Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: stories: Blogs

Re: “Actual Cafe and Victory Burger to Close on December 23

This is so sad. I love this place. It's always packed, I had no idea it could be losing money.

Posted by BostonMeow on 12/17/2016 at 2:37 AM

Re: “Oakland Musicians Unite For Ghost Ship Fire Benefit At Fox Theater

And still, the former residents have received almost none of the funds raised by any organization or individual. They are all still homeless, living on couches or in cars, without basic medications, eyeglasses, etc. While the issue of safe spaces and accessible housing for artists is vitally important, can we not forget these individuals when we are raising funds for the victims. I know we are all victims of this fire, in a sense, but it's time to get these folks some help.

Posted by Elizabeth von der Ahe on 12/16/2016 at 10:04 AM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

Thank you for your miracle Doctor Osemu Okpamen

This article is dedicated to the Doctor Osemu Okpamen. I have been married with my wife for 5 years and recently she broke up with me and it hurt me deeply when she told me to leave her alone and that she does not love me anymore when i was always faithful and honest to her. I tried all the ways to get her back buying her what she wants like i always did and she still left me heart broken and she even has a new boyfriend which destroyed me even more until a friend of mine from high school directed me to this genuine spell Doctor called Osemu Okpamen. This man changed my life completely. I followed everything he told me to do and my wife came back begging for me back. I was stunned everything happened exactly like he told me. I had faith in everything he told me and everything was true. Also he was there every moment until i got my happiness back and he also provides spells that cures impotence, bareness, diseases such as HIV/AID E.T.C You can contact him via email at { Doctorokpamenspelltemple@yahoo.com } or visit his website http://www.doctorokpamenspells.com. He will help you in anything you need and quick to answer once you contact him.

You can also call me for more info +1 (914)-517-3229.

Posted by Mayor Vargas 2 on 12/15/2016 at 12:11 PM

Re: “Town Business: Oakland vs. ICE

This article is dedicated to the Doctor Osemu Okpamen. I have been married with my wife for 5 years and recently she broke up with me and it hurt me deeply when she told me to leave her alone and that she does not love me anymore when i was always faithful and honest to her. I tried all the ways to get her back buying her what she wants like i always did and she still left me heart broken and she even has a new boyfriend which destroyed me even more until a friend of mine from high school directed me to this genuine spell Doctor called Osemu Okpamen. This man changed my life completely. I followed everything he told me to do and my wife came back begging for me back. I had faith in everything he told me. Also he was there every moment until i got my happiness back and he also provides spells that cures impotence, bareness, diseases such as HIV/AID E.T.C. You can contact him via email at { Doctorokpamenspelltemple@yahoo.com } or call me for more info +1 (914)-517-3229.

Posted by Mayor Vargas 2 on 12/15/2016 at 12:10 PM

Re: “Jack's Oyster Bar Shutters in Jack London Square

Thanks for calling the neighboring business for the scoop, Luke, Your journalistic duty has been fulfilled.

Posted by Matt_Chambers on 12/14/2016 at 9:58 PM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

The IFDA is created by our local governments. It issues bonds, spends the money, then pays back the bondholders from property taxes. It assumes that there will be lots of new construction and therefore lots of new property tax income. But if there's not enough new income to pay back the bondholders, the likely outcome isn't bankruptcy, it's renegotiation of the pay back terms, stretching them out so that ourlocal governments can afford the payments. In other words, we'll be on the hook for them and, god knows, probably for the seat licenses as well.

Posted by Mike Bradley on 12/14/2016 at 10:41 AM
Posted by Tia Katrina Taruc Canlas on 12/13/2016 at 6:37 PM

Re: “Class Action Lawsuit Alleges Caltrans Is Violating Homeless People's Constitutional Rights

Doesn't seem very cost effective Caltrans! Fresno had an identical policy and it resulted in a ~$1.5 million settlement in favor of the homeless plantiffs,
https://www.aclunc.org/our-work/legal-dock…

Posted by Chantrea Nok on 12/13/2016 at 4:27 PM

Re: “Coal Terminal Developer Suing City of Oakland, Seeking to Overturn Ban on Fossil Fuel Exports

Seriously? Oakland DID THIS DUMB THING?

Oakland is going to pay this man a fortune in our tax dollars.

Posted by Charles C. Eroster on 12/12/2016 at 7:11 PM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

The City and County have not done their due diligence on Fortress Investment Group. They have a bad history with sports events, including the 2010 Vancouver Olympics and the recent taking Milwaukee and Wisconsin hostage for public subsidies for the Milwaukee Bucks new basketball arena. See the story: http://mortgageflimflam.com/

Posted by Ralph Kanz on 12/12/2016 at 3:19 PM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

as usual-sports win over arts and music-the safety of artists, musicians etc should be paramount. a rarely used stadium is a total waste of taxpayer dollars.
I've never seen one of these deals work as planned-cities and counties get left holding the bag. don't do it Oakland!
let vegas can have 'em
sickens me.

Posted by marty bauer on 12/12/2016 at 1:31 PM

Re: “Couple In Charge of Ghost Ship Lost Kids to Child Protective Services While Living in Oakland Warehouse

When are the media going to dig deep enough to find out if any insurance company had a policy on that warehouse owned by Chor Ng? And did Chor Ng have all her buildings under one corporate umbrella, or was each a separate situation?

Like...questions that get asked by responsible grown ups, instead of tributes about the different kinds of music and how people FEEL about this.

Posted by Charles C. Eroster on 12/12/2016 at 6:45 AM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

Get the Raiders to cough up the $95m that's owed onnthe existing facility... it's owed thanks to the earlier enticementbyo bring the team back and to satisfy Al Davis's desire for luxury boxes that didn't sell and didn't generate revenue... andvthe Coliseum WAS NEVER ABLE to host a Super Bowl because even with all that was spent, the capacity was insufficient for the NFL to allow Oakland to host.

Posted by Larry Medina on 12/11/2016 at 4:52 PM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

NOT ONE DIME for the Raiders. Fund the Public Works Department instead! Unlike City Council, PW actually does something useful. Use "surplus" public land to provide housing for middle income people, and keep building until rents become reasonable again. Oakland streets ruin cars and kill bicyclists and pedestrians; our median strips feature dead bushes, weeds, and garbage. The homeless are forced to camp under overpasses, with zero city amenities provided. Trees have not been trimmed in years, and some parks have had little or no attention for just as long. OPD tells us to "download a report," and complains of understaffing while apparently staffed sufficiently to abuse its authority. We need City Government to focus on providing BASIC CITY SERVICES. Let the Raiders go.

Posted by Jan Van Dusen on 12/11/2016 at 2:30 PM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

Neither of the financing structures would expose the general fund. The district is set up so that it can issue the bonds to finance infrastructure (i disagree with your take that the stadium isn't considered a public works project here, but that is immaterial). If the project fails, the district declares the bankruptcy not the city. The city and county would fund the district staff and admin costs and then the district would become a self-financing entity. Private issue bonds are also issued by other than the city and county so that party would be responsible for them if the project financials don't support repayment of the principal and interest. The interest rates for these debt issues will be higher than for the city and county, but this project must be a money-maker for the private investment group to want any part of it. The city and county would be stupid not to take it for the development alone. The costs to secure the site should the Raiders and A's move would be as much as the investment they're being asked to make here. The difference is they get some political points and a stadium which produces additional city revenue and creates additional jobs in the area. The math on stadia is traditionally based on a much more hefty investment by the city and county.

As for why folks still discuss Mt. Davis, I can only assume a lack of formal economics training and education as those are considered sunk costs. The city and county will be on he hook for them whether the Raiders are using the stadium/land or not. So is it disingenuous to add those costs to this project. Those costs are due either way. The difference here is that they can be due and the city receiving revenue from use of the stadium or they can be due with absolutely zero offsetting revenue.

The only real question is whether or not the group is trying to get Mark Davis to sell them part of the team as a condition.

Posted by coachglove on 12/10/2016 at 9:29 PM

Re: “Coal Terminal Developer Suing City of Oakland, Seeking to Overturn Ban on Fossil Fuel Exports

mmarteeen, where are you seeing uncovered coal cars next to the 880 near Jack London? Those are covered oil tanker cars, my friend. They are bad bad bad and may contain Bakken crude, which is explosive and dirty, but it ain't coal.

Posted by Jessea Greenman on 12/10/2016 at 8:37 PM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

I have one thing to say: Raiders, go to Las Vegas. Please.
Take your team, your rep, and your game somewhere else.
Why should Oakland go begging for this when we have residents who are hardcore fans getting turned out by greed and gentrification? Raiders were a part of Oakland culture but apparently we need to burn dollars at the feet of their owners to make them love us as much as we love them. Screw that.

Posted by whitney smith on 12/10/2016 at 8:25 PM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

The citizens of Oakland should be very wary of Mayor Schaaf and her assertion on one hand that there will be no public money and on the other hand, the deal includes throwing in $150 million, the value of the (public) land, plus $350 million (plus $95 million to pay off Mt. Al) in infrastructure to be financed by private bonds and repaid from stadium revenues. The people of Oakland and the City Council need to ask a lot of questions on the record about this bond approach prior to approval. Who is left holding the bag if the revenues are not there? When and where has this private bond financing approach for public projects been used and what was the outcome? I am skeptical of any new, never tried wall street financing instruments. Many cities over the last 20 years have been holding the bag on projects that they wanted so bad, they were willing to experiment with non traditional financing. At the end of the day, the Mayor needs to be honest with the public. Don't play word games. I don't personally have a problem with the city giving away the land. The Redevelopment Agency acquired those parcels along Hegenberger Rd for the sole purpose of a new stadium construction project. I am worried that she will get out in front of this before knowing the details and once again for the citizens of Oakland, it will be ready, shoot, aim.

Posted by Gary Patton on 12/10/2016 at 5:02 PM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

Schaaf came into office insisting no public money for a stadium. Now she offers the spoiled owner of the Raiders public money. She wants the City to pour one or two hundred million dollars into bonds that would be repaid by anticipated tax revenues from development. These tax revenues should support and normally would support City services -- but here they would be diverted into paying off bonds that built stuff of benefit to the Raiders owner. Schaaf lies.

Posted by Charlie Pine on 12/10/2016 at 11:27 AM

Re: “Oakland to Vote on $350 Million Public Subsidy for New $1.3 Billion Raiders Stadium This Tuesday

Wait... The city doesn't have enough money to staff basic things like fire and building inspectors, but thinks there is money for this? WTF?!?! Screw that! Raiders go away!

Posted by Bruce Ferrell on 12/10/2016 at 10:34 AM

Most Popular Stories


© 2017 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation