Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: stories: News & Opinion: Endorsements

Re: “Vote McLaughlin, Beckles, Myrick, and Eduardo Martinez for Richmond City Council

Jim Rogers is bad news. He was going to be disbarred by the California Bar for unscrupulous law practices, but quit before he was disbarred. See your own EBX article here: http://www.eastbayexpress.com/oakland/sett…
How the hell did he get on the Richmond City Council? Who would hire him knowing was going to be disbarred? Why should the voters of Richmond hire him? BTW, he is not an independent. He is now on the Chevron bandwagon, and is also being supported by the National Realtors Association. He also voted for the casino at Pt. Molate, voting "yes" with Nat Bates after the voters of Richmond sent out a resounding "no". Do not vote for Jim Rogers!

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Jeannette Kortz 1 on 10/29/2014 at 1:43 PM

Re: “The Express’ 2014 Endorsements

"Oakland Rising Action conducted a study of the candidates, their positions, actions and experience and ranked mayoral choices as 1) Siegel, 2) Quan and 3) Schaff."

A "study" to be sure.

Oakland Rising is funded largely by the City of Oakland and those who are most likely to continue this funding include Siegel, Quan and Schaaf.

6 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Hobart Johnson on 10/29/2014 at 1:26 PM

Re: “Vote McLaughlin, Beckles, Myrick, and Eduardo Martinez for Richmond City Council

Jeff,

We didn't have space in the paper to explain our position on 48. Basically, we don't object to the Native American casino pact negotiated by Gov. Brown. In general, we don't have a problem with off-reservation casinos. We also like the fact that the deal effectively protects a stretch of the Northern California coast from future development.

2 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Editor on 10/29/2014 at 11:51 AM

Re: “The Express’ 2014 Endorsements

Oakland Rising Action conducted a study of the candidates, their positions, actions and experience and ranked mayoral choices as 1) Siegel, 2) Quan and 3) Schaff. Siegel is the most progressive candidate and Quan, despite her missteps, has achieved a great deal. Schaff has become more progressive. Rebecca Kaplan is ineffective and inconsistent. Tuman has no relevant experience (he claims that being head of his academic department has prepared him to run the city of Oakland. As an academic, I find this laughable.) Bryan Parker is the big business candidate.

2 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Brad Erickson on 10/29/2014 at 11:16 AM

Re: “Vote McLaughlin, Beckles, Myrick, and Eduardo Martinez for Richmond City Council

Why Yes on 48? I'm curious to see the reasoning.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Jeff Johnson on 10/29/2014 at 10:35 AM

Re: “The Express’ 2014 Endorsements

East Bay Express has been generally supportive of the Oakland establishment so it is consistent in endorsing Schaaf, Quan, Kaplan (with a nod to establishment-associated Siegel) and Anne Washington. This is essentially a vote for no change and a continuation of past policies, progressive or not. I say "not."

Chip Johnson, on the other hand, has often been critical of Oakland policies and (mis)management. Thus it's surprising that he has decided to go for Schaaf with a nod to Quan.

My take on it all is that it's all about editorialists not wanting to take political risks, as limited as such risks may actually be for them. It's true that people like Quan don't tolerate opposition.

As well as a lack of direct knowledge on their part of the ins and outs of how local government actually "works" and exactly who benefits from the status quo.

1 like, 7 dislikes
Posted by Hobart Johnson on 10/29/2014 at 9:33 AM

Re: “The Express’ 2014 Endorsements

In Tuesday’s Chronicle, Chip Johnson reveled his three choices for Mayor, Libby first, Tuman second and, somewhat apologetically, Quan for third. Libby is my first and Tuman my second, and I was considering Quan for third, but not after receiving an email from her completely misrepresenting Chip’s endorsement. She made it sound as tho she was his first choice by saying he “gave his support to Mayor Jean Quan.” The paragraph following had words of praise for her, which were not his. She did not put quotes around them but the juxtaposition could lead one to believe they were his words. She seems desperate. I don’t feel this is a person I can trust to be truthful.

He did say her last two years were better than the first two. But his main point was “better the devil you know….”

Chip reported in detail on positions and actions Libby had taken that convinced him that she was the best choice. It is well worth reading, and I am not even a fan of him.

9 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Joyce Roy on 10/29/2014 at 12:08 AM

Re: “The Express’ Endorsements So Far

Very sorry to see your opposition to Prop 46. Prop 46 would raise the limit on non-economic (pain and suffering) damages in medical malpractice cases. The current limit - $250,000 - was set in 1975, and if it wasn't too low then, it's way too low now. Because lawyers fees are paid from these damages, the current limit makes it impossible for many malpractice victims to recover for their injuries. You are right that Prop 46's backers cynically added a requirement that doctors be drug-tested, to appeal to voters. But their cynicism is more than matched by that of the big insurers and institutions opposing the measure, who only attack "trial lawyers" and raise fears of increased medical costs, without acknowledging that the Proposition's purpose is to allow victims of medical malpractice to recover.

2 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Peter Clapp on 10/28/2014 at 9:57 AM

Re: “The Express' Endorsements So Far

In Ad15 there is a clear difference between the two candidates. Tony Thurmond has a record of finding solutions to problems and taking tough votes on issues he believes in. Tony was the deciding vote to keep heavy crude out of the Richmond refinery. He stopped Chevron from self permitting changes to the refinery and forced them to go through the normal planning process. These are not the kinds of actions that would endear him to "big oil". Even though Echols worked for the Green Building Council she does not have a record of how she would vote on tough issue to run on.

I support Tony Thurmond because I've seen the things he's accomplished on the Richmond City Council and on the West Contra Costa School Board. If you look at his record his stands have been consistent. There's no reason to believe he'll be different if elected to serve in Sacramento.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Vincent Casalaina on 10/17/2014 at 9:37 AM

Re: “The Express’ 2014 Endorsements So Far

This comment was removed because it violates our policy against anonymous comments. It will be reposted if the commenter chooses to use his or her real name.

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Editor on 10/01/2014 at 8:10 AM

Re: “The Express' Endorsements for the June 3 Primary

Do you only remove political signage from public medians and other people's private property or do you also remove say realtor's sandwich signs from median strips? Do you ask the property owners if they gave permission?

I hope you're non-partisan and remove Barbara Lee signage also. Don't forget the Mayor Quan sign at 51st and Telegraph.

Berkeley has the same sign ordinance as Oakland, but has chosen not to enforce it because it does not want to get sued for restriction of political free speech. Berekley does enforce the ban where the signs block scenic or safety views. They do levy hefty fines against any committee that fails to promptly remove the signs post election.

Political signs are one of the cheapest forms of getting election name recognition.

Oakland’s ordinance is a violation of political free speech that only serves to raise the entry barrier to people who challenge incumbents and fight against well financed propositions.

Oakland should adopt the policy of Berkeley and allow political signage on appropriate public areas but enforce the prompt removal after an election.

4 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Leonard Raphael on 05/24/2014 at 12:11 AM

Re: “The Express' Endorsements for the June 3 Primary

Steve Manning MAY be the best candidate for the office but he has hired someone who is flaunting the sign ordinances of Oakland, Fremont and who knows where else. I have personally taken down a few of his signs at intersections and on private property, freeway right of way etc. Where is the oversight for him, Bryan Parker (worst since his run for Oakland mayor is not til Nov). These folks blight our neighborhood and them complain about graffiti ? Please show some respect for those of us who work hard to beautify our neighborhoods.

Karen Hester, ScenicEastBay.org

2 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Karen Hester on 05/21/2014 at 3:37 PM

Re: “Vote Sbranti, Corbett, Honda, and Torlakson

"Now more than ever, we need political leaders who will stand up to Big Business and look out for the rights of workers, low-income residents, and our environment."

I couldn't have said it better myself.

4 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Doug Bloch on 05/21/2014 at 12:14 PM

Re: “Vote Sbranti, Corbett, Honda, and Torlakson

I'm glad to see this editorial. As I recall, the Express endorsed Prop. 14.

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Richardwinger on 05/21/2014 at 5:38 AM

Re: “Guillen, Quirk, and Wiener, and Yes on B, 28, and 29

This comment was removed because it violates our policy against anonymous comments. It will be reposted if the commenter chooses to use his or her real name.

1 like, 2 dislikes
Posted by Editor on 06/01/2012 at 2:28 PM

Re: “Guillen, Quirk, and Wiener, and Yes on B, 28, and 29

I have trouble understanding the characterization of Abel Guillen as the "more progressive" candidate than Rob Bonta. Bonta has been dual endorsed by many of the same organizations that Guillen claims support from, including the California League of Conservation Voters and SEIU. Bonta has by far the most endorsements from organized labor, and also the most Democratic Club endorsements of any candidate for Assembly District 18. Lastly, Bonta is exclusively endorsed by the United Farm Workers, one of the most progressive endorsements in the race. It seems that Bonta is the more consistent and proven progressive candidate.

1 like, 3 dislikes
Posted by James Reyes on 05/19/2012 at 12:53 PM

Re: “Guillen, Quirk, and Wiener, and Yes on B, 28, and 29

Apart from the genuine need for community college funds a $48.00 parcel tax is really unfair to a low income property owner, of whom there are many. Let's take on the big dog, prop 13, and modify it.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Kurt Schoeneman on 05/17/2012 at 12:22 PM

Re: “Yes on Measures I and H

Forgot one more part of this mail in election circus: the people at MOBN and the citizen's budget advisory committee who wrote the ballot argument in favor of J, made so errors in the original submittal, they went to court to get their own submittal changed. Then one of the mobn members has the chutzpah to say that the people who wrote the rebuttal against J could be sued for misstatements.

Posted by Leonard Raphael on 10/22/2011 at 5:22 PM

Re: “Yes on Measures I and H

@Leonard, Well said. I posted earlier this evening that I tried to go to the Measure Y website to see what was up and found it still says that Measure Y provides 63 more cops and brings the total to 803 cops. Unbelievable. Every little thing this city does is fucked up. Every little thing.

Posted by yoyo_guru on 10/22/2011 at 1:10 AM

Re: “Yes on Measures I and H

The ballot envelopes are badly laid out. There is so too much busy text and a confusion of font sizes and bad use of red color.

The all important "Failure to SIGN the declaration will invalidate your ballot" warning is useless because nothing to show you location of or label the "declaration".

A fitting ballot for a Rube Goldberg jerry rigged election from a Mayor and Council that rush from one crisis to crisis ineffectively.

Measure I where they lamely tried a nonbinding resolution to make the measure specify how money wb spent after they omitted that little piece from the ballot measure.

Or Measure J, where Libby S has stated publicly that there's a 5 year cap on the extension, but oops she forgot to put that in the Measure.

The desktop publishing manager responsible for approving this ballot envelope should be promoted to drafting misleading badly written ballot Measures for the City Council. They'd fit right in at a normal City Council meeting.

-len raphael

Vote Yes for Oakland

by VOTING NO ON H, I, J

Posted by Leonard Raphael on 10/22/2011 at 1:01 AM

Most Popular Stories


© 2016 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved
Powered by Foundation