UC Berkeley Athletes Cramped Up 

As a court battle rages over the university's proposed new training facility, Cal's less-visible athletes share a taste of their daily travails.

Shellie Onstead, the California Golden Bears women's field hockey coach, was anxiously watching the Cal football team defend its second-quarter lead over the Tennessee Volunteers when she got a text message: Legendary ABC Sports announcer Brent Musburger had just mentioned her team on national television.

The sideline reporter at the September 1 home opener was interviewing a top Cal official about the cramped training facilities for student-athletes, and the university's fight with the city of Berkeley over plans for a new building. Musburger said he had experienced the tight quarters firsthand. "The women's field hockey team kicked me out of a meeting the other day," he told his national audience from the booth. "They needed some place to get their act together."

UC Berkeley is locked in a legal battle with the city, the California Oaks Foundation, and the Panoramic Hill Association, a neighborhood group, over plans to renovate the 84-year-old Memorial Stadium and build a $125 million high-performance athletic center. A trial to determine the fate of the latter began on September 19 in Alameda County Superior Court. Among the key issues are earthquake safety and environmental concerns, and critics also often cast the training facility as a multimillion-dollar spending spree for the school's football program.

But the university says the true beneficiaries will be a baker's dozen of other Cal athletic programs — from field hockey to lacrosse — that never make the national spotlight. At one of the nation's top public universities, scores of student-athletes are compelled to use their cars as locker rooms, compete for medical attention, and undress in full view of athletes of the opposite sex. "When our practice coincides with football, it's like a well-choreographed ballet in the training room," Onstead says. She later adds: "Brent Musburger was prompted to comment about our facilities on TV after experiencing what we have to go through every single day."

At the proposed training center, each of the thirteen teams would have its own locker room space. They would also have a shared dining area and top-notch medical facilities — capable of performing X-rays, MRIs, and blood tests — plus on-site nutritionists and sports psychologists.

It's not the amenities that trouble the opposition, but the training center's proposed location next to the Hayward Fault, which geologists consider to be the Bay Area fault most likely to experience a major earthquake in the next thirty years. Construction would also require the removal of 42 trees in the oak grove west of the stadium, where tree-sitting protesters and university police have created a national, Berkeley-style sideshow. "The majority of our group would say that we support Cal athletes — all the teams should have state-of-the-art facilities,'' said Jerry Wachtel, president of the Panoramic Hill Association, which represents the upscale neighborhood overlooking the stadium. "There are many places where they could build the athletic center."

The current medical and training facility under the northwest section of Memorial Stadium's bleachers was designed to accommodate one hundred student athletes. Today, an estimated 350 rely on the archaic setup for weight training, physical therapy, medical exams, and team meetings. As a result, Cal ranks dead last in the Pac-10 in strength and conditioning space provided to its athletes — it has just over ten square feet per person, roughly a third of the space available to the average Pac-10 athlete.

Most of the teams using the stadium don't have access to a locker room. For Onstead's field hockey team, that means changing at home, in their cars, or in a cramped women's bathroom next to the training room.

Women's lacrosse uses the visiting football team's locker room most of year, but is forced to pack up and leave on Fridays before home football games. According to head coach Theresa Sherry, the locker room is putrid. "None of the girls even shower in there," she says. "It's disgusting. They have one or two shower heads and it doesn't even get hot."

Without their own facilities, female athletes often have to undress in front of male football or rugby players to get their injuries explored and wrapped in the training room. "If you have a groin injury, you could be very exposed in front of the football players," says Danni Zuralow, a senior lacrosse player. "If you need to get wrapped, you are in your underwear. It can be really awkward. Some girls go to the bathroom to get wrapped, or go into a corner."

The plan's critics are not only sympathetic, Wachtel says, but many are also Cal boosters, faculty, and alumni.

Some of them have suggested the center be built next to Edwards Stadium, the track and soccer facility on Bancroft Avenue, a half-mile downhill from Memorial Stadium. The teams don't much like that idea, though. Rachel "Rocky" Moffitt, a junior field hockey player, opines that it's unreasonable to expect an injured athlete to walk fifteen minutes to get wrapped or iced. "You wouldn't know what it's like unless you'd trained and practiced up here," she says. "You'd have to experience it yourself."

Wachtel also suggests that the football team could play home games off-campus at Oakland's McAfee Coliseum, much as UCLA uses the Rose Bowl in Pasadena. But such a plan is likely to create a huge uproar among students and alumni, who treasure the vibe of having their stadium close at hand.

The players on Cal's lesser-known teams certainly want the proposed center to stay put. "As a senior I've experienced a lot of things," Zuralow says. "We deserve this. We put all of our passion, all of our heart into this. We should have a facility that accommodates us."

Comments (6) RSS

Showing 1-5 of 6

Add a comment | All comments »

So Jerry Wachtel, you say you support Cal athletics but want to destroy it at the same time. The Panoramic Hill Association should have their picture taken under "NIMBY" in the dictionary.

Posted by eddage9230 on September 27, 2007 at 8:16 AM | Report this comment

Sure, the PHA supports Cal athletics, just not the athletes themselves. They'd rather have women changing in cars and parking lots and walking half a mile up hill to/from games than gain the equal facilities they've earned and deserve. Make no mistake, the PHA would like nothing more than the complete removal of football facilities from it's long-held location near the homes the PHA members (most likely purchased well after the stadium was constructed). They will punish the beneficiaries of the football program, i.e., female athletes, non-football athletes, and football players, to get their way. They don't care! But it's funny when they try to justify their position--their indifference shines through their lies and half-truths. Jerry Wachtel must think readers of this paper are fools.

Posted by mayo_johndb98 on September 27, 2007 at 8:33 AM | Report this comment

Those bastards and hippie treetards just want to no sport, no athelete, they do not care for any of the athelete, or the school at all. Go to hell

Posted by hth_99996ee on September 27, 2007 at 8:44 AM | Report this comment

I appreciate a well-written news story and this was no exception. Paul Gackle is a welcome addition to the East Bay Express. I'm looking forward to reading more of his work and I wish those athlestes affected by this issue the best of luck.

Posted by vestal_kccf51 on September 27, 2007 at 1:40 PM | Report this comment

Opposition to the training center by the city of Berkeley etc. has increased the amount of time hundreds of athletes must remain in seismically unsafe Memorial Stadium. The University has proven the proposed structure does not reside on the fault (within 50 feet) which is the only substantive claim made by opponents of the facility. Ongoing court litigation regards the EIR (Environmental Impact Report) with opponents attempting to force a re-write and are attempting to claim the proposed facility is an addition to Memorial, not a seperate structure. Opponents hope this baseless claim sticks because it will cause the seismic retrofitting of Memorial (which can only be upto 50% of the value of the structure) much more difficult as the price of the training center will be included. It must be clearly understood by the public the safety of the university's student-athlete's is not the concern of the City, homeowners above the stadium, and tree people. The court actions cannot stop the university from building this structure, only delay it. Should an earthquake hit and the hundreds of men and women who otherwise would have been ensconed in seismically safe facilities be harmed, their blood will be on the head's of Tom Bates, the Berkeley city council, Panoramic Hill Association members and those living in the oak grove adjacent to the stadium.

Posted by kvnreimersf7ca on October 5, 2007 at 10:23 AM | Report this comment

Latest in News

Calendar

Submit an event

Most Popular Stories

  • You Don't Know Jack

    There's strong evidence that Marcel Diallo Jack, the self-styled "mayor of West Oakland," perpetrated a racist Internet fraud on a local activist.
  • Yelp and the Business of Extortion 2.0

    Local business owners say Yelp offers to hide negative customer reviews of their businesses on its web site ... for a price.
  • A Coach's Job Begins Off the Court

    Coach Joanne Boyle has built the Cal women's basketball program by treating team members as people as well as players.
  • I am Annoyed and Disappointed

    Café Gratitude espouses a raw food diet and a philosophy of self-transformation. But some current and former employees say it's left a bad taste in their mouths.
  • Understanding North Korea

    For years, East Bay activists have been trying to influence US policy toward North Korea. Finally, Washington may be listening.

© 2009 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved