The Age of Dark Payola
Netcasters take it in the pooper from the Copyright Royalty Board. The FCC certifies the HD Radio scam.
Bay Area leading light SomaFM faces crippling debt and insolvency along with many of its Internet radio peers including Pandora and Live 365 this Spring. Late last March, the Copyright Royalty Board three dudes in Washington raised SomaFM's webcasting rates from $10,000 in 2005 to $600,000 for 2006 (applying retroactively).
The ruling is "fair," says the top honcho of SoundExchange, the royalty collection group lobbying for higher rates on behalf of the major labels and artists.
"Staggering," is more like it, says SomaFM founder Rusty Hodge. "We were expecting rates to go up 10, maybe 20 percent. It would be painful, but at least it wouldn't put us out of business."
SoundExchange says it needs top dollar for artists. "Webcasters have a number of opportunities to maximize revenue with ... banner ads, pop-ups, video pre-rolls, audio commercials," says John Simson, executive director of SoundExchange.
But Hodge says he isn't interested in annoying his listeners, and exposure means more than gold to the indie bands he streams. Webcasters will seek relief through the legislature, because Hodge doubts such relief will emerge during a possible re-hearing before the Copyright Royalty Board in the coming weeks.
Zooming out for a moment, the whole netcast debacle fits into a bigger picture that spells out the banal maxim: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Recording labels suffered two major burns in the 20th century: 1) Labels failed to negotiate terrestrial, on-air radio royalties and radio became a billion-dollar industry with their music; 2) Labels failed to negotiate royalties for music videos on MTV, and another empire cashed in.
Now, no one's building any more empires with their content, goddammit. Not Napster, Kazaa, Morpheus, LimeWire, or BitTorrent. Not YouTube (sued by Viacom), MySpace (sued by Universal), and definitely not a bunch of pissant throwbacks to college radio.
The majority of Americans who don't listen to netcasts should care about all this, because developments in that pond have ramifications for the on-air world, says Hodge. Terrestrial radio stations may soon face Internet radio's two sucky choices: 1) Pay SoundExchange through the nose for whatever the station wants to play, or 2) Save money by making direct, legal deals with record labels to play a label's free "Abomination of the Week." I'm looking directly at you, Korn Unplugged.
It's the opposite of payola but with all the effects, says Hodge. It's Dark Payola.
"They're going after the over-the-air broadcasters next," he says. "There's no doubt. And if you think media consolidation is bad now, wait till it's back to the old payola days."
At this point, you, the reader, are supposed to write congresspersons, sign petitions, and make bumpers stickers stating: "Down with Dark Payola!" There better be concerts, artists. Good ones. Plugged-in ones. Korn will not be invited.
Being a cynic means you get to be right a lot. So after expecting and then watching Internet radio webcasters strangled in their crib, there comes a certain dark glee in seeing Big Radio finally get its long-awaited approval for its horrid new HD system.
To recap what I wrote in March, HD Radio tops the list of corporate scams. The word "monopoly" fails to encompass this carny shill. Public broadcasting licenses are licenses to print money, and Big Radio's mints just got four times bigger with no givebacks to the public.
"A dream delayed" is what one FCC dissenting commissioner called the dream of a thousand little local radio stations doing their thing. New technology can boost the number of radio stations similar to TV's move to cable. If we stick to the metaphor, it's as if ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC now owned all the cable channels too.
Cracks in my cynicism have come courtesy of more than dozen letters from all over the country. A lot of veteran broadcasters wrote in positing very cogent points. One pointed out: "All my peers in radio have been silenced, even though they don't want to go along." They say HD's flaws include super-bad distortion in the AM range and a bass-ackward interface courtesy of thirty-year-old technology.
Yet, these keen readers don't see HD and the billions of dollars that support it in Washington as a done deal. Public comments on HD are still open, they say, and people on the street seem to be voting "no" with their pocketbooks. "Big Radio covets our public airwaves," says Milspec390. "Our influence counts. Let's use it."
If by "influence," Milspec means "money," then yes, it does count. But most people are saving their influence right now for something more important to them ... like an iPhone.














Editor's Note: Comments are not edited or fact-checked by the East Bay Express.
HD radio simply doesn't work and what was once a dirty little secret now is sadly becoming more widely known. Why would anyone want to buy something that doesn't work? I wish I had known that before shelling out $700 for a radio that allows receptions of 2 (!) HD signals in my house here. I know of one other person that owns one and he can't get a solid signal on even one HD channel during his commute because of the East Bay Hills. The reception is very, very poor. Compare that with the internet or satellite radio, for example, with over a hundred signals that come in solidly. I'm just a regular guy (a teacher) and I don't have the funds to just flush down the toilet like that. Why would anyone else? I'm really sorry I bought one.
Comment by Rocco411 - January 24, 2008 @ 12:06 AM
I recently got an HD radio and have been quite happy with it. I like the additional stations, the commercial free broadcasts, the fact that I don't need to pay a subscription fee (I have noticed some repetition, but that's no different than regular radio). I am also outraged at all the stuff going on with internet radio. I'd hate to see some of my favorite internet broadcasts go under because of ridiculously huge fees from the men in Washington. I still don't entirely understand why y'all think HD radio is such an evil thing, but would like to know more about what HD radio is really about. I side with the local, anti-corporate folks here, but also feel like the arguments presented are very one sided and lots of trash-talking. I'd like a better and more full understanding of what HD radio is really about. I've wondered how they make money if they don't play commercials... Please help out an uneducated, concerned music lover and unsatisfied commercial radio listener... Thanks, Bailey
Comment by Anonymous - May 2, 2007 @ 09:37 PM
HD radio will fail and not for the reasons listed in other comments. People are not going to by HD radios - even if the price drops to 30 dollar per unit (which it wont.) There is no "killer ap" that's going to motivate anyone to buy a new HD radio because if a radio format was so good people were scrambling to listen to it corporate radio would put it on normal radio. Even if retailers stopped selling normal radios and only sold HD radios it would take decades to reach a sizable market penatration. Even if all new cars starting today came with a FREE HD radio already installed (which they don't) it would take 30 years to build up enough of an audience that advertisers would care. The FM radio that wakes me up in the morning I've had for 20 years and its going to last me another 20 years at least. The only way that HD radio is going to work is if 1) HD radios were given away for free and 2)the radio police came and took away all the old radios that work just fine. HD radio is a solution for radio stations - the one I work for is talking about it - but consumer don't even know it exists. They don't want it and they don't care about it. HD radio is already dead - but radio stations just don't know it yet.
Comment by Anonymous - April 18, 2007 @ 09:36 PM
Read all 7 comments