Nuisance

If there is a petition to save the Humanist Hall, where is it and how do I sign it?

6 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by J.W.T. Meakin on 07/22/2015 at 11:50 PM

Re: “Oakland's Humanist Hall Declared a Nuisance

Who's around there to complain? Is this a set-up to try to get the property for some new million-dollar condos for the Google set?

10 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Steven Lavoie on 07/22/2015 at 10:14 PM

Re: “Oakland Playwright Says Berkeley Rep Theatre Discriminated Against Black Audience Members

This comment was removed because it violates our policy against anonymous comments. It will be reposted if the commenter chooses to use his or her real name.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Editor on 07/22/2015 at 8:01 PM

Re: “Oakland's Humanist Hall Declared a Nuisance

I was a member of the Fellowship of Humanity, attended many meetings in the Humanist Hall, and even slept there a short time when I was homeless. SAVE THIS SPACE!

11 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Gene Gordon on 07/22/2015 at 8:09 AM

Re: “Oakland's Humanist Hall Declared a Nuisance

Who said there are no condos there... ? Having watched the youtube footage of our friend Thomas Lo, Im guessing he lives in the "contemporary Mediterranean lofts" at 426 27th Street. They were built in 2003, so the timing would be right that the noise complaints would start rolling in from that building right about 2005.

13 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by shey marie on 07/22/2015 at 2:16 AM

Re: “Oakland's Humanist Hall Declared a Nuisance

Thank God, or not-god in the case of the Humanists that the fine, upstanding government of the city of Oakland has taken the brave stand of declaring a nuisance exactly where a nuisance ought to be: where people celebrate significant life events, where people explore creative ideas, where people talk about social justice.

A nuisance indeed.

City hall, that is.

24 likes, 8 dislikes
Posted by Hobart Johnson on 07/21/2015 at 5:13 PM

Re: “Oakland's Humanist Hall Declared a Nuisance

The Humanist Center has an important history in our community providing us with a center that is affordable to working-class people. I have attended a range of events there ranging from a talk by a local journalist returned from the Middle East to my friends combination birthday celebration/art show. The city needs to work with the center not label it a nuisance or impose unreasonable fines.

22 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Candy Wright on 07/21/2015 at 4:38 PM

Re: “Oakland's Humanist Hall Declared a Nuisance

The first sentence of the article is not clear. Over 1500 people have signed a petition stating that they DO NOT believe the Humanist Hall is a nuisance or should be considered a nuisance. You should consider clarifying. Also has the city officially declared the Humanist Hall a nuisance? Or is it just Thomas Lo and some other nameless neighbors? Have the neighbors who have complained declared themselves publicly? Is it public record?

11 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Kahlil Karn 1 on 07/21/2015 at 3:30 PM

Re: “Oakland's Humanist Hall Declared a Nuisance

My wife and I were married at the Humanist Hall in March. We abided by the 10pm sound restriction, and had a wonderful time with friends and family. We would not have been able to afford such a wonderful event at any other venue, as the Humanist Hall is priced to accommodate the needs of the community. Please support this Oakland treasure.

31 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Lou Vaile on 07/21/2015 at 3:23 PM

Re: “Oakland's Humanist Hall Declared a Nuisance

The 1500 signatories are supporters of the church, not opponents. And I don't know why you're blaming "condo owners" for this; there are no condos anywhere near the church. The only residential structure nearby is a set of townhomes, built over a decade ago.

17 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by C.J. Garrett on 07/21/2015 at 2:28 PM

© 2016 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation