Bumps in the Road

AC Transit pushes ahead on its Bus Rapid Transit project despite questionable benefits and potential problems for neighborhoods.

June 27, 2007

It's not yet rush hour on a breezy, sunny Wednesday afternoon, but the streets of International Boulevard in Oakland's Fruitvale district are already clogged. Moms pushing kids in strollers, folks getting off work, and men hawking ice cream from their carts fill the sidewalks, while cars, buses, and trucks jam roads trying to cross or get through the commercial district of this heavily populated area.

AC Transit
Fantasy: 98th Ave. and International Blvd.
Bayeté Ross-Smith
Reality: 51st St. and Telegraph Ave.
Article Tools

The traffic jam is exactly why AC Transit thinks its Bus Rapid Transit project will be a success. It's also exactly why many others think the plan is a disaster. That's because BRT calls for taking the two center lanes along some of the East Bay's busiest four-lane thoroughfares and making them bus-only. The bus line would run roughly seventeen miles along East 14th Street, International Boulevard, and Telegraph Avenue from San Leandro through Oakland, ending in downtown Berkeley, and would significantly affect neighborhoods along the route.

The project's main selling point is that riders would get around faster. Buses would arrive more often, stop farther apart, and interact with traffic signals to avoid having to slow down. To avoid fare-paying delays, riders would prepurchase tickets from kiosks located on station platforms in the middle of the road, and auditors would occasionally board buses to check for scofflaws. If approved by all three cities, BRT project manager Jim Cunradi says, the new system could break ground in 2009 and be complete by 2011.

Cunradi insists the changes will improve the experience for present-day riders and that it will boost ridership by 4,600 to 9,300 trips per weekday. But a recently released draft Environmental Impact Report suggests that the benefits may not be terribly significant, given the project's cost. And, with public comment on the draft report set to close on July 3, many residents of affected neighborhoods are unaware of the plan's specifics. (The report is available on AC Transit's Web site.)

Most East Bay residents support public transit, in spirit at least. But liberal ideals and harsh realities are likely to clash over the dedicated lanes, which are by far the most ambitious of the project's components. Besides traffic and parking issues, the time savings and environmental benefits detailed in the draft EIR are questionable, slim, and in some cases nonexistent.

Meanwhile, nearby homeowners who know of the plan's details fear what is probably inevitable: With car traffic down to one lane in each direction on Telegraph and International, drivers stuck at major intersections will seek shortcuts through residential streets.

AC Transit says it plans to mitigate congestion in intersections by adding lanes, adjusting signal timing, restriping, or possibly widening roads. There are at least four key intersections, however, where these impacts cannot be fixed: International Boulevard and High Street, High Street and San Leandro Boulevard, Alcatraz and Telegraph avenues, and Fulton Street and Bancroft Way. If the cities can live with the impacts, Cunradi says, the transit agency will forge ahead.

Roy Alper is a local developer and vice president of the business improvement district for Temescal, a neighborhood that could be profoundly affected. While his group supports Bus Rapid Transit, he says the draft EIR improperly analyzes key intersections, including those at the Rockridge/Temescal border where Claremont, Telegraph, and 51st Street converge. The report states that the intersections operate at a "generally acceptable" level of service.

Alper begs to differ. "The removal of two traffic lanes will create complete gridlock," he says. He believes the problem could be handled by making the bus lanes nonexclusive in those intersections.

But traffic along the entire route could worsen further if AC Transit keeps the existing bus lines, which stop about every two blocks, in the auto lanes. Another proposal is to combine the existing and new bus lines into one that uses the bus-only lanes but stops every one-third mile, rather than every half-mile, as currently proposed for the BRT line.

Vincent Casalaina, a TV producer and president of the Willard Neighborhood Association, speaking on his own behalf, concurs that AC Transit's data is unreliable. For instance, a traffic analysis that was only partially included in the draft EIR claimed drivers attempting to reach downtown Berkeley from Woolsey and Telegraph would turn left on Ashby and right on Shattuck. Casalaina counters that Parker Street is the obvious shortcut. "How can we believe the traffic analysis when we know on some level it's totally wrong?" he asks.

Dedicated lanes would also reduce parking: The plan for in-road station platforms would eliminate 945 to 1,300 street spaces. Cunradi claims the impact wouldn't be so bad since many of the spots in question often sit unoccupied. Not so in Temescal, one of Oakland's fastest-growing commercial districts, where parking already can be a challenge. Under one BRT option, the district would lose more than 65 percent of its metered parking along the business corridor. "We feel that's totally impractical under the circumstances, and they need to come up with replacement parking," Alper says. He means a parking lot. AC Transit's solution: Add time restrictions or plant meters along side streets.

Alper is also concerned that the study ignored the neighborhood's most-used crosswalks across Telegraph: those at 50th, 51st, and 45th streets. Instead, the wonks looked at 48th, 52nd, and 55th streets — which he calls a "pedestrian wasteland."

Alper's business group detailed its concerns in a letter to AC Transit prior to the draft Environmental Impact Report, but he says the concerns were "completely disregarded," despite the agency's assurances. "Temescal Telegraph Business Improvement District is strongly supportive of the Bus Rapid Transit system," he says. "We think it's a real plus for the city, the community, and for the environment. We just want it to be done right."

Full text

Read Comments

YOUR COMMENT


RECENT ARTICLES BY KATHLEEN RICHARDS

Who needs boyfriends when you can have sponsors? At one point, Eve had six of them.
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
The season brims with top-notch music festivals.
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Our critics recommend ten local music acts worth sweating for.
Wednesday, May 13, 2009

ARCHIVE SEARCH

Select One or More Criteria

NEWS BLOGS

THIS WEEK IN NEWS

Recession be damned, two Oakland entrepreneurs create 21st-century office space.
For years, East Bay activists have been trying to influence US policy toward North Korea. Finally, Washington may be listening.
Sources say the couple's financial troubles could rule out a reelection bid as the mayor is forced to return to lobbying.
Readers sound off on cuts to community colleges, the lost runner, and EBMUD.
The Alameda Boys and Girls Club seeks public funding for its new center, to the consternation of people who say that's not what a 2008 parks bond was for.
New Oakland bar creates a theme out of a term — geisha — that some area residents find offensive.
Lawsuit regarding Oakland's ranked-choice voting.
His prescription for an irritated but inactive people.
Up to ten young men laughed and snapped photos as they allegedly gang-raped a fifteen-year-old girl outside a Richmond High dance. And passersby did nothing to stop it.

MOST POPULAR NEWS STORIES

VIEWED E-MAILED COMMENTED
For years, East Bay activists have been trying to influence US policy toward North Korea. Finally, Washington may be listening.
The high-profile rape charges against Deputy District Attorney Michael Gressett are tainted by questionable facts, unorthodox prosecutorial conduct, and the unmistakable whiff of politics.
Local business owners say Yelp offers to hide negative customer reviews of their businesses on its web site ... for a price.
Berkeley High embraced the small schools movement to close its staggering racial achievement gap. But evidence suggests that these schools are exacerbating the very problem they were supposed to solve.
New Oakland bar creates a theme out of a term — geisha — that some area residents find offensive.

THIS WEEK'S FEATURE


When Chinese scholars arrive at Cal, Christian ministers help them get settled. But church involvement may set the visitors up for trouble back home.

SPECIAL REPORTS

The definitive guide to the East Bay.
Scavenging, swapping, sharing, sponsoring, recycling, and garage sale-ing.
Out & About, Home & Garden, Food & Drink, and Summer Arts

RECENT ISSUES


Nov 4, 2009

Oct 28, 2009

Oct 21, 2009

Oct 14, 2009

Oct 7, 2009

Sep 30, 2009