Who's Killing the Plug-In Hybrid? 

The same state agency that drove the electric car off a cliff is now poised to wreck a new Berkeley company that triples the gas mileage of a Toyota Prius.

Daniel Sherwood and Paul Guzyk never dreamed they would be accused of harming the planet. After all, the primary goal of their Berkeley startup company, 3Prong Power, is to curb greenhouse gas emissions. They convert Toyota Prius hybrids into mostly electric vehicles that get 100 to 150 miles per gallon. But a powerful state agency is poised to put 3Prong Power out of business and deal a severe blow to a promising new industry.

Next week, the California Air Resources Board is expected to adopt strict new regulations based on the theory that the innovative technology sold by 3Prong Power and other companies may be bad for the environment. Sherwood and Guzyk say that if the board adopts the new rules at its January 22 and 23 meeting, it likely will force them to shutter their business, which just had its grand opening last month at Green Motors on San Pablo Avenue.

In addition, proponents of the nascent plug-in hybrid industry say the air resources board also may snuff out a key component of what environmentalists believe will be the next generation of eco-friendly cars, thereby hampering our ability to wean ourselves from foreign oil, avoid petroleum wars in the Middle East, and slow the potentially devastating effects of global warming. "It's simply too early for government regulation of plug-in hybrids," said Felix Kramer, a leader of CalCars.org, a Palo Alto-based nonprofit that has led the fight for plug-in vehicles. "Acting too soon will shut off innovation and will kill companies that are just getting started."

Air resources board employees say the new regulations are not designed to squelch technological breakthroughs or bankrupt new businesses. They say they are merely trying to protect consumers' rights and ensure that the new technology doesn't roll back their attempts to limit cancer-causing emissions. After all, the board's main function is to regulate smog — not greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.

Indeed, the story of the board's attempt to regulate plug-in hybrids has turned out to be a battle between an agency whose primary mission is to protect Californians from breathing unhealthy air and a group of environmentalists and engineers who are fighting to slow global warming. The new proposed rules also appear to contradict the board's own recent attempts to curtail greenhouse gas emissions in the wake of a groundbreaking global warming law signed by the governor in 2006.

And even though the air resources board appears to have some valid concerns about plug-in-hybrid technology, to date it has acted more like an uncompromising bureaucratic agency than a trendsetter committed to saving the earth. In fact, it represents a classic case of not being able to see the forest for the trees.


3Prong Power and similar small companies that have cropped up around California over the past year are threatened by two sets of new regulations proposed by the staff of the air resources agency, also known as CARB. First, the board's staff wants to force the new startups to put their technology through a series of rigorous and expensive smog tests that could cost between $20,000 and $125,000, depending on how many cars the agency decides must be examined. The board's staff also wants to require the new companies to provide consumers with warranties for the changes they make to hybrids for up to ten years or 150,000 miles.

But the tests are too costly for the typical small startup to afford and the warranties are unattainable because the electric batteries currently used to power plug-ins don't last ten years. "For California to be on the cutting edge of green-tech, they need to be more of an enabler than a restrictor," Guzyk said. "For us, the new regulations, especially the warranty, are a deal breaker."

3Prong Power and its competitors transform Priuses into plug-in vehicles by putting a large flat battery in the trunk. The battery can be recharged by plugging the car into any electrical socket and allows the Prius to run entirely on electricity for speeds up to 34 miles per hour. Going faster than that triggers the car's gasoline-powered engine, transforming the vehicle back into a traditional hybrid. The conversion can double or even triple fuel economy, thereby severely limiting carbon dioxide emissions. CO2 from cars does not contribute to smog and is not harmful to human health but it is one of the leading contributors to global warming.

State Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner of Berkeley, an environmentalist and a Prius owner, said she understands the air resources board's concerns about smog. But she believes the agency needs to balance the regulation of smog and of greenhouse gases and should attempt to reach a compromise that will keep 3Prong Power and other small startups from going belly up. "I'm hopeful that CARB will meet with the companies and really try to partner with them," said Skinner, who attended 3Prong Power's grand opening in December and wants to convert her Prius to a plug-in. "These are small companies. They are innovators. There must be a way to share the burden."

Comments (15) RSS

Showing 1-5 of 15

Add a comment | All comments »

Does California have an Attorney General? - I mean to investigate bribe-taking officials on the Air Resources Board.

Posted by pachai on January 14, 2009 at 7:10 AM | Report this comment

Nancy, I hope that you can use your influence on CARB to prevent the same fiasco that befell the electric car. I've been driving and all-electric car for the past 7 years, but at this point there is no support infrastructure at all for EVs, thanks mostly to CARB's refusal to uphold the legislature's intent for ZEV's, which started way back in 1990. There is no justification for such rigid and uncompromizing rules, which only stifle innovation and provide little actual consumer protection. Plug-in hybrid customers know what they are doing - we are adults, we don't need the state to mandate a 10-year warranty or require completely unnecessary testing.

And I support 3 Prong also because they advocate using renewable PV power to fuel these plug-in hybrids, which reduces CO2 emissions even further!

Gary Gerber, President
Sun Light & Power Company, Berkeley

Posted by GaryTGerber on January 14, 2009 at 8:22 PM | Report this comment

CARB is populated with certifiable idiots. Look what they have done to diesel cars. They are bthe epitome of the loathsome, ignorant, regulators California seems to spawn like flies on excrement. Short sighted bastards, too!

Posted by old farmer on January 14, 2009 at 9:28 PM | Report this comment

How can citizens send comments to the Air Resources Board about this? Now is the time to make our voices heard. We as individuals and as a state need to support people and organizations who are working hard to get us off petroleum.

Posted by Charanga on January 15, 2009 at 7:58 PM | Report this comment

By Ron Gremban, CalCars Technical Lead: This is a great article!

It did seem to imply that all plug-in hybrids (PHEVs), or maybe just all conversions, are limited to 34 mph and modest acceleration without the engine, which is not true; converters have even managed to drive Prius conversions electrically to 52 mph despite Toyota's limiting software.

I believe that CARB wrote their proposed rules as if the PHEV conversion industry is a huge, mature industry like auto manufacturing, which has a billion-dollar cost of entry and 5 year development cycles. In contrast, all conversion manufacturers, except Hymotion once it was bought by A123, are entrepreneurial, funded largely by sales of evolving, often one-of-a-kind conversions.

The proposed CARB rules would require all design, testing, and certification efforts to be done up front before selling any conversions. Because this conversion industry is so embryonic, the market hasn't been established and suppliers -- especially smaller battery manufacturers without the cash to compete for auto manufacturer contracts -- have no real-world automotive experience with their components for which CARB would require proof of longevity. This means sufficient venture capital is hard to come by, so innovators must for now remain largely self-funded, making cost of entry prohibitive with such rules.

As mentioned in the article, the rules would (for good reasons, but with draconian results) require converters to include SULEV-level warranties. Worse (and not mentioned), for vehicles 6 years old or newer at the time of conversion, conversion would reset the vehicle's mileage and date of manufacture back to zero for the warranty!

One more thing, Onboard Diagnostics (OBD), required of all vehicle manufacturers, would be required to be fully understood, modified as necessary, and extended by a converter. The problem is that OBD internals, including the information needed to be sure to avoid lessening the effectiveness of the OEM OBD, appears to be proprietary data not available to anyone but the original manufacturer and government entities.

For more specifics related to the original CARB proposed rules -- though not the minor modifications that came as later amendments, please see my August 2008 formal comments to CARB at http://www.calcars.org/calcars-news/977.html .

Posted by Ron at CalCars on January 16, 2009 at 5:32 PM | Report this comment

Latest in Feature

  • A Coach's Job Begins Off the Court

    Coach Joanne Boyle has built the Cal women's basketball program by treating team members as people as well as players.
    • Nov 18, 2009
  • Das Mann of Steel

    How a metalworker from Burning Man became the maestro of the huge American Steel artist complex.
    • Nov 11, 2009
  • Understanding North Korea

    For years, East Bay activists have been trying to influence US policy toward North Korea. Finally, Washington may be listening.
    • Nov 4, 2009
  • More»

Author Archives

  • The Broken Promise

    It's official; California no longer offers an affordable college education. Plus, a new casino moves forward in Richmond and alleged torturer loses BART contract.
    • Nov 18, 2009
  • Rodney King Redux?

    A judge moves the murder trial of an ex-BART cop, but there's a chance it could lead to a repeat of the infamous LA case.
    • Oct 21, 2009
  • More»

Calendar

Submit an event

Most Popular Stories

  • You Don't Know Jack

    There's strong evidence that Marcel Diallo Jack, the self-styled "mayor of West Oakland," perpetrated a racist Internet fraud on a local activist.
  • Yelp and the Business of Extortion 2.0

    Local business owners say Yelp offers to hide negative customer reviews of their businesses on its web site ... for a price.
  • A Coach's Job Begins Off the Court

    Coach Joanne Boyle has built the Cal women's basketball program by treating team members as people as well as players.
  • A Troubled Rape Case

    The high-profile rape charges against Deputy District Attorney Michael Gressett are tainted by questionable facts, unorthodox prosecutorial conduct, and the unmistakable whiff of politics.
  • A Small Town's Sweet Sorrow

    The tight bond between Crockett and C&H sugar has been polluted along with local waterways.

© 2009 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved