Eli's Experiment 

Meet Eli Broad, a SoCal billionaire who uses his cash and connections to groom Oakland school administrators and keep the district under state control.

Vince Matthews needed to rehabilitate his reputation. He had quit his post as an Oakland school principal after just a few months on the job, and a for-profit charter school he ran in San Francisco nearly lost its license after allegations of discrimination. With that kind of résumé, Matthews had little chance of ever fulfilling his dream of becoming a school district superintendent. That is, until he enrolled in the Broad Academy.

Indeed, Matthews was passed over for a midlevel management job with Oakland Unified not long ago due to lack of qualifications. But now he's pocketing $240,000 a year as the new interim state administrator of the district, one of the largest in California. He follows in the footsteps of two previous Broad graduates — Randy Ward and Kim Statham. And like his predecessors, Matthews now oversees more than one hundred schools and nearly forty thousand children with all the powers of both a superintendent and an elected school board.

The architect behind Matthews' sudden turnaround appears to have been Eli Broad — pronounced like road — a retired suburban homebuilder and life insurance magnate. With assets valued at $5.8 billion, Broad is the 42nd richest person on the planet, according to the September 19 issue of Forbes. Over the past seven years, he has quietly used his financial muscle to remake himself as an education reformer and political power broker who wields considerable clout with school districts around the state, particularly Oakland Unified.

An ardent charter-school supporter, Broad built his influence through his close ties with state Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell, who also happens to be Vince Matthews' boss. O'Connell, in fact, owes Broad a debt of gratitude. According to campaign finance records on file with the secretary of state, Broad helped O'Connell capture the state superintendent's office in 2002 by cutting a check for $100,000, which put him among the campaign's top donors.

The billionaire's juice with California's highest ranked educator, in turn, has allowed him to operate what amounts to his own educational experiment behind the scenes in Oakland.

Broad believes the best way to fix troubled urban school districts is to employ the classic American business model in which a powerful chief executive runs roughshod over a weak governing board. Oakland, under state control, has provided the perfect laboratory. Since the state takeover in 2003, Broad has donated $6 million to the Oakland schools, and the district has been led solely by graduates of his leadership training academy. During that period, nine other Broad associates also have held high-level positions in the district.

Public records also show that Broad has helped finance an expensive lobbying campaign to prevent the return of local control to Oakland schools. He has donated more than $350,000 to EdVoice, a Sacramento nonprofit upon whose board he has served. EdVoice has lobbied heavily in recent months against AB45, a bill by Oakland Assemblyman Sandré Swanson that would gradually return powers to the Oakland school board.

Sources familiar with the situation say Broad fears the Oakland school board would replace Matthews with a non-Broad-graduate were it to regain its authority, thereby ending his experiment and possibly jettisoning the reform efforts he financed and helped engineer. "It's all about protecting his investment," one knowledgeable source says, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the power Broad and O'Connell wield in California public education.

Broad's investment appears safe for now. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has until October 14 to either veto or sign AB45 into law, but it would be a major surprise if the bill gets past his desk. Broad, after all, ranks among Schwarzenegger's top campaign contributors since 2004. He has donated at least $710,000 to the governor and causes dear to his heart.

Broad isn't necessarily a bad guy. His critics and supporters both think he means well for the city's schoolchildren and for education in general, but his hefty campaign donations and close ties to some of California's most powerful men have essentially given his unelected private enterprise power over the Oakland schools. Which raises this question: What happens when his all-powerful CEOs are not up to the job?


Eli Broad has no qualms about using his wealth to stir up controversy and sway political campaigns. He has done it repeatedly in Southern California, where, in the 2000, 2002, and 2004 elections, he tried to defeat school board candidates who did not support his friend Alan Bersin, who was then superintendent of San Diego Unified. Bersin, who also believes in the corporate model as a way to turn around foundering school districts, had partnered with the Broad Center and hired several of its graduates.

Known as a control freak's control freak, the 74-year-old Broad has no patience for activist school boards. Prior to 2004, he already had spent nearly $5 million on Bersin's reforms, but by then, parents and teachers were leading a backlash against him. He responded by pumping $65,000 into school board campaigns intended to defeat Bersin detractors. But this time, money was not enough. "I was running hard against him and all these outside folks who had so much influence over our schools," recalled board member Mitz Lee, who trounced her Broad-backed competition. "People realized that he was trying to buy the election of the board. Then, once I was elected, the first thing we did was not renew his project in San Diego."

Several months later, Bersin followed Broad out of town to replace another of the billionaire's friends, Richard Riordan, as Schwarzenegger's education secretary.

Born in the Bronx and raised in Detroit, Broad seems an unlikely education reformer. He was a self-described "goof-off" in high school, who, in his early twenties, took a $25,000 loan from his father-in-law and cofounded Kaufman and Broad, which built and sold cheap tract homes in Detroit's burgeoning suburbs. In the early 1960s, he moved his company to Los Angeles — ground zero of suburban sprawl. He later renamed it KB Home and grew it into one of the largest homebuilders in the nation.

KB Home was just the first of two businesses that Broad built into a Fortune 500 powerhouse. In the early 1970s, he bought Sun Life Insurance Company of America, and in less than two decades, transformed it into one of the country's largest annuity companies. Along the way he renamed it SunAmerica, which he sold to American International Group (better known as AIG) in 1999 for $18 billion.

Before his foray into education, Broad also made a name for himself as a mover and shaker in Los Angeles. His philanthropic ventures have funded the arts and medical research, and earlier this year, he even tried to buy one of the city's leading institutions, The Los Angeles Times, along with friend and fellow billionaire Ron Burkle.

Comments (5) RSS

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Broad is dead-on 100 percent correct on one thing: the utter uselessness of school boards. School boards are usually dominated by know nothings there only to advance their own political agendas or help push materials sold by their slimy associates. Sometimes too much democracy and participation is a bad thing. Turning over control of major decisions to school districts is a common recipe for disaster. Instead, districts should be run by hired gun education professionals subject to reward and termination at anytime. Oakland did not have the guts to dismiss the clueless Dennis Chaconas, a man who had no idea his district was nearly $100 million in debt. The state knew what to do. And the school district was impotent throughout the sorry situation.

Posted by Manuel DePiedra on October 11, 2007 at 6:49 PM | Report this comment

Manuel DePiedra, of course you're entitled to your opinion about school boards and the best way to run school districts. But one correction: The Oakland school district was never "nearly $100 million in debt." When the state fired Chaconas in June 2003, the district's debt stood at $57.3 million -- a huge number, to be sure, but not anywhere close to $100 million. In fact, the district, to this day, still has not touched more than $30 million of the original $100 million loan. Currently, its invested in an interest-bearing account.

Posted by robert.gammon on October 12, 2007 at 3:41 PM | Report this comment

While I really like this article, your tone suggests a negative agenda by the Billionaire. Maybe he sees that is life is nearing the fourth quarter and he wants to do some good. Perhaps he wants to go down in history as one of the good guys. The fact that he has to be very hands-on and controlling is that he realizes this is the same approach that worked so well for his business ventures. He's simply doing something in a manner which knows works(i.e. micromanagement and control). I wish the article could have been more balanced as it reads a little too "conspiracy theorist" for my taste.

Posted by tony5e06 on October 28, 2007 at 10:38 AM | Report this comment

Every time I hear the words Broad Foundation, red flags go up for me. This is a result of having followed California school reform for 15 years now, particularly the year-round school movement which was embraced by many developers like Mr. Eli Broad as a means of avoiding paying school impact fees when new homes are built. I was alarmed recently to hear words of praise by Duval County's (Florida) new interim Supt. Ed Pratt-Dannals about the Broad Foundation's education philosophy in his recent interview on a local PBS program. Two previous Duval superintendents were also Broad Foundation trained, as I suspect Pratt-Dannals is. Also, everyone of our local school board members has received training at the Broad Foundation, which the foundation paid for, I am told. Many Broad Foundation watchers around the country say the real purpose of this group is to diminish the power of school boards for an incremental and eventual takeover of public education by the corporate sector. There are concerns that Broad is carrying out the goals and education agenda of the Business Roundtable, made up of the CEOs of the nation's biggest companies, one of which Eli Broad headed. Those goals are less about providing children with a good education and more about turning schools into training institutions with job-related specifications dictated by the business sector. In otherwords, schools won't turn out broadly educated citizens capable of thinking for themselves, but narrowly educated and programmed corporate workerbees. More journalists need to take a closer look at the role of the Broad Foundation in education policy. Your story seems to establish a track record of failure by Broad associates placed in school districts to improve them. Certainly, we have at least two examples in our own school district. These repititious patterns of failure only serve to further undermine confidence in public education and set it up for a takeover by the private sector. I sometimes wonder if that is not the true underlying objective of the Broad Foundation approach. None other than Bill Gates and a Silicon Valley billionaire buddy of his is now funding a chain of private schools in which high school students pay for their tuition from salaries earned in jobs where they work a portion of the school week--part of their requirement for high school graduation. Such a set up is also a convenient means for providing a constant stream of low-wage workers for hard-to-fill, unrewarding, lowpaying deadend jobs with a constant turnover. How convenient it would be to tap a labor pool of 17 million high school students--an arrangement that would also have an impact of further suppressing American wages. There is a corporate agenda for education at work in this nation that is not healthy for children or this nation and the future of this nation. Billee Bussard bussardre@aol.com concerned citizen semi-retired journalist editor, www.SummerMatters.com

Posted by bussardre6d2c on October 30, 2007 at 6:48 AM | Report this comment

If anybody thinks this is doing any good for the children of Oakland, please look at this Gates Foundation report, from Diplomas Count 2007.

http://mapsg.edweek.org/edweekv2/ViewerController?cmd=getDistrictReport&MINX=-122.584814007554&MINY=37.7242114365304&MAXX=-121.974237992446&MAXY=38.0273545634696&districtId=628050¤tDistrictType=unified

The district has a 46% graduation rate, and 60% of the attrition occurs by 10th grade. The hucksters taking over low-income schools across the nation are "leveraging" their "donations" by cheating working class kids out of any education at all. The gap is widening, not closing, under their control. They are putting little girls out onto the street with less than a 10th grade education, and calling it success because they control the "accountability" system politically.

You can use the map tool from Education Week to explore Diplomas Count on your own. Here it is:

http://www.edweek.org/apps/maps/

Let it initialize on your machine, then click explore, and wait for the map to appear before you type in, say, Berkeley, CA. You'll see a map of the whole region, color coded for graduation rates, and little flags will pop out for every district. (Nice interface, Bill and Melinda! First thing you've done right.) Compare districts these vultures control with others they haven't "rescued" yet.

I'm on the other coast, near Boston, and was researching the damage this same group is doing here. Check out New Schools Venture Fund, at Newschools.org. to see their real agenda. Districts will be taken over under NCLB, and forced to consume Broad's management control as he dispenses moneys to his entrepreneurial partners, all at taxpayer expense. Some philanthropy!

This successful entrepreneurial approach, free of beaureaucratic interference, has already been demonstrated by FEMA in New Orleans, by Walter Reed Hospital, and of course by the Provisional Authority in Baghdad.


Posted by chemtchr on December 16, 2007 at 10:27 AM | Report this comment

Latest in Feature

  • A Coach's Job Begins Off the Court

    Coach Joanne Boyle has built the Cal women's basketball program by treating team members as people as well as players.
    • Nov 18, 2009
  • Das Mann of Steel

    How a metalworker from Burning Man became the maestro of the huge American Steel artist complex.
    • Nov 11, 2009
  • Understanding North Korea

    For years, East Bay activists have been trying to influence US policy toward North Korea. Finally, Washington may be listening.
    • Nov 4, 2009
  • More»

Author Archives

  • Supermarket Chardonnays

    California's Central Coast offers some strong selections.
    • Nov 11, 2009
  • The Week of No Accountability

    Starring an alleged torturer and deadbeat who scored a public contract and a detective who screwed up a murder case and got to keep his job.
    • Oct 28, 2009
  • More»

Calendar

Submit an event

Most Popular Stories

  • You Don't Know Jack

    There's strong evidence that Marcel Diallo Jack, the self-styled "mayor of West Oakland," perpetrated a racist Internet fraud on a local activist.
  • Yelp and the Business of Extortion 2.0

    Local business owners say Yelp offers to hide negative customer reviews of their businesses on its web site ... for a price.
  • Rich, Black, Flunking

    Cal Professor John Ogbu thinks he knows why rich black kids are failing in school. Nobody wants to hear it.
  • A Troubled Rape Case

    The high-profile rape charges against Deputy District Attorney Michael Gressett are tainted by questionable facts, unorthodox prosecutorial conduct, and the unmistakable whiff of politics.
  • A Coach's Job Begins Off the Court

    Coach Joanne Boyle has built the Cal women's basketball program by treating team members as people as well as players.

© 2009 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved