Privatizing the Parks? 

Facing budget cuts, Oakland's Office of Parks and Recreation enlists a private company to help with upkeep at Mosswood Park. Some residents are none too pleased.

When Mosswood Park opened its community garden about a year ago, residents hoped it would be a boon to the neighborhood, providing space to grow fresh fruits and vegetables and educational activities for local teens instead of the drug dealing that had become rampant in the area. About six of the fifteen garden boxes were reserved for teen gardening, and a teen center adjacent to the garden was renovated. However, months after the garden's inauguration, the teen garden boxes never materialized, and many of the plants had become overgrown or were dying.

But when Oakland's Office of Parks and Recreation allowed a for-profit local company called Kijiji Grows to set up an aquaponics system in the garden and start teaching classes to teens, residents were outraged. "We ... should demand a reasonable public process for gifting park land to non-profits (or for profits ...)," wrote one resident on a community e-mail list. "What the heck is going on here? As I understand it, a for-profit business has broken into to a hard-won community garden," said another. "It is a serious drag that it now takes constant vigilance to keep the City of Oakland from actively doing you dirt."

The company's co-owners, Keba Konte and Eric Mandu, say they hope their presence will contribute to the community. "We're not selling any technology, we're absolutely not selling produce," said Konte, who's also the owner of Guerilla Cafe in Berkeley. "As a company, what was in it for us was that we would be able to demonstrate what this technology does." The East Bay company sells aquaponics gardening systems, in which a pipe cycles water between a fish tank and a garden box, allowing the plants to be fertilized by the fish waste and the roots of the plants to filter fresh water back to the fish. In the past, Kijiji Grows has collaborated with the nonprofit Mo' Better Foods and this year's Malcolm X Jazz Festival, where they taught kids about aquaponics.

Konte had approached Oakland's Office of Parks and Recreation earlier this summer, suggesting that they collaborate. The cash-starved parks department saw it as a way to keep its garden clean and to provide programs at its teen center for free. Audree Jones-Taylor, director of Oakland Parks and Recreation, told a group of residents at a community meeting in mid-September that to fill the many needs of the parks "we are leveraging services left and right."

But some residents feel that Kijiji Grows is getting a free pass. Typically, aspiring gardeners have to submit an application and $25 fee to reserve a garden box, and other users of the park also have to pay rent, such as a Jazzercize class and the nonprofit elementary school Bridgemount Academy, which uses three rooms in the rec center to hold classes. However, the parks department admitted that it's not requiring Kijiji to pay rent, nor did they sign an official agreement with the company outlining the terms of their tenancy.

Residents also weren't told about Kijiji's tenancy. In fact, community gardeners only found out about the company's plans in late July, when they discovered changes in the setup of their area: Junk that was usually stored in the dilapidated teen center adjacent to the garden had been moved to the garden itself; a lock on one of the gates had been broken off; a hole was drilled in the wall of the teen center and an extension cord was threaded through, leading to a garden plot with running water and a fish tank attached. The company, meanwhile, says the lock was removed to make the garden more accessible. "Right now, there's about four people who have the combination to the gate and they come in and water their garden and they leave," Konte said. His main motivation, he said, was to make the community garden, "a lot more accessible than what it is."

That attitude seemed cavalier to some and heroic to others. In an e-mail, Seth Katz, a community member who cleaned up a section of the park to create a dog run a few years ago, was frustrated that, although he and others had wrestled with bureaucracy to improve certain sections of the park, "Kijiji Grows shows up and, they build something without permits, ... steal power and water, and wire illegally, and they are still there today." But elementary school teacher Casie Lopez saw Kijiji as the only means to filling the most essential responsibility of the park — keeping the local kids learning instead of turning to drugs and criminal activity. "I'm not gonna stop working until this center is solvent," she asserted at a recent community meeting. While the classes Kijiji Grows had intended to teach at Mosswood to teenagers have been on hold during the controversy, many community members expressed their gratitude to the aquaponics company for the pilot class they taught over the summer, and for the sheer beauty of their produce.

The tensions found in the Mosswood community aren't unique, but they reflect a greater issue: how city agencies are coping with severe budget cuts. According to Jones-Taylor, the the Office of Parks and Recreation's budget had been cut by $12 million from five years ago. Until mid-July, Oakland's community gardens were running smoothly under garden coordinator Josh Amaris. When he left in midsummer, the parks department took three months to hire his replacement, Harith Aleem. Many of the Mosswood community members said they felt the department found it more cost effective to eliminate that position indefinitly, had it not been for the rancor caused by the miscommunicaton in Mosswood's garden. The lack of leadership during those three months was felt in other community gardens in Oakland as well. Jean Robertson, volunteer coordinator of Golden Gate Community Garden in Oakland, complained of "eons of Bermuda grass" that used to get cleared away. With the absence of a garden coordinator, the gardens were slipping into disarray, especially as residents were dealing with their own financial challenges. At the September community meeting at Mosswood Park, Jones-Taylor told an upset group of gardeners that she clearly needed to fill the position faster than she thought.

For the parks department, bringing in private companies may be one of the ways to save local parks. So is this a slow privitization of the parks, as some community members contend, or a creative solution that lifts up local entrepreneurship? Jones-Taylor made the decision to keep Kijiji Grows in Mosswood, although she admitted that their presence would have to stay small since they stepped on so many toes initially. "I think their model is great," she said after the September community meeting. "This is not the best spot for it, but parks are blighted." As for the community of people who still oppose the presence of Kijiji Grows, Jones-Taylor was confident that the aquaponics group would impress people with their work in the community and with the beauty of their organic produce. "They'll see," she said.

Comments (6) RSS

Showing 1-5 of 6

Add a comment | All comments »

Only in Oakland would it be considered anything less than a scandal to find out
that the Parks and Recreation department allows private businesses to operate
on public land without a contract specifying liability and precisely what it is the
city gets from the use of public land. Only in Oakland would the lack of process
and permits or even a clear plan for the use of the land persist after it has been
exposed in public meetings, in wide-ranging email messages, and in the press.
The, in my opinion, institutional dysfunction that fosters these situations
and in which there are no consequences for flagrant violation of good
practice has not served Oakland well.

Reco Bembry of OPR told me at the meeting mentioned in the article that he
believes Kijiji Grows intends to sell hydroponic systems. Other hydroponics
companies in the East Bay rent stores and pay their own way. Kijiji has told a
number of people that it is a "non-profit" although no such paperwork has been
filed, to my knowledge. What liability are the citizens of Oakland carrying for
a private hydroponics company and other businesses in Mosswood Park? What
cost is associated with these businesses in power, water, upkeep, and resources?
I'm not saying it can't be a good deal. I'm saying there is no public transparency
and to my knowledge no contracts.

The arrogance and miscommunication on the parts of Kijiji Grows and OPR,
and the lack of a garden coordinator at OPR have undermined what could
have been a successful process to reclaim an unused portion of Mosswood Park.
Instead, you can go by any day and see the mounds of garbage bags
and piles of lumber they have left against the fence and the empty raised
beds of discouraged gardeners. One of the major themes of the meeting about
which this article reports was that OPR has been, by and large, unresponsive
to email and to established neighborhood groups around Mosswood Park.
At the meeting, Audree Jones-Taylor presented an impassioned defense of
the lack of adherence to printed rules by the one group to which they must respond, the Mosswood Advisory Board.

Oakland Parks and Recreation needs true volunteers like the ones who
built the garden or those who are trying to work with OPR to build projects and
get grants in parks throughout Oakland in order to revitalize our parks and
widen their use at a time when the OPR budget has been slashed. I encourage
OPR to support those efforts and to spend the time to court neighborhood
groups, not ignore them, so that our parks will improve and better serve
those who use them. We have seen a revolution in parks renovation in Oakland,
largely fueled by local volunteers, in the last decade. We don't want to go back to
the dangerous, run down, crime-ridden parks we had ten years ago because OPR wants
to do the easy thing and not the right thing. Speaking as someone who spent
many years working to improve Mosswood Park, I do not feel OPR appreciates the value volunteers put into the parks and do not respect their efforts. Our parks are for those who live here, not those who can
most successfully sweet talk our city officials
or to promote special interests over serving the neighborhood.
As our new police chief recently told Councilmember Jane Brunner,
"I believe that all public entities exist to bring value to the residents
which they serve, in the way that the residents expect".

My opinion,

Seth Katz

Posted by kasakatz on October 18, 2009 at 11:10 AM | Report this comment

Aside from being factually incorrect about the teen center renovation at Mosswood Park (plans for significant structural improvements funded more than two years ago remain "in process" ) the Express article was a reasonable introduction to some of the problems currently facing Oakland Parks and Rec. The reporter's interest was clearly the question of whether public/private partnerships in the parks are a good idea. However, the fact that Ms. Geuss either completely missed - or chose not to dilute her story with - the underlying communication and accountability issues that were the very reason Mosswood neighbors insisted on the 9/23/09 meeting with OPR officials is remarkable. It might be of use for all parties to revisit a 1998 Express article for background on some of the underlying concerns still at issue in the Mosswood Park community. Any assistance The Express can provide in making that article available would be greatly appreciated.

AJ Benham

Posted by alicejeanius on October 18, 2009 at 12:06 PM | Report this comment

To be fair, there is a large and important difference between "privatizing" the parks and letting them be used by small, locally owned companies like Kijiji Grows. They aren't Home Depot. We need to draw that distinction a lot more rigorously.

Posted by Shoshone on October 19, 2009 at 12:51 PM | Report this comment

It's amazing how people with too much time on their hands, who claim to represent the community can cast despair on a situation or demean well intended efforts, for the sake of gaining an audience. In the big picture, it's going to take a collaborative effort between the City, the community, private entities and nonprofit organizations to achieve the kind of change that Oakland deserves. While the process may not be perfect, the idea of teaching teens sustainable growth techniques and exposing them to community based businesses has infinitely more value than standing on the sideline with misinformation or limited information and taking pot shots. It's much harder to build something than it is to tear it down. Anybody who has built something understands that; anybody who hasn't does not. Work to make an imperfect system better or we'll never have anything.

Posted by RBA on October 21, 2009 at 2:08 PM | Report this comment

If I might respond to "RBA", who unfortunately did not put his or her name on his or her comments, I assume you are not responding to my comments.

It is not a sign of "too much time on their hands" to care about one's neighborhood park and unresponsive city government. You probably aren't talking about me with your comment about, "standing on the sidelines", either, given that I have been very much involved in Mosswood Park for the last ten years, taking a central role in building a dog run facility and upgrading all of the park's water fountains, and sitting on the Redevelopment board which approved the teen center and tot lot grants. I was Mosswood's park steward for a while there, too, and have worked numerous volunteer days, among other activities. I have built in that park (with no financial gain for myself) and I don't want to see what I and others have built ruined.

And who are you and what have you done, besides posting an anonymous, mean spirited, and partisan note?

Posted by kasakatz on October 22, 2009 at 8:55 AM | Report this comment

Latest in News

Calendar

Submit an event

Most Popular Stories

© 2009 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved