Dellums Fails to Pay at Least $239,000 in Taxes 

Sources say the couple's financial troubles could rule out a reelection bid as the mayor is forced to return to lobbying.

Oakland Mayor Ron Dellums and his wife Cynthia Dellums owe at least $239,000 in back income taxes, according to the Internal Revenue Service. Sources say the couple's serious financial troubles could rule out a reelection bid next year and force him to return to his once-lucrative Washington, DC lobbying practice.

The IRS says the Dellumses failed to pay enough personal income taxes in 2005, 2006, and 2007. On October 14, the IRS placed an official lien against all of the couple's personal property for failure to pay adequate taxes in each of those years, according to records filed with the Alameda County Recorder's Office. Typically such liens remain in place until the back taxes are paid off.

In a statement made through his spokesman Paul Rose, Dellums disputed that he and his wife owe as much money as the IRS contends, although he acknowledged that they have not paid as much taxes as they should have. "There are previous disagreements with the IRS, regarding the amount owed," Dellums said. "The issue is being addressed and the matter will be resolved in short order."

Jesse Weller, a spokesman for the Bay Area office of the IRS, declined to comment on the Dellumses' case, citing the agency's rules on taxpayer confidentiality. But a knowledgeable source says Dellums and his wife have faced financial difficulties ever since they moved back to Oakland and he took over as mayor. "Their financial issues have weighed heavily on his mind from day one," the source said. "There's no question."

The mayor's federal income tax delinquency doesn't speak well for his ability to steward public resources in a city facing severe financial challenges. It also raises serious doubts about his ability to make good decisions. And being a tax delinquent violates his civic duty as both a public official and a citizen. "Public officials are supposed to be leaders for the rest of us," noted Oakland good-government activist Charlie Pine, a frequent critic of the mayor.

The revelations about the mayor's failure to pay taxes — first revealed Monday on the East Bay Express web site — also could sink his chances of winning reelection if he still harbors any plans of running again.

But that looks highly unlikely because he and his wife apparently don't earn enough from his official Oakland salary of about $184,000 a year to sustain the lifestyle to which they have become accustomed. For example, the couple rent a stately four-bedroom, three-bath home on Skyline Boulevard in the Oakland hills that appears to be out of their price range. The Dellumses don't have to reveal how much rent they pay each month, but according to public records, their home is rather large. It's 3,204 square feet and sits on 9,667-square-foot lot. According to Zillow.com, it's valued at $924,500, and was likely worth much more than that before the housing crash.

The Dellumses also are well known for their expensive tastes. The mayor dresses in exquisitely tailored suits, and his official mayoral calendar reveals that they eat out often, usually in upscale restaurants. In addition, Cynthia Dellums has held no paid positions since he became mayor, sources said. Instead, she acts as his unpaid advisor and is a fixture at City Hall.

Dellums took an unpaid leave of absence from his DC lobbying firm, Dellums and Associates, when he became mayor. Oakland's City Charter requires that the mayor have no outside jobs while in office. A source said the couple took a big financial hit when they came to Oakland because he was making much more money as a lobbyist.

But that doesn't square with the IRS lien and other public records. The Dellumses appear to have gotten into serious financial trouble at least a year before he became mayor and while he was still a lobbyist. In 2005, the couple, who file jointly, failed to pay $124,199 in federal income taxes, according to the lien. In addition, federal lobbying records culled by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics reveal that Dellums and Associates reported only $90,000 in lobbying income that year. As a result, it's unclear exactly how the Dellumses incurred so much tax trouble on so little income. (Although Dellums also likely gets a congressional pension in excess of $100,000 annually, exactly how much he receives is unknown because he does not have to report it on his official statements of economic interests filed with the city.) In short, it appears that Dellums' lobbying firm wasn't doing well, and he was in serious tax trouble long before he took his mayoral oath.

The IRS lien states that the Dellumses failed to pay $66,554 in taxes in 2006, which was also before he became mayor in January 2007. Lobbying records, however, show his lobbying firm did much better that year — earning $240,000 in income. But that's still substantially lower than the $370,000 the firm reported making in 2004. The IRS also maintains that the Dellumses failed to pay $48,247 in personal income taxes in 2007 — his first year as mayor.

Regardless of when the Dellumses' tax problems began, they likely have known about them for several years. The IRS routinely sends repeated notices to tax delinquents, demanding payment, before placing liens on their personal property.

Jerry Brown Escapes Scrutiny?

Tags:

Comments (5) RSS

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Cynthia Dellums un paid advisor, like a parrot on the shoulder of the "Leader" at the wheel of the Oakland ship of state, barking orders to all. Does the unpaid advisor pay her own way at Oakland city hall??? A parrot with teeth like a baracuda, claws that dig into anyone that crosses her/their agenda.
By squandering OUR tax dollars, how many less pot holes would their be, hit one latley???
What Oakland needs is leadership from the private sector, anyone that has managed to survive in the Oakland business bureacucracy climate would be most capable.
First revealed Monday on web site, who's web site??? East Bay Express, let us all suport those that advertise in this weekly that honors the First amentment.

Posted by Ingvard on November 4, 2009 at 7:47 AM | Report this comment

Report away on the Dull-ems shenanighans, but, puh-leeze, stop running THAT picture of the Missus in THAT dress. Truly the stuff of nightmares.

Posted by Lawngun on November 4, 2009 at 1:54 PM | Report this comment

Prop. 103 said (says) that Auto insurance rates in CA must be based on 19 factors. The top 3 factors, in order, are REM: record, experience, and mileage. Zip is the #4 factor of choice for most companies. Other factors include age, sex, marital status, type (value and repair cost) of vehicle you drive, etc. 103 also says that property & casualty insurers cannot directly share information. They got around that by forming CLUE (Comprehensive Loss Underwriting Exchange) a database run by LexisNexis
under the brand name of ChoicePoint. So they can still share info indirectly v directly
103 also says that the Insurance Commissioner must be elected, not appointed by the Gov. 103 says a lot of things, none of which may be altered, but Mercury's trying. No coincidence that they are committing a lot of contributions to Insurance Comm. Steve Poizner's bid for CA Gov. Mercury has low rates. Their market share is growing. They are based in LA. If your kid is one day old, they want to know his SSN
so they can charge for him as a driver the day he turns 16. I hate Mercury Insurance.

Posted by OakRaidFan on November 4, 2009 at 10:28 PM | Report this comment


"failed to pay $48,247 in personal income taxes in 2007"

Unless Dellums has some other source of income, there's only one explanation for an unpaid number that high.

Dellums didn't pay ANY income taxes in 2007. NOT EVEN A DIME OF WITHHOLDING.

How did he get away with this? Every employee in the country without a boatload of deduction has *some* amount taken out of their paycheck.

Posted by eastbay_jose on November 6, 2009 at 11:05 AM | Report this comment

Is there an ethics committee to comment on the tax dodging mayor or ethics rules in the City Charter that Russo should investigate? just asking

Posted by moleman510cee0 on November 7, 2009 at 9:15 AM | Report this comment

Latest in Full Disclosure

  • You Don't Know Jack

    There's strong evidence that Marcel Diallo Jack, the self-styled "mayor of West Oakland," perpetrated a racist Internet fraud on a local activist.
    • Nov 18, 2009
  • Oakland Ethics Commissioner Has Ethics Problem

    Oakland Public Ethics Commissioner Alex Paul is the domestic partner of a lobbyist and powerful PAC chairman. Plus, the city's police union breaks the law for Perata.
    • Nov 11, 2009
  • Manipulating the Vote

    Don Perata has been sending letters and conducting closed-door meetings in what looks like an effort to force Jean Quan out of the Oakland mayor's race.
    • Oct 28, 2009
  • More»

Author Archives

  • Campaign to Eradicate Moth Could Threaten Cats, Honeybees

    Environmentalists say the state's plans to eradicate the light brown apple moth are dangerous, while a former top USDA expert says they simply won't work.
    • Oct 7, 2009
  • Republicans on the Rebound?

    California GOP leaders are buoyed by Obama's shrinking poll numbers and the controversy over health care. But they lack strong political candidates.
    • Sep 30, 2009
  • More»

Calendar

Submit an event

Most Popular Stories

  • You Don't Know Jack

    There's strong evidence that Marcel Diallo Jack, the self-styled "mayor of West Oakland," perpetrated a racist Internet fraud on a local activist.
  • Yelp and the Business of Extortion 2.0

    Local business owners say Yelp offers to hide negative customer reviews of their businesses on its web site ... for a price.
  • A Coach's Job Begins Off the Court

    Coach Joanne Boyle has built the Cal women's basketball program by treating team members as people as well as players.
  • A Troubled Rape Case

    The high-profile rape charges against Deputy District Attorney Michael Gressett are tainted by questionable facts, unorthodox prosecutorial conduct, and the unmistakable whiff of politics.
  • A Small Town's Sweet Sorrow

    The tight bond between Crockett and C&H sugar has been polluted along with local waterways.

© 2009 East Bay Express    All Rights Reserved